Faculty of School of Life and Health Sciences, Nursing Department, The Jerusalem College of Technology-Lev Academic Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Physiother Res Int. 2024 Jan;29(1):e2035. doi: 10.1002/pri.2035. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
Community mobility post-stroke is important for gaining independence in daily activities. Walking devices can facilitate mobility, but it remains unclear whether individuals who use a walking device walk as many daily steps as those who do not require a device. It is also unclear whether these groups differ in their independence in daily living. This study aimed (1) to compare daily steps, walking tests, and independence in basic and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) six months post-stroke between individuals who walk independently and individuals who use a walking device, (2) within each group to assess correlations between daily steps and walking tests, independence in basic and IADL.
Thirty-seven community-dwelling individuals with chronic stroke; 22 participants used a walking-device and 15 participants walked independently. Daily steps were calculated as a 3-day mean by hip accelerometers. Clinical walking tests included the 10-m-walk-test, Timed Up & Go and 'Walking While Talking'. Daily living was assessed using the Functional-Independence Measure and the IADL questionnaire.
Daily steps of the device-users were significantly lower than the independent-walkers (195-8068 versus 147-14010 steps/day) but independence in daily living was not significantly different. Different walking tests correlated with daily steps for device-users and independent-walkers.
This preliminary investigation in chronic stroke revealed that device-users walk significantly fewer daily steps but are as independent in daily living as independent-walkers. Clinicians should differentiate between individuals with and without a walking device and the use of different clinical walking tests to explain daily steps should be considered. Further research is needed to assess the impact of a walking device post-stroke.
脑卒中后社区活动能力对日常生活活动的独立至关重要。行走辅助器具可以促进活动能力,但目前尚不清楚使用行走辅助器具的个体与无需使用器具的个体相比,每日行走的步数是否相同。也不清楚这两组人群在日常生活独立性方面是否存在差异。本研究旨在:(1)比较脑卒中后 6 个月独立行走者和使用行走辅助器具者的每日步数、行走测试和日常生活活动(ADL)基本和工具性活动独立性;(2)在每组内评估每日步数与行走测试、ADL 基本和工具性活动独立性之间的相关性。
37 名居住在社区的慢性脑卒中患者;22 名参与者使用行走辅助器具,15 名参与者独立行走。通过髋部加速度计计算 3 天的平均每日步数。临床行走测试包括 10 米步行测试、计时起立行走测试和“行走时说话”。日常生活活动采用功能独立性量表和 IADL 问卷进行评估。
使用行走辅助器具者的每日步数明显低于独立行走者(195-8068 步/天与 147-14010 步/天),但日常生活独立性无显著差异。不同的行走测试与使用行走辅助器具者和独立行走者的每日步数相关。
本研究初步调查了慢性脑卒中患者,发现使用行走辅助器具者每日行走的步数明显较少,但日常生活独立性与独立行走者相同。临床医生应区分使用和不使用行走辅助器具的个体,考虑使用不同的临床行走测试来解释每日步数。需要进一步研究评估脑卒中后行走辅助器具的使用效果。