Suppr超能文献

评价 5 种商业泡沫产品对治疗金黄色葡萄球菌后犬皮肤表面和毛发残留抗菌效果。

Evaluation of residual antibacterial effects on canine skin surface and hair following treatment with five commercial mousse products against Staphylococcus pseudintermedius.

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.

Dermatology for Animals, Gilbert, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Vet Dermatol. 2023 Dec;34(6):495-504. doi: 10.1111/vde.13190. Epub 2023 Jul 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antibacterial effect studies of commercial antiseptics typically have evaluated hair and not the skin.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the antibacterial effects of mousse products on both canine skin and hair.

ANIMALS

Fifteen short-haired and eight long-haired dogs without skin disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five mousses were applied once: (1) 2% chlorhexidine and 2% miconazole; (2) 0.05% phytosphingosine; (3) 2% salicylic acid and 10% ethyl lactate; (4) 3% chlorhexidine and 0.5% climbazole; and (5) 2% chlorhexidine and 1% ketoconazole. Skin swabs and hair were collected from application sites before treatment, and at 1 h and at Day (D)2, D4, D8, D10 and D14 post-treatment. Skin swabs and hair were placed on Mueller-Hinton plates inoculated with Staphylococcus pseudintermedius inoculum suspension. Inhibition zones were measured after incubation.

RESULTS

Inhibition was not noted with mousses 2 and 3. In mousse 5, inhibition zone sizes produced by swabs from long- and short-haired dogs were not significantly different (p = 0.105), and all swabs and hair produced inhibition until D14, regardless of hair length. By contrast, in mousse 1, inhibition zones produced by swabs from long-haired dogs were smaller than those from short-haired dogs (p < 0.001), and swabs from long-haired dogs produced a shorter duration of bacterial inhibition than hair.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The antibacterial effects of mousse 5 were not affected by hair length. Hair may be acceptable for evaluating effects on the skin in short-haired dogs. However, long hair may interfere with product distribution and duration of bacterial inhibition. Therefore, the evaluation of hair alone may overestimate clinically relevant antibacterial effects.

摘要

背景

商业抗菌剂的抗菌效果研究通常评估头发而不是皮肤。

目的

评估慕斯产品对犬皮肤和毛发的抗菌效果。

动物

15 只短毛犬和 8 只长毛犬,无皮肤病。

材料和方法

每种慕斯产品应用 1 次:(1)2%洗必泰加 2%咪康唑;(2)0.05%植物鞘氨醇;(3)2%水杨酸加 10%乳酸乙酯;(4)3%洗必泰加 0.5%克霉唑;和(5)2%洗必泰加 1%酮康唑。治疗前、治疗后 1 小时及第 2、4、8、10 和 14 天,从应用部位采集皮肤拭子和毛发。皮肤拭子和毛发接种于接种了中间葡萄球菌菌悬液的 Mueller-Hinton 平板上。孵育后测量抑菌圈大小。

结果

慕斯 2 和 3 无抑菌作用。在慕斯 5 中,长毛犬和短毛犬皮肤拭子产生的抑菌圈大小无显著差异(p=0.105),所有皮肤拭子和毛发在第 14 天都产生抑菌作用,与毛发长度无关。相比之下,在慕斯 1 中,长毛犬皮肤拭子产生的抑菌圈小于短毛犬(p<0.001),且长毛犬皮肤拭子的抑菌作用持续时间短于毛发。

结论和临床相关性

慕斯 5 的抗菌效果不受毛发长度影响。毛发可能可用于评估短毛犬的皮肤抗菌效果。然而,长发可能会干扰产品分布和抑菌作用持续时间。因此,单独评估毛发可能会高估临床相关的抗菌效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验