• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有专门空间认知能力的藏食松鸦在学习空间任务时不会将蹭食作为一种稳定的策略。

Food-caching chickadees with specialized spatial cognition do not use scrounging as a stable strategy when learning a spatial task.

机构信息

Department of Biology and Evolution, University of Nevada, Ecology Evolution and Conservation Biology Graduate Program, Reno, NV 89557, USA.

Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5C2.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Jul 12;290(2002):20230900. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0900.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2023.0900
PMID:37434529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10336377/
Abstract

Social animals may use alternative strategies when foraging, with producer-scrounger being one stable dichotomy of strategies. While 'producers' search and discover new food sources, 'scroungers' obtain food discovered by producers. Previous work suggests that differences in cognitive abilities may influence tendencies toward being either a producer or a scrounger, but scrounging behaviour in the context of specialized cognitive abilities is less understood. We investigated whether food-caching mountain chickadees, which rely on spatial cognition to retrieve food caches, engage in scrounging when learning a spatial task. We analysed data from seven seasons of spatial cognition testing, using arrays of radio frequency identification-enabled bird feeders, to identify and quantify potential scrounging behaviour. Chickadees rarely engaged in scrounging, scrounging was not repeatable within individuals and nearly all scrounging events occurred before the bird learned the 'producer' strategy. Scrounging was less frequent in harsher winters, but adults scrounged more than juveniles, and birds at higher elevations scrounged more than chickadees at lower elevations. There was no clear association between spatial cognitive abilities and scrounging frequency. Overall, our study suggests that food-caching species with specialized spatial cognition do not use scrounging as a stable strategy when learning a spatial task, instead relying on learning abilities.

摘要

社会性动物在觅食时可能会采用替代策略,而生产者-觅食者是稳定的策略二分法之一。“生产者”搜索并发现新的食物来源,而“觅食者”则获取生产者发现的食物。先前的工作表明,认知能力的差异可能会影响成为生产者或觅食者的倾向,但在专门的认知能力背景下,觅食行为的了解较少。我们调查了是否依赖空间认知来检索食物藏点的储食山雀在学习空间任务时是否会出现觅食行为。我们使用射频识别启用的鸟食器阵列分析了七个季节的空间认知测试数据,以识别和量化潜在的觅食行为。山雀很少进行觅食,个体内部的觅食行为不可重复,几乎所有的觅食行为都发生在鸟类学会“生产者”策略之前。在更恶劣的冬季,觅食行为较少,但成年鸟比幼鸟觅食更多,海拔较高的鸟比海拔较低的鸟觅食更多。空间认知能力与觅食频率之间没有明显的关联。总的来说,我们的研究表明,具有专门空间认知能力的储食物种在学习空间任务时不会将觅食作为一种稳定的策略,而是依赖于学习能力。

相似文献

1
Food-caching chickadees with specialized spatial cognition do not use scrounging as a stable strategy when learning a spatial task.具有专门空间认知能力的藏食松鸦在学习空间任务时不会将蹭食作为一种稳定的策略。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Jul 12;290(2002):20230900. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0900.
2
Cognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger game.生产者-觅食者博弈中的认知与协方差。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Nov;90(11):2497-2509. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13551. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
3
Natural Selection and Spatial Cognition in Wild Food-Caching Mountain Chickadees.自然选择与野生食籽山雀的空间认知
Curr Biol. 2019 Feb 18;29(4):670-676.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
4
Specialized spatial cognition is associated with reduced cognitive senescence in a food-caching bird.在一种储存食物的鸟类中,特殊的空间认知与认知衰老减缓有关。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Mar 31;288(1947):20203180. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.3180.
5
What's in a mate? Social pairing decisions and spatial cognitive ability in food-caching mountain chickadees.同伴是什么?藏食性山雀的社会配对决策和空间认知能力。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Sep 13;290(2006):20231073. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1073.
6
Food-caching mountain chickadees can learn abstract rules to solve a complex spatial-temporal pattern.食籽松鸦能够学习抽象规则来解决复杂的时空模式。
Curr Biol. 2023 Aug 7;33(15):3136-3144.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.036. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
7
Stable producer-scrounger dynamics in wild birds: sociability and learning speed covary with scrounging behaviour.野生鸟类中稳定的生产者-窃取者动态:社交性和学习速度与窃取行为共同变化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Apr 12;284(1852). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2872.
8
Food discovery is associated with different reliance on social learning and lower cognitive flexibility across environments in a food-caching bird.食物发现与不同的社会学习依赖和较低的认知灵活性有关,在一种食籽鸟中跨越环境。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 May 26;288(1951):20202843. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2843. Epub 2021 May 19.
9
Social dominance has limited effects on spatial cognition in a wild food-caching bird.社会等级对一种野生食籽鸟的空间认知能力的影响有限。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 24;288(1963):20211784. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1784. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
10
On the importance of accounting for alternative foraging tactics when assessing cognitive performance in wild animals.在评估野生动物认知表现时,考虑替代觅食策略的重要性。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Nov;90(11):2474-2477. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13602.

引用本文的文献

1
Living on the edge: the evolution of spatial cognition in food-caching chickadees.边缘生存:储食山雀空间认知的进化
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jun 26;380(1929):20240120. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0120.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger game.生产者-觅食者博弈中的认知与协方差。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Nov;90(11):2497-2509. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13551. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
2
Natural Selection and Spatial Cognition in Wild Food-Caching Mountain Chickadees.自然选择与野生食籽山雀的空间认知
Curr Biol. 2019 Feb 18;29(4):670-676.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
3
Persistent producer-scrounger relationships in bats.蝙蝠中持久的生产者-清道夫关系。
Sci Adv. 2018 Feb 7;4(2):e1603293. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1603293. eCollection 2018 Feb.
4
Stable producer-scrounger dynamics in wild birds: sociability and learning speed covary with scrounging behaviour.野生鸟类中稳定的生产者-窃取者动态:社交性和学习速度与窃取行为共同变化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Apr 12;284(1852). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2872.
5
Personality-dependent differences in problem-solving performance in a social context reflect foraging strategies.社会环境中解决问题表现的个性依赖差异反映了觅食策略。
Behav Processes. 2017 Jan;134:95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
6
Experimental Evidence that Social Relationships Determine Individual Foraging Behavior.社会关系决定个体觅食行为的实验证据。
Curr Biol. 2015 Dec 7;25(23):3138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.075. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
7
Causes of Individual Differences in Animal Exploration and Search.动物探索与搜寻中个体差异的原因。
Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Jul;7(3):451-68. doi: 10.1111/tops.12148. Epub 2015 May 18.
8
Studying the evolutionary ecology of cognition in the wild: a review of practical and conceptual challenges.在野外研究认知的进化生态学:实践和概念挑战的综述。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016 May;91(2):367-89. doi: 10.1111/brv.12174. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
9
Scrounger numbers and the inhibition of social learning in pigeons.鸽子中的乞食者数量与社会学习的抑制
Behav Processes. 1997 Sep;40(3):201-7. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00783-3.
10
Individual-learning ability predicts social-foraging strategy in house sparrows.个体学习能力预测麻雀的社会觅食策略。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 22;278(1705):582-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1151. Epub 2010 Sep 1.