• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

污染后与三种修复材料的粘结强度比较以及两种清洁剂的使用情况

Comparison of bond strength to three restorative materials after contamination and the use of two cleaning agents.

作者信息

Yazigi Christine, Kern Matthias, Chaar M Sad

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Propaedeutics, and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Christian-Albrechts University at Kiel, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.

Professor and Chairman, Department of Prosthodontics, Propaedeutics, and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Christian-Albrechts University at Kiel, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Apr;133(4):1047-1053. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.06.002
PMID:37438166
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Scientific data on the decontamination effectiveness of a newly introduced cleaning agent are lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the tensile bond strength (TBS) of 3 different restorative bonding surfaces after contamination with saliva following different cleaning protocols.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 192 disk specimens were made out of 3 materials (n=64); Katana Avencia (A), Katana Zirconia (Z), and e.max CAD (L). The bonding surfaces of all disks were polished, steam cleaned, and then pretreated by following the recommended protocol for each material. The specimens of each group were divided into 4 subgroups (n=16). The first subgroup served as the reference (R), where no contamination was applied. The 3 other subgroups were contaminated with saliva and subsequently rinsed with water for 20 seconds and dried with oil- and water-free air spray. They were then either not treated with any cleaning method (0), cleaned with Katana Cleaner (K), or cleaned with Ivoclean (I). The bonding surfaces of the specimens were perpendicularly luted to plexiglass tubes filled with dual-polymerizing composite resin (Clearfil DC Core) with resin cement (Panavia V5) after the recommended surface conditioning. Each subgroup was further subdivided into 2 groups: stored in 37 °C water for 3 days or subjected to thermal-cyclic loading for 150 days with 37 500 thermal cycles (7500 per month), temperature 5 to 55 °C, and dwell time of 30 seconds. All specimens were subjected to TBS testing in a universal testing machine. Three-way ANOVA was applied. A significant interaction (P<.01) was detected between the 3 different variables (material, treatment, aging). After significant interactions had been revealed by 3-way ANOVA, additional statistical analysis was performed by using separate 2-way ANOVAs, then separate 1-way ANOVAs followed by the Tukey-HSD test for post hoc pairwise comparisons among groups (α=.05 for all tests). All specimens underwent failure mode analysis after TBS testing RESULTS: All specimens survived the storage with thermocycling except for group Z-0, where all specimens debonded during thermocycling. The mean ±standard deviation TBS values ranged from 18.3 ±5.3 MPa to 34.0 ±5.4 MPa after 3 days and from 6.7 ±5.5 MPa to 26.9 ±5.4 MPa after 150 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Contaminated groups that did not receive any cleaning had significantly lower TBS. Thermocycling had a negative effect on the TBS but was not statistically significant for all groups. Using the same cleaning method, the restorative material did had a significant effect on the TBS after 150 days.

摘要

问题陈述

缺乏关于一种新引入的清洁剂去污效果的科学数据。

目的

本体外研究的目的是评估和比较在不同清洁方案后被唾液污染的3种不同修复粘结面的拉伸粘结强度(TBS)。

材料与方法

用3种材料制作了总共192个圆盘标本(n = 64);卡塔纳·阿文西亚(A)、卡塔纳氧化锆(Z)和e.max CAD(L)。所有圆盘的粘结面均进行抛光、蒸汽清洁,然后按照每种材料推荐的方案进行预处理。每组标本分为4个亚组(n = 16)。第一个亚组作为参照组(R),未施加污染。其他3个亚组被唾液污染,随后用水冲洗20秒,并用无水无油空气喷雾干燥。然后它们要么不采用任何清洁方法处理(0),用卡塔纳清洁剂(K)清洁,要么用伊沃清洁剂(I)清洁。在推荐的表面处理后,用树脂粘结剂(帕纳维亚V5)将标本的粘结面垂直粘结到装有双聚合复合树脂(Clearfil DC Core)的有机玻璃管上。每个亚组进一步分为2组:在37℃水中储存3天,或进行150天的热循环加载,共37500次热循环(每月7500次),温度为5至55℃,保压时间为30秒。所有标本在万能试验机上进行TBS测试。应用三因素方差分析。在3个不同变量(材料、处理、老化)之间检测到显著的交互作用(P <.01)。在三因素方差分析揭示显著交互作用后,通过单独的双因素方差分析进行额外的统计分析,然后进行单独的单因素方差分析,随后进行Tukey-HSD检验以进行组间事后成对比较(所有检验的α = 0.05)。所有标本在TBS测试后进行失效模式分析。

结果

除Z-0组外,所有标本在热循环储存后均存活,Z-0组的所有标本在热循环过程中脱粘。3天后,平均±标准差TBS值范围为18.3±5.3 MPa至34.0±5.4 MPa,150天后为6.7±5.5 MPa至26.9±5.4 MPa。

结论

未接受任何清洁的污染组的TBS显著较低。热循环对TBS有负面影响,但对所有组而言在统计学上不显著。使用相同的清洁方法,150天后修复材料对TBS有显著影响。

相似文献

1
Comparison of bond strength to three restorative materials after contamination and the use of two cleaning agents.污染后与三种修复材料的粘结强度比较以及两种清洁剂的使用情况
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Apr;133(4):1047-1053. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
2
Long-term resin bonding to zirconia ceramic with a new universal primer.新型通用底涂剂对氧化锆陶瓷的长期树脂粘接。
J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Nov;106(5):319-27. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60137-6.
3
Influence of pretreating enamel on the durability of resin bonds.预处理牙釉质对树脂粘结耐久性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Apr;133(4):1054.e1-1054.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.01.002. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
4
Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material.不同表面处理对氧化锆桩与复合树脂核材料之间短期粘结强度和耐久性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 May;99(5):388-99. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60088-8.
5
Influence of contamination on resin bond strength to nano-structured alumina-coated zirconia ceramic.污染对树脂与纳米结构氧化铝涂层氧化锆陶瓷粘结强度的影响。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2010 Aug;118(4):396-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00752.x.
6
Effectiveness of different cleaning measures on the bonding of resin cement to saliva-contaminated or blood-contaminated zirconia.不同清洁措施对唾液污染或血液污染氧化锆粘结树脂水泥的效果。
J Dent. 2022 May;120:104084. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104084. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
7
Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures.不同清洁程序后Panavia F 2.0与污染氧化锆陶瓷的粘结
Dent Mater. 2007 Apr;23(4):506-12. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.008. Epub 2006 Aug 7.
8
Effects of Cleaning Protocols on Resin Bond Strength to Saliva-Contaminated Monolithic Zirconia.清洁方案对树脂与唾液污染的整体式氧化锆粘结强度的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2025 Apr 30;27:93-102. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.c_2011.
9
Bonding Effectiveness of Saliva-Contaminated Monolithic Zirconia Ceramics Using Different Decontamination Protocols.不同去污染方案对受唾液污染的整体氧化锆陶瓷粘结效果的影响
Biomed Res Int. 2024 Apr 4;2024:6670159. doi: 10.1155/2024/6670159. eCollection 2024.
10
Effect of saliva contamination and artificial aging on different primer/cement systems bonded to zirconia.唾液污染和人工老化对不同底涂/粘结剂系统粘结到氧化锆上的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 May;119(5):833-839. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of surface cleaning methods on bond strength between canal sealer-contaminated dentin and composite resin.表面清洁方法对根管封闭剂污染牙本质与复合树脂之间粘结强度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1046. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06480-7.
2
Bonding Effectiveness of Saliva-Contaminated Monolithic Zirconia Ceramics Using Different Decontamination Protocols.不同去污染方案对受唾液污染的整体氧化锆陶瓷粘结效果的影响
Biomed Res Int. 2024 Apr 4;2024:6670159. doi: 10.1155/2024/6670159. eCollection 2024.
3
Durability of Resin Bonding to Dental 3Y-TZP Zirconia Using Different Adhesive Systems.
使用不同粘结系统时树脂与牙科3Y-TZP氧化锆的粘结耐久性。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jan 15;17(2):424. doi: 10.3390/ma17020424.