Pole produits de santé, Service de pharmacie, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020, Cedex BP307, Lille, France.
Centre Régional de Pharmacovigilance, Service de pharmacologie, CHU, Lille, France.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Sep;79(9):1229-1238. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03536-x. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
An international shortage of ranitidine led to adjustments in premedication regimens for paclitaxel-based chemotherapy in early October 2019. In this study, we implemented and evaluated an anti-allergic protocol without histamine-2 antagonists (H2As) and aimed to assess the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to the different premedication regimens used.
We conducted a single-center observational retrospective study of paclitaxel administrations (7173 administrations in 831 patients). Between January 2019 and December 2020, all allergies reported were recorded. A mixed logistic regression model was implemented to predict the risk of allergy at each injection and to account for repeated administration per patient.
A total of 27 HSRs occurred in 24 patients. No protective effect was observed for H2A when comparing paclitaxel injections with H2A premedication versus without H2A (OR = 1.12, p = 0.84). There was also no significant difference in risk of HSR for famotidine versus ranitidine (OR = 0.79, p = 0.78). However, the risk of HSRs was significantly lower for paclitaxel injections with corticosteroids than for those without (OR = 0.08, p = 0.03). In addition, the risk of HSR was significantly higher for the first, second, or third paclitaxel injections than for the subsequent injections (OR = 10.1, p < 0.001).
We did not find substantial evidence of an increased risk of HSR due to the absence of H2A in the premedication protocols for paclitaxel. Thus, in contrary to the existing literature on paclitaxel, our findings support the use of a premedication protocol without H2A.
2019 年 10 月初,雷尼替丁在全球范围内短缺,这导致紫杉醇类化疗的预处理方案进行了调整。在这项研究中,我们实施并评估了一种不含组胺 2 拮抗剂(H2As)的抗过敏方案,并旨在评估用于不同预处理方案的过敏反应(HSRs)的风险。
我们对紫杉醇给药(831 名患者的 7173 次给药)进行了单中心观察性回顾性研究。在 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,记录了所有报告的过敏反应。实施混合逻辑回归模型来预测每次注射的过敏风险,并考虑每个患者的重复给药。
在 24 名患者中共有 27 例 HSR 发生。与 H2A 预处理相比,在没有 H2A 的情况下,H2A 对紫杉醇注射没有保护作用(OR=1.12,p=0.84)。法莫替丁与雷尼替丁相比,HRs 的风险也无显著差异(OR=0.79,p=0.78)。然而,与没有皮质类固醇的紫杉醇注射相比,皮质类固醇的 HSRs 风险明显降低(OR=0.08,p=0.03)。此外,与后续注射相比,第一次、第二次或第三次紫杉醇注射的 HSR 风险明显更高(OR=10.1,p<0.001)。
我们没有发现实质性证据表明,由于紫杉醇预处理方案中缺乏 H2A,HSR 的风险会增加。因此,与现有的紫杉醇文献相反,我们的研究结果支持使用不含 H2A 的预处理方案。