Suppr超能文献

乳房重建手术的整形外科市场份额:对两个全国性数据库的分析

Plastic surgery market share of breast reconstructive procedures: An analysis of two nationwide databases.

作者信息

Rochlin Danielle H, Matros Evan, Shamsunder Meghana G, Rubenstein Robyn, Nelson Jonas A, Sheckter Clifford C

机构信息

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.

Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;128(7):1064-1071. doi: 10.1002/jso.27398. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Given advances that streamline breast reconstruction (e.g., prepectoral placement, acellular dermal matrix [ADM], oncoplastic surgery), there is concern that nonplastic surgeons are performing a growing proportion of breast reconstructive procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate US trends in the market share of breast reconstruction performed by plastic compared to general surgeons.

METHODS

IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Claims 2006-2017 and NSQIP 2005-2020 were queried to identify women who underwent mastectomy with alloplastic (tissue expander or implant-based) or free flap reconstruction, or lumpectomy with oncoplastic reconstruction (breast reduction, mastopexy, or local/regional flap). MarketScan included immediate and delayed reconstructions, while all NSQIP reconstructions were immediate. Poisson regression with incident rate ratios (IRRs) modeled trends in surgeon type over time.

RESULTS

The cohort included 65 168 encounters from MarketScan and 73 351 from NSQIP. Plastic surgeons performed 95.8% of free flap, 93.8% of alloplastic, and 64.9% of oncoplastic reconstructions. Plastic surgeons performed an increasing proportion of immediate oncoplastic reduction and mastopexy (MarketScan IRR: 1.077, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.060-1.094, p < 0.001; NSQIP IRR: 1.041, 95% CI: 1.030-1.052, p < 0.001). There were no clinically significant trends for delayed oncoplastic, alloplastic, or free flap reconstructions. Plastic surgeons were more likely to use ADM compared to general surgeons in NSQIP (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Plastic surgeons gained market share in immediate oncoplastic breast reduction and mastopexy over the past two decades without any loss in alloplastic or free flap breast reconstruction. Plastic surgeons should continue collaboration with breast surgical oncologists to reinforce the shared surgeon model for management of breast cancer.

摘要

背景与目的

鉴于在简化乳房重建方面取得的进展(例如胸肌前植入、脱细胞真皮基质[ADM]、肿瘤整形手术),人们担心非整形医生实施的乳房重建手术比例在不断增加。本研究的目的是评估与普通外科医生相比,整形外科医生在美国乳房重建市场份额的趋势。

方法

查询IBM® MarketScan®商业索赔数据库2006 - 2017年的数据以及国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)2005 - 2020年的数据,以确定接受乳房切除术后进行异体植入(组织扩张器或植入物)或游离皮瓣重建,或接受肿瘤整形重建(乳房缩小术、乳房上提术或局部/区域皮瓣)的乳房肿块切除术的女性。MarketScan数据库涵盖即刻和延迟重建,而NSQIP数据库中的所有重建均为即刻重建。采用泊松回归和发病率比(IRR)来模拟外科医生类型随时间的趋势。

结果

该队列包括来自MarketScan数据库的65168例病例和来自NSQIP数据库的73351例病例。整形外科医生实施了95.8%的游离皮瓣重建、93.8%的异体植入重建以及64.9%的肿瘤整形重建。整形外科医生实施即刻肿瘤整形乳房缩小术和乳房上提术的比例在增加(MarketScan数据库的IRR:1.077,95%置信区间[CI]:1.060 - 1.094,p < 0.001;NSQIP数据库的IRR:1.041,95% CI:1.030 - 1.052,p < 0.001)。对于延迟肿瘤整形、异体植入或游离皮瓣重建,没有临床显著趋势。在NSQIP数据库中,与普通外科医生相比,整形外科医生更有可能使用ADM(p < 0.001)。

结论

在过去二十年中,整形外科医生在即刻肿瘤整形乳房缩小术和乳房上提术方面获得了市场份额,而异体植入或游离皮瓣乳房重建方面没有任何损失。整形外科医生应继续与乳腺外科肿瘤学家合作,以强化乳腺癌管理的共同外科医生模式。

相似文献

4
Landscape of oncoplastic breast surgery across Poland.
Pol Przegl Chir. 2017 Dec 30;89(6):14-19. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.6735.
10
Increasing Role of Oncoplastic Surgery for Breast Cancer.乳腺癌中整形手术作用的提升。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2019 Dec 14;21(12):111. doi: 10.1007/s11912-019-0860-9.

本文引用的文献

7
Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Growth Story.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep;144(3):525e-527e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005924.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验