• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚洲人口最多的五个国家的可再生能源、农业、全球化与生态足迹之间的动态关系。

A dynamic relationship between renewable energy, agriculture, globalization, and ecological footprint of the five most populous countries in Asia.

作者信息

Li Lei, Ali Arshad, Li Shen, Zhang Taiming

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130000, China.

Institute of Economics and Management, North East Agricultural University, Harbin, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul 13. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28546-1.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-023-28546-1
PMID:37440128
Abstract

This study aims to examine the impact of globalization, renewable energy consumption, and agricultural value addition on the ecological footprint of selected five most populous countries in Asia during the period 1975-2020. The Westerlund cointegration test supports long-term cointegration relationships among the considered variables in selected countries. The long-term resilience results of the second-generation cross-sectionally augmented autoregressive distributed lag approach evidently demonstrate that agricultural value addition and globalization contribute significantly to the long-term ecological footprint of the five most populous countries in Asia. However, renewable energy consumption significantly reduces the ecological footprint. Moreover, the impact of economic growth on ecological footprint is significantly positive, while the square of economic growth had a significantly negative impact on ecological footprint, thus validating the inverted U-shaped environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for specific Asian densely populated countries. The causality test results of Dumitrescu and Hurlin support the feedback hypothesis by showing a two-way causal relationship between renewable energy consumption and economic growth. There is also a two-way causal relationship between agricultural value added and ecological footprint. Strategically, specific densely populated countries in Asia should encourage clean energy production and consumption in the agricultural sector, and the adoption of environmentally friendly technologies can improve environmental quality and agricultural production.

摘要

本研究旨在考察1975 - 2020年期间全球化、可再生能源消费和农业附加值对亚洲五个人口最多的选定国家生态足迹的影响。韦斯特伦德协整检验支持选定国家中所考虑变量之间的长期协整关系。第二代截面增强自回归分布滞后方法的长期弹性结果明显表明,农业附加值和全球化对亚洲五个人口最多国家的长期生态足迹有显著贡献。然而,可再生能源消费显著降低了生态足迹。此外,经济增长对生态足迹的影响显著为正,而经济增长的平方对生态足迹有显著负面影响,从而验证了特定亚洲人口密集国家的倒U形环境库兹涅茨曲线假说。杜米特雷斯库和胡林的因果关系检验结果通过显示可再生能源消费与经济增长之间的双向因果关系支持了反馈假说。农业附加值与生态足迹之间也存在双向因果关系。从战略上讲,亚洲特定人口密集国家应鼓励农业部门的清洁能源生产和消费,采用环保技术可以改善环境质量和农业生产。

相似文献

1
A dynamic relationship between renewable energy, agriculture, globalization, and ecological footprint of the five most populous countries in Asia.亚洲人口最多的五个国家的可再生能源、农业、全球化与生态足迹之间的动态关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul 13. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28546-1.
2
An empirical nexus between economic growth, energy utilization, trade policy, and ecological footprint: a continent-wise comparison in upper-middle-income countries.经济增长、能源利用、贸易政策和生态足迹之间的经验关系:中上收入国家按大洲的比较。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Nov;27(31):38995-39018. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09772-3. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
3
Disaggregated energy consumption, industrialization, total population, and ecological footprint nexus: evidence from the world's top 10 most populous countries.人口、工业化、总能源消费和生态足迹关联的细分研究:世界十大人口大国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(56):119069-119083. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30499-4. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
4
The intermittent effects of renewable energy on ecological footprint: evidence from developing countries.可再生能源对生态足迹的间歇性影响:来自发展中国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(40):56401-56417. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14600-3. Epub 2021 May 30.
5
Nexus between financial development, energy consumption, income level, and ecological footprint in CEE countries: do human capital and biocapacity matter?中东欧国家金融发展、能源消耗、收入水平与生态足迹的关系:人力资本和生物承载力重要吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Nov;26(31):31856-31872. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06343-z. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
6
The effects of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption on the ecological footprint: the role of environmental policy in BRICS countries.可再生能源和不可再生能源消费对生态足迹的影响:金砖国家环境政策的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(22):27885-27899. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12551-3. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
7
Globalization, renewable energy consumption, and agricultural production impacts on ecological footprint in emerging countries: using quantile regression approach.全球化、可再生能源消费和农业生产对新兴国家生态足迹的影响:使用分位数回归方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(36):49627-49641. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14204-x. Epub 2021 May 3.
8
Ecological footprint, globalization, and economic growth: evidence from Asia.生态足迹、全球化与经济增长:来自亚洲的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(31):77006-77021. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27754-z. Epub 2023 May 30.
9
An empirical analysis of the impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from seven Northeast Asian countries.可再生能源和不可再生能源消费对经济增长和二氧化碳排放影响的实证分析:来自七个东北亚国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(30):75041-75057. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27583-0. Epub 2023 May 20.
10
Links between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, and climate change, evidence from five emerging Asian countries.可再生能源和不可再生能源消费、经济增长与气候变化之间的联系,来自五个亚洲新兴国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(35):83687-83701. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27957-4. Epub 2023 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic relationships between environment-related technologies, agricultural value added, transport infrastructure and environmental emissions in the five most populous countries.五个人口最多国家中与环境相关的技术、农业增加值、交通基础设施和环境排放之间的动态关系。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 17;15(1):2308. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86451-8.