• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专注后努力在动机、兴趣和思维漫游之间关系中的作用:个体差异视角。

The role of focus back effort in the relationships among motivation, interest, and mind wandering: an individual difference perspective.

机构信息

Institute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.

Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Jul 13;8(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00502-0.

DOI:10.1186/s41235-023-00502-0
PMID:37442897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10344852/
Abstract

Considerable research suggests a link between mind wandering and diminished levels of motivation and interest. During episodes of mind wandering, individuals may engage in efforts to redirect their attention back to the task at hand (known as focus back effort). Building on the resource-control hypothesis, we hypothesized that the influence of interest and motivation on mind wandering may be mediated by focus back effort. In Study 1, we employed a latent-variable approach to investigate these relationships across three tasks with varying cognitive demands. The results showed that individual differences in interest indirectly influenced mind wandering through the mediating factors of motivation and focus back effort. Furthermore, individual differences in interest indirectly predicted task performance through the mediating factors of motivation, focus back effort, and mind wandering during the high-load task. In Study 2, we replicated the relationships among these factors in a reading comprehension task. The results consistently support the role of focus back effort as an adaptive mechanism for executive control, enabling the allocation of cognitive resources to both mind wandering and task performance. These findings underscore the significance of focus back effort in elucidating the interplay between mind wandering, motivation, interest, and task performance. Importantly, our results align with the resource-control theory.

摘要

大量研究表明,心流与动机和兴趣水平降低之间存在关联。在心流期间,个体可能会努力将注意力重新集中到手头的任务上(称为焦点后努力)。基于资源控制假说,我们假设兴趣和动机对心流的影响可以通过焦点后努力来介导。在研究 1 中,我们采用潜在变量方法在三个具有不同认知需求的任务中研究了这些关系。结果表明,兴趣的个体差异通过动机和焦点后努力等中介因素间接影响心流。此外,兴趣的个体差异通过动机、焦点后努力和高负荷任务中心流等中介因素间接预测任务表现。在研究 2 中,我们在阅读理解任务中复制了这些因素之间的关系。结果一致支持焦点后努力作为执行控制的适应性机制的作用,使认知资源能够同时分配给心流和任务表现。这些发现强调了焦点后努力在阐明心流、动机、兴趣和任务表现之间相互作用的重要性。重要的是,我们的结果与资源控制理论一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/186e/10344852/17435ecbb04a/41235_2023_502_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/186e/10344852/b51d86e2ff73/41235_2023_502_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/186e/10344852/8e4190bd3f28/41235_2023_502_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/186e/10344852/f488846f050b/41235_2023_502_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/186e/10344852/0152debdf6df/41235_2023_502_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/186e/10344852/17435ecbb04a/41235_2023_502_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/186e/10344852/b51d86e2ff73/41235_2023_502_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/186e/10344852/8e4190bd3f28/41235_2023_502_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/186e/10344852/f488846f050b/41235_2023_502_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/186e/10344852/0152debdf6df/41235_2023_502_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/186e/10344852/17435ecbb04a/41235_2023_502_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of focus back effort in the relationships among motivation, interest, and mind wandering: an individual difference perspective.专注后努力在动机、兴趣和思维漫游之间关系中的作用:个体差异视角。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Jul 13;8(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00502-0.
2
Working memory capacity predicts focus back effort under different task demands.工作记忆容量可预测在不同任务需求下的注意力恢复努力程度。
Conscious Cogn. 2023 Nov;116:103589. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103589. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
3
Mind-wandering, cognition, and performance: a theory-driven meta-analysis of attention regulation.思维漫游、认知和表现:注意力调节的理论驱动元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1411-1431. doi: 10.1037/a0037428. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
4
Mind wandering and reading comprehension: examining the roles of working memory capacity, interest, motivation, and topic experience.心流与阅读理解:考察工作记忆容量、兴趣、动机和主题经验的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):832-842. doi: 10.1037/a0029669. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
5
Pleasantness of mind wandering is positively associated with focus back effort in daily life: Evidence from resting state fMRI.心境游移的愉悦感与日常生活中的专注努力呈正相关:来自静息态 fMRI 的证据。
Brain Cogn. 2021 Jun;150:105731. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105731. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
6
The Relationship between Concentration Effort, Focus Back Effort, Focus Back State, and Mind Wandering.注意力集中努力、注意力恢复努力、注意力恢复状态与走神之间的关系。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Feb 22;14(3):162. doi: 10.3390/bs14030162.
7
A multi-faceted approach to understanding individual differences in mind-wandering.一种理解走神个体差异的多方面方法。
Cognition. 2020 May;198:104078. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104078. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
8
The neurotic wandering mind: An individual differences investigation of neuroticism, mind-wandering, and executive control.神经质的走神思维:关于神经质、走神及执行控制的个体差异研究
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Apr;70(4):649-663. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1145706. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
9
Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention.工作记忆容量为何能预测阅读理解的变化?思维漫游和执行注意的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 May;141(2):302-320. doi: 10.1037/a0025250. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
10
Working memory capacity does not always support future-oriented mind-wandering.工作记忆容量并不总是支持以未来为导向的走神。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2013 Mar;67(1):41-50. doi: 10.1037/a0031252.

引用本文的文献

1
Extending homeostasis to thought dynamics for a comprehensive explanation of mind-wandering.将内稳态扩展至思维动态,以全面解释走神现象。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 13;15(1):8677. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92561-0.
2
The Relationship between Concentration Effort, Focus Back Effort, Focus Back State, and Mind Wandering.注意力集中努力、注意力恢复努力、注意力恢复状态与走神之间的关系。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Feb 22;14(3):162. doi: 10.3390/bs14030162.

本文引用的文献

1
Mind wandering probes as a source of mind wandering depends on attention control demands.思维漫游探测作为思维漫游的来源,取决于注意力控制的需求。
Conscious Cogn. 2022 Aug;103:103355. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103355. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
2
Reconceptualizing mind wandering from a switching perspective.从转换视角重新概念化走神。
Psychol Res. 2023 Mar;87(2):357-372. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01676-w. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
3
The cost of being absent: Is meta-awareness of mind-wandering related to depression symptom severity, rumination tendencies and trauma intrusions?
心不在焉的代价:元意识与抑郁症状严重程度、反刍倾向和创伤性闯入有关吗?
J Affect Disord. 2021 Sep 1;292:131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.053. Epub 2021 May 27.
4
The influence of mood on the effort in trying to shift one's attention from a mind wandering phase to focusing on ongoing activities in a laboratory and in daily life.心境对努力将注意力从思维漫游阶段转移到实验室和日常生活中正在进行的活动上的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2021 Sep;35(6):1136-1149. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1929854. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
Pleasantness of mind wandering is positively associated with focus back effort in daily life: Evidence from resting state fMRI.心境游移的愉悦感与日常生活中的专注努力呈正相关:来自静息态 fMRI 的证据。
Brain Cogn. 2021 Jun;150:105731. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105731. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
6
Mind wandering increases linearly with text difficulty.思维漫游随文本难度呈线性增加。
Psychol Res. 2022 Feb;86(1):284-293. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01483-9. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
7
Working memory capacity and (in)voluntary mind wandering.工作记忆容量与(不)自主的思维漫游。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Aug;27(4):758-767. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01737-4.
8
A multi-faceted approach to understanding individual differences in mind-wandering.一种理解走神个体差异的多方面方法。
Cognition. 2020 May;198:104078. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104078. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
9
Cognitive control across adolescence: Dynamic adjustments and mind-wandering.青少年期的认知控制:动态调整与思维漫游。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Jun;149(6):1017-1031. doi: 10.1037/xge0000698. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
10
Mind-wandering rates fluctuate across the day: evidence from an experience-sampling study.一天中思绪游荡的频率会发生波动:一项经验抽样研究的证据。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018 Dec 29;3(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0141-4.