Robison Matthew K, Miller Ashley L, Unsworth Nash
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, United States.
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, United States.
Cognition. 2020 May;198:104078. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104078. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
The present study examined a multi-faceted approach to individual differences in mind-wandering. Further, the influence of task demands as a moderator of inter-individual relationships and the distinction between intentional and unintentional mind-wandering was also examined. A large sample (N = 332) of participants completed a battery of tasks during which mind-wandering was measured with periodic thought probes. One set of tasks placed relatively high demands on attention, whereas another set of tasks placed relatively low demands on attention. We also measured individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control, along with measures of state variables like motivation, alertness, and mood. Finally, participants completed a series of questionnaires to measure various personality traits. Overall, the results reinforced the importance of taking a multi-faceted approach to mind-wandering - one that address individual differences at the cognitive, contextual, and dispositional levels, as well as the distinction between intentional and unintentional mind-wandering.
本研究考察了一种针对思维游荡个体差异的多方面方法。此外,还考察了任务需求作为个体间关系调节因素的影响以及有意与无意思维游荡之间的区别。一大群参与者(N = 332)完成了一系列任务,在此期间通过定期的思维探测来测量思维游荡。一组任务对注意力的要求相对较高,而另一组任务对注意力的要求相对较低。我们还测量了工作记忆容量和注意力控制方面的个体差异,以及动机、警觉性和情绪等状态变量。最后,参与者完成了一系列问卷以测量各种人格特质。总体而言,结果强化了采用多方面方法研究思维游荡的重要性——这种方法要在认知、情境和性格层面解决个体差异问题,以及有意与无意思维游荡之间的区别。