Andrikopoulou Angeliki, Theofanakis Charalampos, Markellos Christos, Kaparelou Maria, Koutsoukos Konstantinos, Apostolidou Kleoniki, Thomakos Nikolaos, Haidopoulos Dimitrios, Rodolakis Alexandros, Dimopoulos Meletios-Athanasios, Zagouri Flora, Liontos Michalis
Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece.
1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 6;15(13):3519. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133519.
There is limited data on the optimal time interval between the last dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC).
We retrospectively identified patients with stage IIIC/IV HGSC who received NACT followed by IDS during a 15-year period (January 2003-December 2018) in our Institution.
Overall, 115 patients with stage IIIC/IV HGSC were included. The median age of diagnosis was 62.7 years (IQR: 14.0). A total of 76.5% (88/115) of patients were diagnosed with IIIC HGSC and 23.5% (27/115) with IV HGSC. Median PFS was 15.7 months (95% CI: 13.0-18.5), and median OS was 44.7 months (95% CI: 38.8-50.5). Patients were categorized in groups according to the time interval from NACT to IDS: <4 weeks (group A); 4-5 weeks (group B); 5-6 weeks (group C); >6 weeks (group D). Patients with a time interval IDS to NACT ≥4 weeks had significantly shorter PFS ( = 0.004) and OS ( = 0.002). Median PFS was 26.6 months (95% CI: 24-29.2) for patients undergoing IDS <4 weeks after NACT vs. 14.4 months (95% CI: 12.6-16.2) for those undergoing IDS later ( = 0.004). Accordingly, median OS was 66.3 months (95% CI: 39.1-93.4) vs. 39.4 months (95% CI: 31.8-47.0) in the <4 week vs. >4 week time interval NACT to IDS groups ( = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, the short time interval (<4 weeks) from NACT to IDS was an independent factor of PFS ( = 0.004) and OS ( = 0.003).
We have demonstrated that performing IDS within four weeks after NACT may be associated with better survival outcomes. Multidisciplinary coordination among ovarian cancer patients is required to avoid any unnecessary delays.
关于高级别浆液性卵巢癌(HGSC)新辅助化疗(NACT)最后一剂与间隔减瘤手术(IDS)之间的最佳时间间隔,数据有限。
我们回顾性确定了在我们机构15年期间(2003年1月至2018年12月)接受NACT后再行IDS的IIIC/IV期HGSC患者。
总体而言,纳入了115例IIIC/IV期HGSC患者。诊断时的中位年龄为62.7岁(四分位间距:14.0)。共有76.5%(88/115)的患者被诊断为IIIC期HGSC,23.5%(27/115)为IV期HGSC。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为15.7个月(95%置信区间:13.0 - 18.5),中位总生存期(OS)为44.7个月(95%置信区间:38.8 - 50.5)。根据从NACT到IDS的时间间隔将患者分为几组:<4周(A组);4 - 5周(B组);5 - 6周(C组);>6周(D组)。IDS至NACT时间间隔≥4周的患者PFS(=0.004)和OS(=0.002)显著缩短。NACT后<4周接受IDS的患者中位PFS为26.6个月(95%置信区间:24 - 29.2),而较晚接受IDS的患者中位PFS为14.4个月(95%置信区间:12.6 - 16.2)(=0.004)。相应地,NACT至IDS时间间隔<4周组与>4周组的中位OS分别为66.3个月(95%置信区间:39.1 - 93.4)和39.4个月(95%置信区间:31.8 - 47.0)(=0.002)。多因素分析显示,NACT至IDS时间间隔短(<4周)是PFS(=0.004)和OS(=0.003)的独立因素。
我们已经证明NACT后四周内进行IDS可能与更好的生存结果相关。卵巢癌患者需要多学科协作以避免任何不必要的延迟。