Fenske Fabian, Krause Leah, Meyer Stephan, Kujat Benjamin, Repmann Jacqueline, Neuhaus Michael, Zimmerer Rüdiger, Roth Andreas, Lethaus Bernd, Ziebolz Dirk, Schmalz Gerhard
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Cariology, Endodontology and Periodontology, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 3;12(13):4451. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134451.
This prospective observational study had two aims: (I) to assess whether a preoperative dental screening before endoprosthesis (EP) implantation with need-based dental intervention would decrease the prevalence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and (II) to evaluate whether instructed orthopedic surgeons would achieve similar results in oral screening as dentists. The preoperative oral health statuses of the patients, prior to EP insertion, were either evaluated by the patients' general dentists (Ia) or, if the patient had not visited a general dentist, by an instructed orthopedic surgeon (Ib). Both the dentist and orthopedic surgeon used standardized risk estimation (low risk, moderate risk, and high risk) for an oral-health-related infectious complication after EP insertion, including a recommendation for further management of the patient. If required, a need-based dental rehabilitation was performed. In addition, retrospective data evaluation of a comparison group (II) was performed, which had not been screened orally preoperatively. A total of 777 patients (screening group (I): = 402, of which 229 were screened by a dentist (Ia), 173 were screened by an orthopedic surgeon (Ib); comparison group (II): = 375) were included. No general association between early infection rate and preoperative oral screening in general was found (1% PJI in screening group (I), 1.6% PJI in comparison group (II); = 0.455). However, screening performance (dentist vs. orthopedic surgeon) had a significant impact on the prevalence of developed PJIs ( = 0.021). Thereby, 100% of observed infections in the screening group (I) occurred in the group with previous oral screening by an orthopedic surgeon (Ib). Furthermore, the C-reactive protein (CRP) value at discharge was significantly lower when general preoperative oral screening had been performed (group I vs. group II, = 0.03). Only preoperative oral screening by a dentist had the potential to reduce oral-focus-associated EP infections; therefore, increased attention should be paid to the further promotion of interdisciplinary work between dentists and orthopedic surgeons. Dental screenings, using objectifiable criteria, as applied in this study, seem reasonable but require further validation in larger cohorts.
(I)评估在内置假体(EP)植入前进行基于需求的牙科干预的术前牙科筛查是否会降低假体周围关节感染(PJI)的发生率;(II)评估接受指导的骨科医生在口腔筛查中是否能取得与牙医相似的结果。患者在EP植入前的术前口腔健康状况,要么由患者的普通牙医评估(Ia),要么,如果患者未看过普通牙医,则由接受指导的骨科医生评估(Ib)。牙医和骨科医生都对EP植入后与口腔健康相关的感染并发症使用标准化风险评估(低风险、中度风险和高风险),包括对患者进一步管理的建议。如有需要,进行基于需求的牙齿修复。此外,对术前未进行口腔筛查的对照组(II)进行回顾性数据评估。共纳入777例患者(筛查组(I):=402例,其中229例由牙医筛查(Ia),173例由骨科医生筛查(Ib);对照组(II):=375例)。总体上未发现早期感染率与术前口腔筛查之间存在一般关联(筛查组(I)的PJI为1%,对照组(II)的PJI为1.6%;=0.455)。然而,筛查表现(牙医与骨科医生)对发生PJI的发生率有显著影响(=0.021)。因此,筛查组(I)中观察到的感染全部发生在之前由骨科医生进行口腔筛查的组(Ib)中。此外,进行术前常规口腔筛查时,出院时的C反应蛋白(CRP)值显著更低(I组与II组比较,=0.03)。只有牙医进行的术前口腔筛查有可能减少与口腔病灶相关的EP感染;因此,应更加重视进一步促进牙医与骨科医生之间的跨学科合作。本研究中应用的使用可客观化标准的牙科筛查似乎合理,但需要在更大的队列中进一步验证。