Faulstich M E, Williamson D A, McKenzie S J, Duchmann E G, Hutchinson K M, Blouin D C
Int J Neurosci. 1986 Aug;30(1-2):65-72. doi: 10.3109/00207458608985656.
Although extensive research has been conducted on psychophysiological reactivity, there is a paucity of data concerning the temporal stability of such procedures. Test-retest reliability of experimental stressors from both mental and physical modalities were assessed using a wide range of psychophysiological measures. Absolute baseline and test values demonstrated adequate test-retest reliability for skin temperature, skin resistance, vasomotor response, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, while forearm EMG had low reliability. Difference scores, which represent change from baseline to test conditions, did not have adequate reliability. These data represent a necessary step towards standardization of psychophysiological assessment techniques and thus may guide further use of more reliable methods.
尽管已经对心理生理反应性进行了广泛研究,但关于此类程序的时间稳定性的数据却很匮乏。使用多种心理生理测量方法评估了来自心理和身体模式的实验应激源的重测信度。绝对基线值和测试值表明,皮肤温度、皮肤电阻、血管运动反应、心率、收缩压和舒张压的重测信度良好,而前臂肌电图的信度较低。代表从基线到测试条件变化的差异分数没有足够的信度。这些数据是心理生理评估技术标准化的必要步骤,因此可能会指导更可靠方法的进一步应用。