• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种评估瘢痕对职业和性健康影响的新型瘢痕评估工具的内容效度

Content Validity of a Novel Scar Assessment Tool Evaluating the Career and Sexual Well-being Impact of Scars.

作者信息

Garg Stuti P, Weissman Joshua P, Chwa Emily S, Galiano Robert D

机构信息

From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jul 12;11(7):e5118. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005118. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000005118
PMID:37448762
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10337705/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Currently, patient reported outcome scales used to assess scar impact focus solely on psychosocial well-being, symptoms, and appearance. There remains a need to develop a broadened measure of scar impact on patients, focusing on sexual and career aspects. This study investigates the content validity of the novel Career and Sexual Well-being (CS) Scar Impact Scale.

METHOD

The CS scale contains five questions and was developed from previous patient thematic analysis interviews describing scar impact, and covers self-conscious behavior, new partners, hiding of the scar, being hindered in the workplace, and concerns regarding unprofessional appearance. Cognitive interviews and established guidelines were used to ensure that the scale was comprehensive, reproducible, and easily understandable.

RESULTS

In total, 86 patients completed cognitive interviews. Patients had a clear understanding of the questions and elicited their intent in the interviews. An estimated 86% of patients rated the CS scale coverage of scar impact on career and sexual health at a three or above out of four; 95% said the specific instructions were clear, and 92% stated it took them less than 4 minutes to complete the scale. After the first round of interviews, a question about "perception/self-consciousness in a professional environment" was added based on patient suggestions.

CONCLUSIONS

The CS scar scale demonstrated face validity, acceptability, and field-readiness through cognitive interviewing of patients at our institution. Sexual well-being and career performance are important yet often neglected themes with which scars should be assessed. Usage of these tools would serve to improve current scar scales.

摘要

未标注

目前,用于评估瘢痕影响的患者报告结局量表仅关注心理社会幸福感、症状和外观。仍需要开发一种更广泛的衡量瘢痕对患者影响的方法,重点关注性和职业方面。本研究调查了新型职业与性健康(CS)瘢痕影响量表的内容效度。

方法

CS量表包含五个问题,是根据之前描述瘢痕影响的患者主题分析访谈编制而成,涵盖自我意识行为、新伴侣、瘢痕遮盖、在工作场所受到阻碍以及对不专业外表的担忧。采用认知访谈和既定指南以确保该量表全面、可重复且易于理解。

结果

共有86名患者完成了认知访谈。患者对问题有清晰的理解,并在访谈中阐明了问题意图。估计86%的患者对CS量表在职业和性健康方面对瘢痕影响的覆盖程度给出了四分制中三分及以上的评分;95%的患者表示具体说明清晰,92%的患者表示完成该量表花费他们不到4分钟。在第一轮访谈后,根据患者建议增加了一个关于“在专业环境中的感知/自我意识”的问题。

结论

通过对我们机构的患者进行认知访谈,CS瘢痕量表显示出表面效度、可接受性和现场适用性。性健康和职业表现是瘢痕评估中重要但常被忽视的主题。使用这些工具将有助于改进当前的瘢痕量表。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcdd/10337705/631c7e11b1d6/gox-11-e5118-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcdd/10337705/b06eff6eea28/gox-11-e5118-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcdd/10337705/b53fa6a33938/gox-11-e5118-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcdd/10337705/631c7e11b1d6/gox-11-e5118-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcdd/10337705/b06eff6eea28/gox-11-e5118-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcdd/10337705/b53fa6a33938/gox-11-e5118-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcdd/10337705/631c7e11b1d6/gox-11-e5118-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Content Validity of a Novel Scar Assessment Tool Evaluating the Career and Sexual Well-being Impact of Scars.一种评估瘢痕对职业和性健康影响的新型瘢痕评估工具的内容效度
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jul 12;11(7):e5118. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005118. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Scar Perception: A Comparison of African American and White Self-identified Patients.疤痕认知:非裔美国人和自我认定为白人的患者的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 May 23;10(5):e4345. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004345. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Instrument to Evaluate Treatments for Scars: The SCAR-Q.开发一种用于评估瘢痕治疗效果的新型患者报告结局工具:瘢痕质量问卷(SCAR-Q)。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Apr 24;6(4):e1672. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001672. eCollection 2018 Apr.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Psychometric Findings for the SCAR-Q Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Based on 731 Children and Adults with Surgical, Traumatic, and Burn Scars from Four Countries.基于来自四个国家的 731 名接受过手术、创伤和烧伤治疗的儿童和成人患者的 SCAR-Q 患者报告结局测量的心理计量学研究结果。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Sep;146(3):331e-338e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007078.
6
Daily Quality-of-life Impact of Scars: An Interview-based Foundational Study of Patient-reported Themes.疤痕对日常生活质量的影响:一项基于访谈的患者报告主题基础研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Apr 15;9(4):e3522. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003522. eCollection 2021 Apr.
7
Patient-reported Outcomes of Scar Impact: Comparing of Abdominoplasty, Breast Surgery, and Facial Surgery Patients.患者报告的瘢痕影响结果:腹部整形术、乳房手术和面部手术患者的比较
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Oct 12;10(10):e4574. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004574. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
Patient-related keloid scar assessment and outcome measures.患者相关的瘢痕疙瘩评估和结局测量。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar;129(3):648-656. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402c51.
9
Reliability and validity testing of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表在评估乳腺癌手术后线性瘢痕中的信度和效度测试
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Feb;119(2):487-94. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000252949.77525.bc.
10
The hidden cost of skin scars: quality of life after skin scarring.皮肤瘢痕的隐性代价:皮肤瘢痕形成后的生活质量
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008 Sep;61(9):1049-58. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.03.020. Epub 2008 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Daily Quality-of-life Impact of Scars: An Interview-based Foundational Study of Patient-reported Themes.疤痕对日常生活质量的影响:一项基于访谈的患者报告主题基础研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Apr 15;9(4):e3522. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003522. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
The Psychology of Scars: A Mini-Review.疤痕心理学:综述
Psychiatr Danub. 2018 Nov;30(Suppl 7):633-638.
3
Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Instrument to Evaluate Treatments for Scars: The SCAR-Q.开发一种用于评估瘢痕治疗效果的新型患者报告结局工具:瘢痕质量问卷(SCAR-Q)。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Apr 24;6(4):e1672. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001672. eCollection 2018 Apr.
4
Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Surgical and Traumatic Scars: A Systematic Review of their Development, Content, and Psychometric Validation.用于手术和创伤性疤痕的患者报告结局工具:对其开发、内容和心理测量学验证的系统评价
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Oct;40(5):792-800. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0642-9. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
5
Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding.内容效度——在新开发的用于医疗产品评估的患者报告结局(PRO)工具中建立和报告证据:ISPOR PRO 良好研究实践工作组报告:第 2 部分——评估受访者的理解。
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):978-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
6
Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: a qualitative study.接受乳房手术女性的满意度与生活质量:一项定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2009 May 1;9:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-11.
7
The hidden cost of skin scars: quality of life after skin scarring.皮肤瘢痕的隐性代价:皮肤瘢痕形成后的生活质量
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008 Sep;61(9):1049-58. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.03.020. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
8
Disfiguring burn scars and adolescent self-esteem.毁容性烧伤疤痕与青少年自尊
Burns. 1999 Nov;25(7):581-5. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(99)00065-0.
9
An investigation of the prevalence of psychological morbidity in burn-injured patients.
Burns. 1997 Nov-Dec;23(7-8):550-4. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(97)00083-1.