Suppr超能文献

慢性疼痛患者回顾性疼痛测量的准确性。

Accuracy of retrospective pain measurement in patients with chronic pain.

作者信息

Haase Ingo

机构信息

Department of Research, Development and Quality Assurance, Clinic Group Enzensberg, D-87629 Hopfen am See, Germany.

出版信息

Med Int (Lond). 2023 Jul 4;3(4):35. doi: 10.3892/mi.2023.95. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

The use of pain scales that refer to a past time period is thereby based on the assumption that patients accurately remember their 'average', 'greatest' and 'least' pain. The present study addresses the validity of numerical pain rating scales that refer to a past period of time (herein, the past 7 days). Routine data from 94 patients with chronic pain were retrospectively analysed. Pain questionnaire data on the greatest, least and average pain during the past week and on current pain were compared with the mean value of entries in a pain diary from the corresponding period. The retrospectively assessed average, greatest and least pain values were consistently slightly higher than the corresponding values of daily current pain measured for the studied collective of chronic pain patients. Current pain (at the time of answering the questionnaire) better represents daily currently measured pain [intraclass correlation (ICC)=0.885] than retrospective individual measurements. The greatest correlation with averaged diary data was shown by the combination of questionnaire data on average, least and current pain (ICC=0.911). The high correlations between the questionnaire and diary data support the validity of retrospective pain surveys. However, the current status influences recall. Thus, composite retrospective pain data improve with the addition of current pain.

摘要

因此,使用涉及过去时间段的疼痛量表是基于患者能够准确记住其“平均”、“最剧烈”和“最轻”疼痛的假设。本研究探讨了涉及过去时间段(此处指过去7天)的数字疼痛评分量表的有效性。对94例慢性疼痛患者的常规数据进行了回顾性分析。将过去一周内最剧烈、最轻和平均疼痛以及当前疼痛的疼痛问卷调查数据与相应时间段疼痛日记中的记录平均值进行比较。回顾性评估的平均、最剧烈和最轻疼痛值始终略高于为该慢性疼痛患者群体测量的每日当前疼痛的相应值。当前疼痛(在回答问卷时)比回顾性个体测量更能代表每日当前测量的疼痛[组内相关系数(ICC)=0.885]。平均、最轻和当前疼痛的问卷调查数据相结合与日记数据的平均相关性最高(ICC=0.911)。问卷调查和日记数据之间的高相关性支持了回顾性疼痛调查的有效性。然而,当前状态会影响回忆。因此,加入当前疼痛后,综合回顾性疼痛数据会有所改善。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of retrospective pain measurement in patients with chronic pain.
Med Int (Lond). 2023 Jul 4;3(4):35. doi: 10.3892/mi.2023.95. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.
2
Accuracy of recall of usual pain intensity in back pain patients.
Pain. 1999 Dec;83(3):533-539. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00161-X.
3
Validity of an illness severity measure for headache in a population sample of migraine sufferers.
Pain. 1999 Feb;79(2-3):291-301. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00181-x.
4
Reliability and validity of individual and composite recall pain measures in patients with cancer.
Pain Med. 2012 Oct;13(10):1284-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01470.x. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
8
Reliability and validity of the Japanese Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire.
Headache. 2003 Apr;43(4):343-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03069.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for menstrual pain relief: A randomized control trial.
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241266455. doi: 10.1177/17455057241266455.

本文引用的文献

2
Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain.
Pain. 2018 Mar;159(3):481-495. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001117.
3
Hippocampal morphology mediates biased memories of chronic pain.
Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 1;166:86-98. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.030. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
5
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
7
The Number of Ratings Needed for Valid Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials: Replication and Extension.
Pain Med. 2015 Sep;16(9):1764-72. doi: 10.1111/pme.12823. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
8
Single vs composite measures of pain intensity: relative sensitivity for detecting treatment effects.
Pain. 2013 Apr;154(4):534-538. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.12.017. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
9
Comparison of daily, weekly or monthly pain assessments in hip and knee osteoarthritis. A 29-day prospective study.
Joint Bone Spine. 2011 Oct;78(5):510-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.11.009. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
10
Validity of weekly recall ratings of average pain intensity in neck pain patients.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Oct;33(8):612-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.08.009.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验