毛发移植受区创建：打孔与裂隙的前瞻性半侧对比研究。

Recipient site creation for hair transplantation: A prospective half-side comparison study of hole versus slit.

作者信息

Kasai Yoshiaki, Tsushima Akitoshi, Abe Norihisa

机构信息

I-Landtower Clinic, Avenue Tenjin Building 6F, 1-22-20 Imaizumi, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka 810-0021, Japan.

出版信息

JPRAS Open. 2023 Jun 8;37:52-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.06.002. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpra.2023.06.002

PMID:37448984

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10336073/

Abstract

Follicular unit strip surgery and FUE (follicular unit extraction) are techniques used for donor harvesting in hair transplantation. For recipient site creation, the slit technique is now commonly used. The hole technique is an alternative technique in which holes are created in the tissue at the recipient site. This study compared these techniques in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the hole technique. Mean time for recipient site creation was significantly shorter with the hole technique than with the slit technique (95.5 s vs. 121 s; = 0.021). This can be explained by better visibility of the holes compared with slits. This study focused on recipient site creation and found that the hole technique was a rapid and effective for recipient site creation.

摘要

毛囊单位条切取术和毛囊单位提取术（FUE）是毛发移植中用于供体获取的技术。在受区创建方面，目前常用裂隙技术。打孔技术是一种替代技术，即在受区组织上打孔。本研究对这些技术进行了比较，以评估打孔技术的有效性。打孔技术创建受区的平均时间显著短于裂隙技术（95.5秒对121秒；P = 0.021）。与裂隙相比，孔的可视性更好，这可以解释这一现象。本研究聚焦于受区创建，发现打孔技术在创建受区方面快速且有效。