泌尿科住院医师培训期间接触女性盆底医学和重建外科学教员的情况。

Current exposure to Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery faculty during urology residency.

机构信息

Columbia University Irving Medical Center Department of Urology, New York, New York, USA.

Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2023 Sep;42(7):1569-1573. doi: 10.1002/nau.25247. Epub 2023 Jul 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Contemporary US resident exposure to Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) faculty during urology residency is unknown.

METHODS

Accredited US urology residencies were identified through the American Urological Association (AUA). Accredited, urology-based FPMRS fellowships were identified through the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction. The number of faculty and residency positions were obtained from program AUA profiles if they were last modified within the current application cycle; this information was obtained from program websites if AUA profiles were outdated. Data on faculty fellowship training was manually extracted from program websites. A quality control cross-check of program and faculty training characteristics was performed through direct communication with 5% of programs.

RESULTS

Of 139 accredited residency programs assessed, 10.8% were affiliated with an accredited, urology-based FPMRS fellowship. In total, 29.5% of residency programs, representing 25% of US urology residents, had neither a FPMRS fellowship nor any FPMRS certified faculty. The national FPMRS faculty-to-resident ratio was 1:10.8, and 7.4% of faculty at all residency programs were FPMRS certified. In comparison, faculty-to-resident ratios for other subspecialties were: 1:4.7 for pediatrics, 1:3.6 for oncology, 1:5.9 for minimally invasive surgery/endourology, 1:14.2 for trauma/reconstruction, and 1:11.8 for andrology or male sexual/reproductive health. The FPMRS faculty-to-resident ratio was 1:5.1 in programs with a urology-based FPMRS fellowship compared with 1:13.4 in programs without a FPMRS fellowship.

CONCLUSIONS

30% of US urology residency programs lack FPMRS trained faculty. Even when FPMRS faculty are on staff, the field is often underrepresented relative to other urologic subspecialties. Further studies are required to ascertain if inadequate exposure to FPMRS cases and mentors during training contribute to the shortage of urology residents who choose to specialize in FPMRS. This link has important implications for the current shortage of FPMRS providers.

摘要

简介

目前尚不清楚当代美国住院医师在泌尿科住院医师培训期间接触女性盆底医学和重建外科(FPMRS)教员的情况。

方法

通过美国泌尿协会(AUA)确定了美国认可的泌尿科住院医师培训计划。通过尿动力学协会,女性盆底医学和泌尿生殖重建协会确定了基于泌尿科的 FPMRS 研究员。如果在当前申请周期内对计划 AUA 资料进行了最后修改,则从计划 AUA 资料中获取教职员工和住院医师职位的数量;如果 AUA 资料过时,则从计划网站获取该信息。从计划网站手动提取了教职员工研究员培训方面的数据。通过与 5%的计划进行直接沟通,对计划和教职员工培训特征进行了质量控制交叉检查。

结果

在评估的 139 个认可的住院医师培训计划中,有 10.8%与认可的基于泌尿科的 FPMRS 研究员有关。总的来说,29.5%的住院医师培训计划(代表 25%的美国泌尿科住院医师)既没有 FPMRS 研究员,也没有任何 FPMRS 认证的教员。全国 FPMRS 教员与住院医师的比例为 1:10.8,并且所有住院医师培训计划中有 7.4%的教员是 FPMRS 认证的。相比之下,其他专业的教员与住院医师的比例为:儿科为 1:4.7,肿瘤学为 1:3.6,微创外科/内窥镜为 1:5.9,创伤/重建为 1:14.2,泌尿科或男性性健康/生殖健康为 1:11.8。在具有基于泌尿科的 FPMRS 研究员的计划中,FPMRS 教员与住院医师的比例为 1:5.1,而在没有 FPMRS 研究员的计划中,这一比例为 1:13.4。

结论

30%的美国泌尿科住院医师培训计划缺乏接受过 FPMRS 培训的教员。即使有 FPMRS 教员在任,该领域相对于其他泌尿科专业也常常代表性不足。需要进一步的研究来确定培训期间接触 FPMRS 病例和导师不足是否导致选择专门从事 FPMRS 的泌尿科住院医师短缺。这一联系对当前 FPMRS 提供者短缺具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索