Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, EPOC, UMR 5805, Station Marine d'Arcachon, F-33600 Pessac, France.
Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, EPOC, UMR 5805, Station Marine d'Arcachon, F-33600 Pessac, France.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2023 Sep;194(Pt A):115278. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115278. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
The effect of sediment dredging and disposal work on benthic communities was compared according to two sampling strategies, grab (1-mm mesh) and dredge (1-cm mesh). Nine subtidal, sandy sites were selected in Arcachon Bay (French Atlantic coast), where these operations were performed during winter. Fauna was sampled several months before and one year after the dredging or disposal work. The sediments were fine to medium sands and their characteristics were not modified. In dredging sites, abundance, diversity and community structure of grab sampled fauna were minimally affected by the activities, while abundance and community structure displayed significant changes for dredge sampled fauna. In disposal sites, there was no work effect on fauna, although environmental conditions changed, especially when initial sediments were covered by mussels or seagrass. This study suggests that dredge sampling can be an alternative to grab sampling for monitoring changes related to dredging in sandy shallow channels.
根据两种采样策略(抓斗(1 毫米网眼)和挖泥船(1 厘米网眼))比较了底栖群落的疏浚和处置工作的影响。在阿卡雄湾(法国大西洋海岸)选择了 9 个亚潮间带、沙质地点,冬季进行了这些作业。在疏浚或处置工作之前和之后的几个月内对动物群进行了采样。沉积物为细至中砂,其特性未发生改变。在疏浚地点,抓斗采样的动物群的丰度、多样性和群落结构受活动的影响最小,而挖泥船采样的动物群的丰度和群落结构则发生了显著变化。在处置地点,尽管环境条件发生了变化,特别是当最初的沉积物被贻贝或海草覆盖时,但是对动物群没有作业影响。本研究表明,在浅沙性渠道中,与疏浚相关的变化监测中,挖泥船采样可以替代抓斗采样。