All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2023;36:100741. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2023.100741. Epub 2023 Jul 9.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade is the preferred approach for treating early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. There is a lack of robust data comparing pathological complete response (pCR) and survival outcomes in anthracycline-free and anthracycline-containing regimens with single HER2-targeted therapy.
The present study retrospectively evaluated pCR between two groups: Single HER2-targeted therapy with and without anthracycline.
A total of 215 HER2-positive female breast cancer patients were analyzed who received eitheranthracycline-containing EC-TH (epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, followed by docetaxel and trastuzumab)oranthracycline-free TCH [docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab]. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified prognostic factors for survival and pCR.Kaplan Meier survival curvesdetermined disease-free survival(DFS) and overall survival (OS).
Baseline characteristics were comparable in both treatment groups. The pCR rate was 30.8% in the anthracycline-containing EC-TH group and 40.9% in the anthracycline-free TCH group; p = 0.140. Disease-free survival at 3 years (65.8% vs. 58.4%) and 5 years (49.2% vs. 55.2%) was similar between EC-TH and TCH groups, respectively (log-rank p = 0.550). Three-year (95.5% vs. 92.5%) and five-year (84.4% vs. 80.8%) OSwere also comparable between both groups (log-rank p = 0.485). The anthracycline-containing EC-TH group had a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia (6.4%. vs. 3.6%) and cardiac adverse events (7.7% vs. 4.4%) than the anthracycline-free TCH group.
Neoadjuvant anthracycline-free chemotherapy has similar pCR and survival outcomeswith favourable cardiac and non-cardiac adverse effect profiles compared with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.
曲妥珠单抗联合新辅助化疗(NACT)是治疗早期和局部晚期人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)阳性乳腺癌的首选方法。目前缺乏关于曲妥珠单抗单药治疗中无蒽环类和含蒽环类方案的病理完全缓解(pCR)和生存结局的强有力数据。
本研究回顾性评估了两组患者的 pCR 情况:曲妥珠单抗联合无蒽环类和含蒽环类化疗。
共分析了 215 例接受含蒽环类 EC-TH(表柔比星和环磷酰胺,随后使用多西他赛和曲妥珠单抗)或无蒽环类 TCH(多西他赛、卡铂和曲妥珠单抗)治疗的 HER2 阳性女性乳腺癌患者。单因素和多因素分析确定了生存和 pCR 的预后因素。Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线确定无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)。
两组患者的基线特征无差异。含蒽环类 EC-TH 组的 pCR 率为 30.8%,无蒽环类 TCH 组为 40.9%;p=0.140。3 年(65.8% vs. 58.4%)和 5 年(49.2% vs. 55.2%)DFS 相似,EC-TH 和 TCH 两组间差异无统计学意义(log-rank p=0.550)。两组间 3 年(95.5% vs. 92.5%)和 5 年(84.4% vs. 80.8%)OS 也相似(log-rank p=0.485)。含蒽环类 EC-TH 组发热性中性粒细胞减少症(6.4% vs. 3.6%)和心脏不良事件(7.7% vs. 4.4%)的发生率高于无蒽环类 TCH 组。
与含蒽环类化疗相比,无蒽环类新辅助化疗具有相似的 pCR 和生存结局,且心脏和非心脏不良事件发生率较低。