• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自 AML 患者的样本显示,当地机构与中心实验室的 NGS 检测突变的一致性很高。

Samples from patients with AML show high concordance in detection of mutations by NGS at local institutions vs central laboratories.

机构信息

Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

出版信息

Blood Adv. 2023 Oct 24;7(20):6048-6054. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009008.

DOI:10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009008
PMID:37459200
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10582272/
Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify pathogenic mutations is an integral part of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapeutic decision-making. The concordance in identifying pathogenic mutations among different NGS platforms at different diagnostic laboratories has been studied in solid tumors but not in myeloid malignancies to date. To determine this interlaboratory concordance, we collected a total of 194 AML bone marrow or peripheral blood samples from newly diagnosed patients with AML enrolled in the Beat AML Master Trial (BAMT) at 2 academic institutions. We analyzed the diagnostic samples from patients with AML for the detection of pathogenic myeloid mutations in 8 genes (DNMT3A, FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, NPM1, TET2, TP53, and WT1) locally using the Hematologic Neoplasm Mutation Panel (50-gene myeloid indication filter) (site 1) or the GeneTrails Comprehensive Heme Panel (site 2) at the 2 institutions and compared them with the central results from the diagnostic laboratory for the BAMT, Foundation Medicine, Inc. The overall percent agreement was over 95% each in all 8 genes, with almost perfect agreement (κ > 0.906) in all but WT1, which had substantial agreement (κ = 0.848) when controlling for site. The minimal discrepancies were due to reporting variants of unknown significance (VUS) for the WT1 and TP53 genes. These results indicate that the various NGS methods used to analyze samples from patients with AML enrolled in the BAMT show high concordance, a reassuring finding given the wide use of NGS for therapeutic decision-making in AML.

摘要

下一代测序(NGS)用于鉴定致病性突变是急性髓细胞白血病(AML)治疗决策的重要组成部分。在实体瘤中已经研究了不同诊断实验室的不同 NGS 平台在鉴定致病性突变方面的一致性,但迄今为止尚未在髓系恶性肿瘤中进行研究。为了确定这种实验室间的一致性,我们从 2 个学术机构的 Beat AML 主试验(BAMT)中招募的新诊断 AML 患者共收集了 194 个 AML 骨髓或外周血样本。我们使用局部的血液系统肿瘤突变panel(50 基因髓系指示过滤器)(site1)或在这 2 个机构的 GeneTrails Comprehensive Heme Panel(site2)对患者的诊断样本进行分析,以检测 8 个基因(DNMT3A、FLT3、IDH1、IDH2、NPM1、TET2、TP53 和 WT1)中的致病性髓系突变,并与 BAMT、Foundation Medicine,Inc. 的诊断实验室的中央结果进行比较。在所有 8 个基因中,总体一致性均超过 95%,除 WT1 外,几乎所有基因的一致性均非常好(κ>0.906),当控制 site 时,WT1 基因的一致性也非常好(κ=0.848)。最小的差异是由于 WT1 和 TP53 基因报告的意义不明的变异(VUS)。这些结果表明,用于分析 BAMT 入组的 AML 患者样本的各种 NGS 方法具有高度一致性,鉴于 NGS 在 AML 治疗决策中的广泛应用,这是一个令人放心的发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f43c/10582272/e2bd531194d2/BLOODA_ADV-2022-009008-gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f43c/10582272/4d081a3cf1e3/BLOODA_ADV-2022-009008-ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f43c/10582272/e2bd531194d2/BLOODA_ADV-2022-009008-gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f43c/10582272/4d081a3cf1e3/BLOODA_ADV-2022-009008-ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f43c/10582272/e2bd531194d2/BLOODA_ADV-2022-009008-gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Samples from patients with AML show high concordance in detection of mutations by NGS at local institutions vs central laboratories.来自 AML 患者的样本显示,当地机构与中心实验室的 NGS 检测突变的一致性很高。
Blood Adv. 2023 Oct 24;7(20):6048-6054. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009008.
2
An NGS based MRD evaluation from acute myeloid leukemia patients.基于 NGS 的急性髓系白血病患者微小残留病灶评估。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2023 Jun;45(3):353-359. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.14034. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
3
[Using next generation sequencing technology to analyze gene mutations in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and the impact on prognosis].[利用下一代测序技术分析急性髓系白血病患者的基因突变及其对预后的影响]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Oct 29;99(40):3145-3151. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.40.005.
4
[Association of Next Generation Sequencing Based Genotypic Profiling with MICM Characteristics in NPM1 Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia].[基于下一代测序的基因分型与NPM1突变型急性髓系白血病MICM特征的关联]
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Feb;30(1):56-60. doi: 10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2022.01.010.
5
Genomic Mutation Profiles of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Korea: a Single-Center Experience.韩国急性髓系白血病患者的基因组突变特征:单中心经验。
Clin Lab. 2023 Nov 1;69(11). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2023.230545.
6
Mutation profile of acute myeloid leukaemia in a Chinese cohort by targeted next-generation sequencing.中国队列中通过靶向下一代测序分析的急性髓系白血病的突变特征。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2022 Oct;5(10):e1573. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1573. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
7
Gene mutation analysis using next-generation sequencing and its clinical significance in patients with myeloid neoplasm: A multi-center study from China.基于二代测序的基因突变分析及其在骨髓增生异常肿瘤患者中的临床意义:一项来自中国的多中心研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(8):9332-9350. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5690. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
8
Clinical Utility of Next-Generation Sequencing in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.在急性髓系白血病中的下一代测序的临床实用性。
Mol Diagn Ther. 2020 Feb;24(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s40291-019-00443-9.
9
IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequent genetic alterations in acute myeloid leukemia and confer adverse prognosis in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia with NPM1 mutation without FLT3 internal tandem duplication.IDH1 和 IDH2 突变是急性髓系白血病中常见的遗传改变,并且在伴有 NPM1 突变但无 FLT3 内部串联重复的核型正常急性髓系白血病中具有不良预后。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug 1;28(22):3636-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.3762. Epub 2010 Jun 21.
10
Impact of the variant allele frequency of ASXL1, DNMT3A, JAK2, TET2, TP53, and NPM1 on the outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.ASXL1、DNMT3A、JAK2、TET2、TP53 和 NPM1 变异等位基因频率对新发急性髓系白血病患者结局的影响。
Cancer. 2020 Feb 15;126(4):765-774. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32566. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and molecular characterization of TP53-mutant acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults.成人TP53突变型急性淋巴细胞白血病的临床与分子特征
Blood Cancer J. 2025 Aug 14;15(1):138. doi: 10.1038/s41408-025-01350-5.
2
Criteria for Diagnosis and Molecular Monitoring of NPM1-Mutated AML.NPM1 突变型 AML 的诊断和分子监测标准。
Blood Cancer Discov. 2024 Jan 8;5(1):8-20. doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-23-0144.

本文引用的文献

1
Orthogonal Comparison of Four Plasma NGS Tests With Tumor Suggests Technical Factors are a Major Source of Assay Discordance.四项血浆NGS检测与肿瘤的正交比较表明技术因素是检测不一致的主要来源。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Dec;3:1-9. doi: 10.1200/PO.18.00191.
2
Precision medicine treatment in acute myeloid leukemia using prospective genomic profiling: feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the Beat AML Master Trial.采用前瞻性基因组分析的急性髓细胞白血病精准医学治疗:Beat AML 主试验的可行性和初步疗效。
Nat Med. 2020 Dec;26(12):1852-1858. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1089-8. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
3
MRD in AML: The Role of New Techniques.
急性髓系白血病中的微小残留病:新技术的作用
Front Oncol. 2019 Jul 23;9:655. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00655. eCollection 2019.
4
Challenges in the introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for diagnostics of myeloid malignancies into clinical routine use.将下一代测序(NGS)引入髓系恶性肿瘤的临床常规诊断中所面临的挑战。
Blood Cancer J. 2018 Nov 12;8(11):113. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0148-6.
5
Current status and trends in the diagnostics of AML and MDS.急性髓细胞白血病和骨髓增生异常综合征的诊断现状和趋势。
Blood Rev. 2018 Nov;32(6):508-519. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
6
Molecular Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.急性髓系白血病的分子微小残留病。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 29;378(13):1189-1199. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716863.
7
AML in 2017: Advances in clinical practice.2017年的急性髓系白血病:临床实践进展
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2017 Dec;30(4):283-286. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
8
Characterization of sequence-specific errors in various next-generation sequencing systems.各种新一代测序系统中序列特异性错误的特征分析。
Mol Biosyst. 2016 Mar;12(3):914-22. doi: 10.1039/c5mb00750j.
9
Comparing two assays for clinical genomic profiling: the devil is in the data.比较两种临床基因组分析方法:细节在于数据。
Onco Targets Ther. 2015 Aug 24;8:2237-42. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S88908. eCollection 2015.
10
Evaluation and comparison of two commercially available targeted next-generation sequencing platforms to assist oncology decision making.评估和比较两种市售的靶向新一代测序平台以辅助肿瘤学决策制定。
Onco Targets Ther. 2015 Apr 24;8:959-67. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S81995. eCollection 2015.