Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI.
Blood Adv. 2023 Sep 26;7(18):5470-5479. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010352.
Debate remains over the role of rituximab, a large molecule with reduced central nervous system (CNS) penetration, in therapy for primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). Since 2013, the National Cancer Database has distinguished between chemotherapy and immunotherapy for frontline treatment. In this setting, rituximab would be the only standard frontline immunotherapy. We examined factors associated with the receipt of immunotherapy using a multivariate regression model for relative risk, with a random intercept to account for the hospital-specific treatment selection process. Patients were matched using a 1:1 propensity score to limit possible confounders, and overall survival (OS) was compared in the matched cohort. We identified 4691 patients with PCNSL diagnosed between 2013 and 2018. The use of immunotherapy has increased from 45% in 2013 to 76% in 2018. Immunotherapy use was associated with sociodemographic variables and local (hospital level) preference rather than clinical factors. The main factors associated with reduced use of immunotherapy included male sex, Black race or Hispanic ethnicity (compared with White non-Hispanic), HIV+ status, treatment in a lower-volume hospital, and earlier year of diagnosis. We matched 2830 patients for the survival analysis. Receipt of immunotherapy was associated with a significantly better OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.83). There was heterogeneity according to age, because the advantage of immunotherapy was more pronounced for patients aged ≤75 years (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.80) than for those older than 75 years (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.70-1.08). Overall, our findings support the current trend toward rituximab use, although a nuanced approach should be adopted when treating older patients.
原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)的治疗中,利妥昔单抗(一种穿透中枢神经系统能力较弱的大分子药物)的作用仍存在争议。自 2013 年以来,国家癌症数据库已经区分了一线治疗中的化疗和免疫疗法。在这种情况下,利妥昔单抗将是唯一的标准一线免疫疗法。我们使用相对风险的多变量回归模型来检查接受免疫治疗的相关因素,并使用随机截距来考虑医院特有的治疗选择过程。通过 1:1 倾向评分匹配来限制可能的混杂因素,并在匹配队列中比较总生存期(OS)。我们确定了 2013 年至 2018 年间诊断为 PCNSL 的 4691 名患者。免疫疗法的使用从 2013 年的 45%增加到 2018 年的 76%。免疫疗法的使用与社会人口统计学变量和局部(医院层面)偏好相关,而与临床因素无关。与免疫疗法使用率降低相关的主要因素包括男性、黑人或西班牙裔(与白人非西班牙裔相比)、HIV+状态、在低容量医院接受治疗以及诊断较早。我们对 2830 名患者进行了生存分析匹配。接受免疫治疗与显著更好的 OS 相关(风险比[HR],0.75;95%置信区间[CI],0.67-0.83)。根据年龄存在异质性,因为免疫疗法的优势在≤75 岁的患者中更为明显(HR,0.71;95%CI,0.63-0.80),而在>75 岁的患者中不明显(HR,0.87;95%CI,0.70-1.08)。总体而言,我们的研究结果支持当前使用利妥昔单抗的趋势,尽管在治疗老年患者时应采取细致的方法。