• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较 IDegLira 与基础-餐时胰岛素方案在糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)控制不佳(≥9-15%)的 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性的随机对照临床试验:DUAL HIGH 试验。

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDegLira Versus Basal-Bolus in Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes and Very High HbA1c ≥9-15%: DUAL HIGH Trial.

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Deartment of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2023 Sep 1;46(9):1640-1645. doi: 10.2337/dc22-2426.

DOI:10.2337/dc22-2426
PMID:37459574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10465828/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and HbA1c >9.0-10.0%, guidelines recommend treatment with basal-bolus insulin.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This randomized trial compared the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) and basal-bolus among participants with high HbA1c ≥9.0-15.0%, previously treated with 2 or 3 oral agents and/or basal insulin, allocated (1:1) to basal-bolus (n = 73) or IDegLira (n = 72). The primary end point was noninferiority (0.4%) in HbA1c reduction between groups.

RESULTS

Among 145 participants (HbA1c 10.8% ± 1.3), there was no statistically significant difference in HbA1c reduction (3.18% ± 2.29 vs. 3.00% ± 1.79, P = 0.65; estimated treatment difference (ETD) 0.18%, 95% CI -0.59, 0.94) between the IDegLira and basal-bolus groups. IDegLira resulted in significantly lower rates of hypoglycemia <70 mg/dL (26% vs. 48%, P = 0.008; odds ratio 0.39, 95% CI 0.19, 0.78), and less weight gain (1.24 ± 8.33 vs. 5.84 ± 6.18 kg, P = 0.001; ETD -4.60, 95% CI -7.33, -1.87).

CONCLUSIONS

In participants with T2D and HbA1c ≥9.0-15.0%, IDegLira resulted in similar HbA1c reduction, less hypoglycemia, and less weight gain compared with the basal-bolus regimen.

摘要

目的

在糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)>9.0-10.0%的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者中,指南建议采用基础-餐时胰岛素治疗。

研究设计和方法

本随机试验比较了在糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)≥9.0-15.0%、之前接受过 2 种或 3 种口服药物和/或基础胰岛素治疗的患者中,德谷胰岛素利拉鲁肽注射液(IDegLira)和基础-餐时胰岛素方案的疗效和安全性,这些患者按照 1:1 随机分配到基础-餐时胰岛素组(n=73)或 IDegLira 组(n=72)。主要终点是两组间糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)降幅的非劣效性(0.4%)。

结果

在 145 名参与者(HbA1c 为 10.8%±1.3%)中,两组间 HbA1c 降幅(3.18%±2.29 比 3.00%±1.79,P=0.65;估计治疗差值(ETD)为 0.18%,95%置信区间为-0.59,0.94)无统计学显著差异。IDegLira 组低血糖(<70mg/dL)发生率显著低于基础-餐时胰岛素组(26%比 48%,P=0.008;比值比 0.39,95%置信区间 0.19,0.78),体重增加也更少(1.24±8.33kg 比 5.84±6.18kg,P=0.001;ETD -4.60,95%置信区间-7.33,-1.87)。

结论

在 HbA1c≥9.0-15.0%的 T2D 患者中,与基础-餐时胰岛素方案相比,IDegLira 治疗可使 HbA1c 降幅相似,低血糖发生率更低,体重增加更少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13d5/10465828/1b09ce412fbb/dc222426F0GA.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13d5/10465828/1b09ce412fbb/dc222426F0GA.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13d5/10465828/1b09ce412fbb/dc222426F0GA.jpg

相似文献

1
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDegLira Versus Basal-Bolus in Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes and Very High HbA1c ≥9-15%: DUAL HIGH Trial.一项比较 IDegLira 与基础-餐时胰岛素方案在糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)控制不佳(≥9-15%)的 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性的随机对照临床试验:DUAL HIGH 试验。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Sep 1;46(9):1640-1645. doi: 10.2337/dc22-2426.
2
Evaluation of the Short-Term Cost-Effectiveness of IDegLira Versus Basal Insulin and Basal-Bolus Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Based on Attainment of Clinically Relevant Treatment Targets.基于达到临床相关治疗目标评估德谷胰岛素利拉鲁肽与基础胰岛素和基础-餐时胰岛素强化方案治疗 2 型糖尿病的短期成本-效果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Feb;26(2):143-153. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.19035. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
3
Efficacy and Safety of IDegLira Versus Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Uncontrolled on Metformin and Basal Insulin: The DUAL VII Randomized Clinical Trial.IDegLira 对比二甲双胍和基础胰岛素治疗控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:DUAL VII 随机临床试验。
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):1009-1016. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1114. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
4
DUAL II China: Superior HbA1c reductions and weight loss with insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) versus insulin degludec in a randomized trial of Chinese people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin.DUAL II China:在一项针对中国 2 型糖尿病患者的随机试验中,与基础胰岛素控制不佳的患者相比,德谷胰岛素/利拉鲁肽(IDegLira)可显著降低 HbA1c 水平和减轻体重。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Dec;23(12):2687-2696. doi: 10.1111/dom.14522. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
5
DUAL I China: Improved glycemic control with IDegLira versus its individual components in a randomized trial with Chinese participants with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on oral antidiabetic drugs.DUAL I 中国研究:在一项纳入中国口服降糖药控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的随机试验中,与各自组分相比,德谷胰岛素利拉鲁肽复方制剂改善血糖控制。
J Diabetes. 2022 Jun;14(6):401-413. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13286.
6
Superior efficacy with a fixed-ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with insulin degludec and liraglutide in insulin-naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, open-label, randomized trial.在一项 3 期、开放标签、随机试验中,与胰岛素德谷胰岛素和利拉鲁肽相比,胰岛素德谷胰岛素和利拉鲁肽固定比例组合(IDegLira)在日本 2 型糖尿病胰岛素初治患者中显示出更高的疗效。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Dec;21(12):2674-2683. doi: 10.1111/dom.13856. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
7
Type 2 Diabetes Patients Reach Target Glycemic Control Faster Using IDegLira than Either Insulin Degludec or Liraglutide Given Alone.与单独使用德谷胰岛素或利拉鲁肽相比,使用德谷门冬双胰岛素的2型糖尿病患者能更快达到血糖控制目标。
Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Apr;36(4):293-303. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0376-0.
8
The Benefit of Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide (IDegLira) Compared With Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy is Consistent Across Participant Subgroups With Type 2 Diabetes in the DUAL VII Randomized Trial.在 DUAL VII 随机试验中,与基础-餐时胰岛素治疗相比,德谷胰岛素利拉鲁肽(IDegLira)在 2 型糖尿病的各亚组患者中具有一致的获益。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 May;15(3):636-645. doi: 10.1177/1932296820906888. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
9
Superior HbA1c control with the fixed-ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with a maximum dose of 50 units of insulin degludec in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial.在一项 3 期、双盲、随机临床试验中,与最大剂量 50 单位的德谷胰岛素相比,固定比例的德谷胰岛素和利拉鲁肽(IDegLira)组合可实现更好的 HbA1c 控制,用于日本 2 型糖尿病患者。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Dec;21(12):2694-2703. doi: 10.1111/dom.13859. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
10
Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) was effective across a range of dysglycaemia and body mass index categories in the DUAL V randomized trial.在 DUAL V 随机试验中,德谷胰岛素/利拉鲁肽(IDegLira)在一系列不同的血糖异常和身体质量指数类别中均具有疗效。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jan;20(1):200-205. doi: 10.1111/dom.13043. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Insulin DEgludec/LIraglutide versus multiple daily insulin injections in the transition from hospital to outpatient management assessed by continuous glucose monitoring: the DELI transition trial.通过持续葡萄糖监测评估德谷胰岛素/利拉鲁肽与多次每日胰岛素注射在从医院过渡到门诊管理中的效果:DELI过渡试验
Diabetologia. 2025 Sep;68(9):1899-1907. doi: 10.1007/s00125-025-06446-y. Epub 2025 Aug 4.
2
An overview of randomized clinical trials of fixed-ratio combinations of basal insulin plus GLP-1RA (injectable therapy): Lessons for advancing therapy in people with type 2 diabetes.基础胰岛素与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂固定比例组合的随机临床试验综述(注射疗法):2型糖尿病患者推进治疗的经验教训
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Aug;27 Suppl 7:14-25. doi: 10.1111/dom.16616. Epub 2025 Jul 17.
3

本文引用的文献

1
American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.美国临床内分泌学会临床实践指南:制定糖尿病综合护理计划-2022 更新版。
Endocr Pract. 2022 Oct;28(10):923-1049. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.9. 血糖治疗的药物学方法:《2022 年糖尿病医学诊疗标准》。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S125-S143. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S009.
3
Obesity management as a primary treatment goal for type 2 diabetes: time to reframe the conversation.
Efficacy of Simplifying Complex Insulin Regimen on Glycometabolic Parameters and Target Organ Damage in Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.简化复杂胰岛素治疗方案对2型糖尿病糖代谢参数及靶器官损害的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究
J Diabetes Res. 2025 Apr 15;2025:9141564. doi: 10.1155/jdr/9141564. eCollection 2025.
4
Expert Opinion on Current Trends in the Use of Insulin in the Management of People with Type 2 Diabetes from the South-Eastern European Region and Israel.东南欧地区和以色列2型糖尿病患者胰岛素治疗当前趋势的专家意见
Diabetes Ther. 2024 May;15(5):897-915. doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01556-z. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
5
IDegLira for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.德谷胰岛素治疗 2 型糖尿病:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endocrine. 2024 Mar;83(3):648-658. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03543-z. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
6
Advances in the management of type 2 diabetes in adults.成人2型糖尿病管理的进展
BMJ Med. 2023 Sep 4;2(1):e000372. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000372. eCollection 2023.
7
The 2022 American Diabetes Association Meeting.2022年美国糖尿病协会会议。
J Diabetes. 2022 Jul;14(7):428-433. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13297. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
将肥胖管理作为 2 型糖尿病的主要治疗目标:是时候重新调整对话了。
Lancet. 2022 Jan 22;399(10322):394-405. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01919-X. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
4
Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults, 1999-2018.美国成年人糖尿病治疗和控制的趋势,1999-2018 年。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2219-2228. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2032271.
5
A randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of treating patients with type 2 diabetes and highly elevated HbA1c levels with basal-bolus insulin or a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist plus basal insulin: The SIMPLE study.一项比较基础-餐时胰岛素与胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂联合基础胰岛素治疗糖化血红蛋白水平显著升高的 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性的随机试验:SIMPLE 研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Sep;21(9):2133-2141. doi: 10.1111/dom.13794. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
6
Efficacy and Safety of IDegLira Versus Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Uncontrolled on Metformin and Basal Insulin: The DUAL VII Randomized Clinical Trial.IDegLira 对比二甲双胍和基础胰岛素治疗控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:DUAL VII 随机临床试验。
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):1009-1016. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1114. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
7
Efficacy of Exenatide Plus Pioglitazone Vs Basal/Bolus Insulin in T2DM Patients With Very High HbA1c.艾塞那肽联合吡格列酮与基础/餐时胰岛素治疗糖化血红蛋白水平极高的2型糖尿病患者的疗效比较
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Jul 1;102(7):2162-2170. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-3423.
8
Effect of Insulin Glargine Up-titration vs Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide on Glycated Hemoglobin Levels in Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes: The DUAL V Randomized Clinical Trial.胰岛素甘精胰岛素滴定上调与胰岛素德谷胰岛素/利拉鲁肽对血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白水平的影响:DUAL V 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Mar 1;315(9):898-907. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.1252.
9
Pathophysiologic approach to therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.新诊断2型糖尿病患者治疗的病理生理学方法
Diabetes Care. 2013 Aug;36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S127-38. doi: 10.2337/dcS13-2011.
10
Flexibly timed once-daily dosing with degludec: a new ultra-long-acting basal insulin.德谷胰岛素:一种新型超长效基础胰岛素,灵活的每日一次定时给药。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Dec;15(12):1077-84. doi: 10.1111/dom.12114. Epub 2013 May 6.