Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 May 7;49(5):320-325. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104595.
The optimal techniques of a parasternal intercostal plane (PIP) block to cover the T2-T6 intercostal nerves have not been elucidated. This pilot cadaveric study aims to determine the optimal injection techniques that achieve a consistent dye spread over the second to sixth intercostal spaces after both ultrasound-guided superficial and deep PIP blocks. We also investigated the presence of the transversus thoracis muscle at the first to sixth intercostal spaces and its sonographic identification agreement, as well as the location of the internal thoracic artery in relation to the lateral border of the sternum.
Ultrasound-guided superficial or deep PIP blocks with single, double, or triple injections were applied in 24 hemithoraces (three hemithoraces per technique). A total volume of dye for all techniques was 20 mL. On dissection, dye distribution over the first to sixth intercostal spaces, the presence of the transversus thoracis muscle at each intercostal space and the distance of the internal thoracic artery from the lateral sternal border were recorded.
The transversus thoracis muscles were consistently found at the second to sixth intercostal spaces, and the agreement between sonographic identification and the presence of the transversus thoracis muscles was >80% at the second to fifth intercostal spaces. The internal thoracic artery is located medial to the halfway between the sternal border and costochondral junction along the second to sixth intercostal spaces. Dye spread following the superficial PIP block was more localized than the deep PIP block. For both approaches, the more numbers of injections rendered a wider dye distribution. The numbers of stained intercostal spaces after superficial block at the second, fourth, and fifth intercostal spaces, and deep block at the third and fifth intercostal spaces were 5.3±1.2 and 5.7±0.6 levels, respectively.
Triple injections at the second, fourth, and fifth intercostal spaces for the superficial approach and double injections at the third and fifth intercostal spaces for the deep approach were optimal techniques of the PIP blocks.
尚未阐明经胸骨旁肋间平面(PIP)阻滞以覆盖 T2-T6 肋间神经的最佳技术。本尸检研究旨在确定超声引导下浅表和深部 PIP 阻滞后,可在第二至第六肋间实现一致染料扩散的最佳注射技术。我们还研究了第一至第六肋间横突胸肌的存在及其超声识别一致性,以及胸廓内动脉在胸骨外侧缘的位置。
在 24 个半胸腔(每种技术三个半胸腔)中应用超声引导下的浅表或深部 PIP 阻滞,单次、双次或三次注射。所有技术的染料总量为 20 mL。在解剖时,记录第一至第六肋间的染料分布情况、每个肋间横突胸肌的存在情况以及胸廓内动脉距胸骨外侧缘的距离。
横突胸肌始终存在于第二至第六肋间,超声识别与横突胸肌存在之间的一致性在第二至第五肋间超过 80%。胸廓内动脉位于胸骨外侧缘和肋软骨交界处之间的中点内侧,沿第二至第六肋间分布。浅表 PIP 阻滞后的染料扩散比深部 PIP 阻滞更局限。对于两种方法,注射次数越多,染料分布越广。浅表阻滞在第二、第四和第五肋间和深部阻滞在第三和第五肋间的染色肋间数分别为 5.3±1.2 和 5.7±0.6 个水平。
浅表途径在第二、第四和第五肋间进行三次注射,深部途径在第三和第五肋间进行两次注射是 PIP 阻滞的最佳技术。