Suppr超能文献

量化儿童健康与邻里社会脆弱性之间的关联:指数的选择重要吗?

Quantifying Associations Between Child Health and Neighborhood Social Vulnerability: Does the Choice of Index Matter?

作者信息

Zolotor Anna, Huang Ro W, Bhavsar Nrupen A, Cholera Rushina

机构信息

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences, Duke University.

Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2023 Jul 3:2023.06.20.23291679. doi: 10.1101/2023.06.20.23291679.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Policymakers have increasingly utilized place-based social disadvantage indices to quantify the impacts of place on health and inform equitable resource allocation. Indices vary in design, content, and purpose but are often used interchangeably, potentially resulting in differential assignments of relative disadvantage depending on index choice.

OBJECTIVE

To compare associations between three commonly used disadvantage indices (Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and Child Opportunity Index (COI)) and two epidemiologically distinct child health outcomes-infant well-child check (WCC) attendance and adolescent obesity.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of Duke University Health System electronic health record (EHR) data from January 2014 to December 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

Children ≤18 years of age with outpatient encounters between January 2014 and December 2019, and who were Durham County residents were eligible. WCC attendance was assessed for infants ages 0-15 months; obesity was assessed for children ages 11-17 years.

EXPOSURES

2014 Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), 2015 Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and 2015 Child Opportunity Index (COI) 2.0.

MAIN OUTCOMES

  1. Infant WCC attendance: attending less than the minimum recommended six WCCs in the first 15 months of life, and 2) Adolescent obesity: BMI ≥ the 95th percentile at both the most recent encounter and an encounter within the prior 9-36 months.

RESULTS

Of 10175 patients in the WCC cohort, 20% (n = 2073) had less than six WCCs. Of 14961 patients in the obesity cohort, 20% (n = 2933) had obesity. All three indices were associated with both WCCs (OR for SVI 1.10, 95% CI 1.08-1.12; OR for ADI 1.10, 95% CI 1.08-1.12; OR for COI 1.12, 95% CI 1.10-1.14) and obesity (OR for SVI 1.05, 95% CI 1.04-1.08; OR for ADI 1.08, 95% CI 1.06-1.10; OR for COI 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.08).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Higher social disadvantage as defined by all three indices was similarly associated with both adolescent obesity and decreased infant WCC attendance. While the COI incorporates a broader set of child-specific variables, the SVI and ADI may often be just as suitable for pediatric research. Users should consider population and outcome characteristics when selecting an index.

摘要

重要性

政策制定者越来越多地利用基于地点的社会劣势指数来量化地点对健康的影响,并为公平的资源分配提供信息。这些指数在设计、内容和目的上各不相同,但经常被互换使用,这可能会根据指数的选择导致相对劣势的不同分配。

目的

比较三种常用的劣势指数(社会脆弱性指数(SVI)、地区剥夺指数(ADI)和儿童机会指数(COI))与两种在流行病学上不同的儿童健康结果——婴儿健康检查(WCC)出勤率和青少年肥胖之间的关联。

设计

对2014年1月至2019年12月杜克大学健康系统电子健康记录(EHR)数据进行横断面分析。

参与者

2014年1月至2019年12月期间有门诊就诊记录且为达勒姆县居民的18岁及以下儿童符合条件。对0至15个月大的婴儿进行WCC出勤率评估;对11至17岁的儿童进行肥胖评估。

暴露因素

2014年社会脆弱性指数(SVI)、2015年地区剥夺指数(ADI)和2015年儿童机会指数(COI)2.0。

主要结果

1)婴儿WCC出勤率:在生命的前15个月内参加的WCC少于建议的最少6次;2)青少年肥胖:在最近一次就诊以及前9至36个月内的一次就诊时BMI均≥第95百分位数。

结果

在WCC队列的10175名患者中,20%(n = 2073)的患者WCC次数少于6次。在肥胖队列的14961名患者中,20%(n = 2933)患有肥胖症。所有三个指数均与WCC出勤率(SVI比值比为1.10,95%置信区间为1.08 - 1.12;ADI比值比为1.10,95%置信区间为1.08 - 1.12;COI比值比为1.12,95%置信区间为1.10 - 1.14)和肥胖症(SVI比值比为1.05,95%置信区间为1.04 - 1.08;ADI比值比为1.08,95%置信区间为1.06 - 1.10;COI比值比为1.07,95%置信区间为1.05 - 1.08)相关。

结论与意义

所有三个指数所定义的较高社会劣势与青少年肥胖和婴儿WCC出勤率降低均有类似关联。虽然COI纳入了更广泛的一组特定于儿童的变量,但SVI和ADI通常可能同样适用于儿科研究。用户在选择指数时应考虑人群和结果特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8e7/10350141/ffbc1da13b3c/nihpp-2023.06.20.23291679v2-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验