School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh.
School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh.
Cogn Sci. 2023 Jul;47(7):e13314. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13314.
In the first year of life, infants' speech perception becomes attuned to the sounds of their native language. This process of early phonetic learning has traditionally been framed as phonetic category acquisition. However, recent studies have hypothesized that the attunement may instead reflect a perceptual space learning process that does not involve categories. In this article, we explore the idea of perceptual space learning by implementing five different perceptual space learning models and testing them on three phonetic contrasts that have been tested in the infant speech perception literature. We reproduce and extend previous results showing that a perceptual space learning model that uses only distributional information about the acoustics of short time slices of speech can account for at least some crosslinguistic differences in infant perception. Moreover, we find that a second perceptual space learning model, which benefits from word-level guidance. performs equally well in capturing crosslinguistic differences in infant speech perception. These results provide support for the general idea of perceptual space learning as a theory of early phonetic learning but suggest that more fine-grained data are needed to distinguish between different formal accounts. Finally, we provide testable empirical predictions of the two most promising models and show that these are not identical, making it possible to independently evaluate each model in experiments with infants in future research.
在生命的第一年,婴儿的言语感知能力逐渐适应母语的发音。这个早期语音学习的过程传统上被框架化为语音范畴习得。然而,最近的研究假设,这种适应可能反映了一种不涉及范畴的感知空间学习过程。在本文中,我们通过实施五个不同的感知空间学习模型来探索感知空间学习的概念,并在婴儿言语感知文献中测试了三个语音对比。我们重现并扩展了之前的结果,表明仅使用关于言语短时间切片的声学分布信息的感知空间学习模型可以解释至少一些跨语言婴儿感知差异。此外,我们发现,受益于词级指导的第二个感知空间学习模型在捕捉婴儿言语感知中的跨语言差异方面表现同样出色。这些结果为感知空间学习作为早期语音学习理论的一般性观点提供了支持,但表明需要更精细的数据来区分不同的形式化解释。最后,我们为两个最有前途的模型提供了可检验的经验预测,并表明这些预测并不相同,这使得在未来的婴儿实验中可以独立地评估每个模型。