• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Community-Driven Conversations: Partnership Building through CHEC-Ins.社区驱动的对话:通过 CHEC-Ins 建立伙伴关系。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(1):99-108. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2023.0014.
2
Community-Academic Partnerships to Reduce Cancer Inequities: The ChicagoCHEC Community Engagement Core.减少癌症不平等的社区-学术伙伴关系:芝加哥CHEC社区参与核心
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(5):21-37. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0032.
3
The community engagement course and action network: strengthening community and academic research partnerships to advance health equity.社区参与课程和行动网络:加强社区和学术研究伙伴关系,推进健康公平。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 19;11:1114868. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1114868. eCollection 2023.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Growing partners: building a community-academic partnership to address health disparities in rural North Carolina.不断发展的合作伙伴:建立社区与学术机构的伙伴关系以解决北卡罗来纳州农村地区的健康差异问题。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2014 Summer;8(2):181-6. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2014.0021.
6
The Integration of Community Voice in the Implementation of a Mobile Health Program.社区声音在移动医疗项目实施中的融入。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(1):87-97. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2023.0013.
7
Lessons from a research partnership in southwest England to understand community palliative care needs in rural, coastal and low-income communities.英格兰西南部一项研究合作项目的经验教训,旨在了解农村、沿海和低收入社区的社区姑息治疗需求。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb 28:1-40. doi: 10.3310/ATFA4287.
8
Community engagement to improve access to healthcare: a comparative case study to advance implementation science for transgender health equity.社区参与改善医疗保健服务获取:推进跨性别健康公平实施科学的比较案例研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Jul 31;21(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01702-8.
9
Building Leadership, Capacity, and Power to Advance Health Equity and Justice through Community-Engaged Research in the Midwest.通过美国中西部地区的社区参与研究,建设领导力、能力和力量,以促进健康公平与正义。
Am J Community Psychol. 2021 Mar;67(1-2):195-204. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12462. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
10
Establishing a Framework for Sustainable Community Action Research.建立可持续社区行动研究框架。
Ethn Dis. 2022 Oct 20;32(4):333-340. doi: 10.18865/ed.32.4.333. eCollection 2022 Fall.

本文引用的文献

1
Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) position statement: support increased knowledge and efforts to address the financial burden associated with cancer treatment.行为医学学会(SBM)立场声明:支持增加对癌症治疗相关经济负担的了解和努力。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Jun 17;11(6):1289-1291. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa073.
2
Utilizing Community Engagement Studios to inform patient experience in a multicenter randomized control trial.在一项多中心随机对照试验中利用社区参与工作室来了解患者体验。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jun;133:110007. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110007. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
3
Community-Academic Partnerships to Reduce Cancer Inequities: The ChicagoCHEC Community Engagement Core.减少癌症不平等的社区-学术伙伴关系:芝加哥CHEC社区参与核心
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(5):21-37. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0032.
4
Community-Academic Partnerships: Approaches to Engagement.社区-学术伙伴关系:参与方式
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:88-95. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_246229. Epub 2019 May 17.
5
Society of Behavior Medicine (SBM) Urges Congress to Ensure Affordable Care Act Coverage of Prostate Cancer Screening Support Services for High-Risk Men.行为医学学会(SBM)敦促国会确保《平价医疗法案》涵盖针对高风险男性的前列腺癌筛查支持服务。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 May 20;10(2):492-494. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz034.
6
Enhancing translational researchers' ability to collaborate with community stakeholders: Lessons from the Community Engagement Studio.提高转化研究人员与社区利益相关者合作的能力:来自社区参与工作室的经验教训。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Aug;2(4):201-207. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.323. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
7
Multilevel Examination of Health Disparity: The Role of Policy Implementation in Neighborhood Context, in Patient Resources, and in Healthcare Facilities on Later Stage of Breast Cancer Diagnosis.多层次考察健康差异:政策实施在邻里环境、患者资源和医疗设施方面对乳腺癌诊断后期的作用。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Jan;28(1):59-66. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0945. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
8
Using Garden Cafés to engage community stakeholders in health research.利用花园咖啡馆让社区利益相关者参与健康研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 10;13(8):e0200483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200483. eCollection 2018.
9
Society of Behavioral Medicine position statement: Society of Behavioral Medicine supports oral cancer early detection by all healthcare providers.美国行为医学学会立场声明:美国行为医学学会支持所有医疗保健提供者进行口腔癌早期检测。
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Jul 16;9(4):819-822. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby075.
10
Participatory methods for research prioritization in primary care: an analysis of the World Café approach in Ireland and the USA.基层医疗中研究优先级确定的参与式方法:对爱尔兰和美国世界咖啡馆方法的分析
Fam Pract. 2017 Jun 1;34(3):278-284. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw104.

社区驱动的对话:通过 CHEC-Ins 建立伙伴关系。

Community-Driven Conversations: Partnership Building through CHEC-Ins.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(1):99-108. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2023.0014.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2023.0014
PMID:37462579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11338318/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chicago's systemically underserved communities have disproportionately high cancer rates. The Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative (ChicagoCHEC) brings together academic and community partners to address these health inequities. The community conversations known as "CHEC-Ins" provide a space for community members to voice their experiences and needs and for ChicagoCHEC to fulfill its commitment to advancing health equity through collaboration and action.

OBJECTIVE

This paper presents a community-generated approach to social networking about cancer health issues known as CHEC-Ins. Through this innovative approach, community members and organizations share cancer related information and experiences, as well as needs and concerns, which are then channeled to ChicagoCHEC academic and administrative members who incorporate them into outreach and research activities. In this way, community members set the agenda and the process and collect the information they deem relevant and important. This paper describes the process of organizing and conducting two pilot CHEC-Ins and the model of this approach, which we intend to employ moving forward to advance partnership building and collaborative research practice between academic institutions and community partners and organizations. This paper contributes a unique model of community-generated and led outreach as a cornerstone of the ChicagoCHEC approach to community engagement.

METHODS

The leaders of the ChicagoCHEC Community Steering Committee spearheaded the design and implementation of CHEC-Ins, including developing the question guide and hosting events within their organizations.

LESSONS LEARNED

CHEC-Ins proved to be a valuable strategy for defining the role of community partners and establishing the basis for a bi-directional flow of information, resources, and productive action. The two pilot CHEC-Ins revealed important insights related to sources of cancer information, meanings and associated attitudes, barriers to access and use of health services, and social support systems in the communities where ChicagoCHEC works. We will implement this approach and continue to refine it as we conduct CHECIns moving forward.

摘要

背景

芝加哥服务不足的社区癌症发病率过高,存在严重的系统性不公平问题。芝加哥癌症健康公平合作组织(ChicagoCHEC)汇集了学术和社区合作伙伴,旨在解决这些健康不公平问题。名为“CHEC-Ins”的社区对话为社区成员提供了一个表达自身经历和需求的空间,同时也使 ChicagoCHEC 能够通过合作和行动履行其推进健康公平的承诺。

目的

本文介绍了一种针对癌症健康问题的社区主导社交网络方法,称为 CHEC-Ins。通过这种创新方法,社区成员和组织可以分享与癌症相关的信息和经验,以及需求和关注点,然后将其传递给 ChicagoCHEC 的学术和行政成员,这些成员将其纳入外展和研究活动中。通过这种方式,社区成员设定议程和流程,并收集他们认为相关和重要的信息。本文描述了组织和开展两次试点 CHEC-Ins 的过程以及这种方法的模型,我们打算在未来采用这种方法,以推进学术机构与社区合作伙伴和组织之间的伙伴关系建设和合作研究实践。本文贡献了一种独特的社区主导和领导的外展模式,作为 ChicagoCHEC 社区参与方法的基石。

方法

ChicagoCHEC 社区指导委员会的领导人牵头设计和实施了 CHEC-Ins,包括制定问题指南和在其组织内举办活动。

经验教训

CHEC-Ins 被证明是一种定义社区合作伙伴角色和为信息、资源和富有成效的行动的双向流动奠定基础的有价值策略。两次试点 CHEC-Ins 揭示了与癌症信息来源、意义和相关态度、获取和使用卫生服务的障碍以及 ChicagoCHEC 工作社区中的社会支持系统相关的重要见解。我们将实施这种方法,并在未来继续改进 CHECIns。