• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少癌症不平等的社区-学术伙伴关系:芝加哥CHEC社区参与核心

Community-Academic Partnerships to Reduce Cancer Inequities: The ChicagoCHEC Community Engagement Core.

作者信息

Giachello Aida L, Watson Karriem S, Stuart Moira, Barceló Henrietta, Glenn Joanne, Wang Shan, Navas-Nacher Elena, Nava Magdalena, McKoy June, Riva Erika de, Cooper Jen, Aponte-Soto Lisa, Kanoon Jacqueline, Martinez Erica, Simon Melissa

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(5):21-37. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0032.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2019.0032
PMID:31378729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6984343/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2015, Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative (ChicagoCHEC) was formed to address cancer inequities. The Community Engagement Core (CEC) is one of the key components aimed at establishing meaningful partnerships between the academic institutions and the community. Herein, we describe ChicagoCHEC CEC processes, challenges, opportunities, successes, and preliminary evaluation results.

METHODS

CEC stresses participatory and empowerment approaches in all aspects of ChicagoCHEC work. Evaluation processes were conducted to assess, report back, and respond to community needs and to evaluate the strength of the partnership.

RESULTS

CEC has facilitated meaningful community integration and involvement in all ChicagoCHEC work. The partnership resulted in annual cancer symposium; more than 50 outreach and education activities, including cancer screening and referrals; the development of health resources; and providing expertise in culturally and health literacy appropriate research targeting minorities. Preliminary partnership evaluation results show that ChicagoCHEC researchers and community partners have developed trust and cohesiveness and value the community benefits resulting from the partnership.

CONCLUSIONS

CEC is essential in achieving research objectives following community participatory action research (CPAR) approaches. Some key lessons learned include 1) the need for clear, honest, and open channels of communication not only among the three participating academic institutions, but also among the community partners, 2) transparent operational processes, and 3) mutual trust and understanding regarding the different cultures, structure, foci and processes, expectations at each institution and partnering organization.

摘要

背景

2015年,芝加哥癌症健康公平协作组织(ChicagoCHEC)成立,旨在解决癌症方面的不公平问题。社区参与核心(CEC)是关键组成部分之一,旨在在学术机构和社区之间建立有意义的伙伴关系。在此,我们描述ChicagoCHEC CEC的流程、挑战、机遇、成功之处以及初步评估结果。

方法

CEC在ChicagoCHEC工作的各个方面都强调参与式和赋权方法。开展评估流程以评估、反馈并回应社区需求,以及评估伙伴关系的强度。

结果

CEC促进了社区在ChicagoCHEC所有工作中的有意义融合与参与。这种伙伴关系促成了年度癌症研讨会;开展了50多项外展和教育活动,包括癌症筛查和转诊;开发了健康资源;并在针对少数族裔的具有文化和健康素养适宜性的研究方面提供专业知识。伙伴关系的初步评估结果表明,ChicagoCHEC的研究人员和社区伙伴建立了信任和凝聚力,并重视伙伴关系带来的社区益处。

结论

CEC对于遵循社区参与行动研究(CPAR)方法实现研究目标至关重要。吸取的一些关键经验教训包括:1)不仅在三个参与的学术机构之间,而且在社区伙伴之间都需要清晰、诚实和开放的沟通渠道;2)透明的运营流程;3)对各机构和合作组织的不同文化、结构、重点、流程及期望有相互信任和理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d5/6984343/fdaa56477de1/nihms-1063183-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d5/6984343/1390dce198f6/nihms-1063183-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d5/6984343/8c156cc24c2c/nihms-1063183-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d5/6984343/80595c3d55e4/nihms-1063183-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d5/6984343/6f7f7d9edfbd/nihms-1063183-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d5/6984343/fdaa56477de1/nihms-1063183-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d5/6984343/1390dce198f6/nihms-1063183-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d5/6984343/8c156cc24c2c/nihms-1063183-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d5/6984343/80595c3d55e4/nihms-1063183-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d5/6984343/6f7f7d9edfbd/nihms-1063183-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d5/6984343/fdaa56477de1/nihms-1063183-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Community-Academic Partnerships to Reduce Cancer Inequities: The ChicagoCHEC Community Engagement Core.减少癌症不平等的社区-学术伙伴关系:芝加哥CHEC社区参与核心
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(5):21-37. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0032.
2
Building Cross-Institutional Collaborative Infrastructure and Processes: Early Lessons From the Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative.构建跨机构协作基础设施与流程:来自芝加哥癌症健康公平协作组织的早期经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(5):5-13. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0030.
3
Architecture Matters-Moving Beyond "Business as Usual": The Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative.架构至关重要——超越“常规业务”:芝加哥癌症健康公平协作组织
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(5):1-4. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0029.
4
Community-Driven Conversations: Partnership Building through CHEC-Ins.社区驱动的对话:通过 CHEC-Ins 建立伙伴关系。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(1):99-108. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2023.0014.
5
The Bidirectional Engagement and Equity (BEE) Research Framework to Guide Community-Academic Partnerships: Developed From a Narrative Review and Diverse Stakeholder Perspectives.指导社区-学术伙伴关系的双向参与与公平(BEE)研究框架:基于叙事性综述和多元利益相关者视角制定
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14161. doi: 10.1111/hex.14161.
6
Developing community-academic partnerships to enhance breast health among rural and Hispanic migrant and seasonal farmworker women.建立社区与学术机构的合作伙伴关系,以改善农村及西班牙裔移民和季节性农场女工的乳腺健康。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001 Nov-Dec;28(10):1577-84.
7
The community engagement course and action network: strengthening community and academic research partnerships to advance health equity.社区参与课程和行动网络:加强社区和学术研究伙伴关系,推进健康公平。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 19;11:1114868. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1114868. eCollection 2023.
8
Improving Health Care Career Pipeline Programs for Underrepresented Students: Program Design that Makes a Difference.改善面向代表性不足学生的医疗保健职业培养项目:产生影响的项目设计。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(5):113-122. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0044.
9
Establishing New Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships using the Community-Based Participatory Research Charrette Model: Lessons from the Cancer Health Accountability for Managing Pain and Symptoms Study.使用基于社区的参与式研究工作坊模式建立新的基于社区的参与式研究伙伴关系:癌症疼痛和症状管理健康问责制研究的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(1):89-99. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0010.
10
Building Capacity in Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships Through a Focus on Process and Multiculturalism.通过关注过程和多元文化主义来建设基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系的能力。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):261-73. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0038.

引用本文的文献

1
Community engagement in the context of cancer: scoping review of definitions and measures to inform program-level analysis.癌症背景下的社区参与:关于定义和措施的范围综述,以为项目层面的分析提供信息。
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02026-y.
2
"But if you don't know what my needs are, you can't help me": Health seeking experiences of older Black and Latinx cancer survivors.“但如果你不了解我的需求,就无法帮助我”:年长的黑人和拉丁裔癌症幸存者的就医经历
J Cancer Policy. 2025 Jun;44:100579. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100579. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
3
Design and Implementation of the Diabetes Impact Project: A Multisector Partnership to Reduce Diabetes Burden in Indianapolis Communities.

本文引用的文献

1
Building Cross-Institutional Collaborative Infrastructure and Processes: Early Lessons From the Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative.构建跨机构协作基础设施与流程:来自芝加哥癌症健康公平协作组织的早期经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(5):5-13. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0030.
2
Community-Academic Partnerships: A Systematic Review of the State of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research.社区-学术伙伴关系:文献现状的系统综述及对未来研究的建议
Milbank Q. 2016 Mar;94(1):163-214. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12184.
3
Research for improved health: variability and impact of structural characteristics in federally funded community engaged research.
《糖尿病影响项目的设计与实施:多部门合作减少印第安纳波利斯社区糖尿病负担》。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2023;29(5):675-685. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001779.
4
Community-Driven Conversations: Partnership Building through CHEC-Ins.社区驱动的对话:通过 CHEC-Ins 建立伙伴关系。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(1):99-108. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2023.0014.
5
What Matters to Whom: Patient and Public Involvement in Research.什么对谁重要:患者和公众参与研究。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun 1;65(2):268-276. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000694. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
6
From Cancer Epidemiology to Policy and Practice: the Role of a Comprehensive Cancer Center.从癌症流行病学到政策与实践:综合癌症中心的作用。
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2022;9(1):10-21. doi: 10.1007/s40471-021-00280-7. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
7
A narrative review of sociodemographic risk and disparities in screening, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of the most common extrathoracic malignancies in the United States.对美国最常见胸外恶性肿瘤筛查、诊断、治疗及预后方面的社会人口学风险与差异的叙述性综述。
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Jun;13(6):3827-3843. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-87.
8
Prostate Cancer: Community Education and Disparities in Diagnosis and Treatment.前列腺癌:社区教育与诊断和治疗中的差异。
Oncologist. 2021 Jul;26(7):537-548. doi: 10.1002/onco.13749. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
9
Building Cross-Institutional Collaborative Infrastructure and Processes: Early Lessons From the Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative.构建跨机构协作基础设施与流程:来自芝加哥癌症健康公平协作组织的早期经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(5):5-13. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0030.
10
Architecture Matters-Moving Beyond "Business as Usual": The Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative.架构至关重要——超越“常规业务”:芝加哥癌症健康公平协作组织
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(5):1-4. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0029.
改善健康的研究:联邦资助的社区参与研究中结构特征的变异性和影响
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Spring;9(1):17-29. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0010.
4
Cancer Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs among African Americans.非裔美国人的癌症知识、态度与信念
Ochsner J. 1999 Apr;1(2):52-7.
5
The science of eliminating health disparities: summary and analysis of the NIH summit recommendations.消除健康差异的科学:NIH 峰会建议的总结和分析。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr 1;100 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.191619. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
6
Redes En Acción. Increasing Hispanic participation in cancer research, training, and awareness.行动网络。增加西班牙裔在癌症研究、培训和宣传方面的参与度。
Cancer. 2006 Oct 15;107(8 Suppl):2023-33. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22148.
7
Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities.运用基于社区的参与性研究来解决健康差异问题。
Health Promot Pract. 2006 Jul;7(3):312-23. doi: 10.1177/1524839906289376. Epub 2006 Jun 7.
8
Identifying training and technical assistance needs in community coalitions: a developmental approach.识别社区联盟中的培训和技术援助需求:一种发展性方法。
Health Educ Res. 1993 Sep;8(3):417-32. doi: 10.1093/her/8.3.417.