• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较系统治疗转移性肾细胞癌患者即刻与延迟细胞减瘤性肾切除术:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of upfront versus deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving systemic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology.

Laboratory Medicine Center, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2023 Oct 1;109(10):3178-3188. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000591.

DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000000591
PMID:37462997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10583944/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to conduct a pooled analysis to compare the outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received presurgical systemic therapy [(ST); including immunotherapy and/or targeted therapy] followed by cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) [(deferred CN; (dCN)] with those who underwent upfront CN (uCN) followed by ST.

METHODS

The present study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library database to identify eligible comparative studies up to April 2023. To evaluate their relevance, pooled hazard ratio with 95% CIs were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 3157 patients were included in nine studies. The dCN group was observed to be correlated with superior overall survival (OS) compared to the uCN group (hazard ratio =0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.89, P =0.003). Moreover, the authors conducted subgroup analyses according to the type of ST, sample size, sex, age, and risk score, and observed similar outcomes for OS across most subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrated that dCN may be associated with improved OS compared to uCN in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving ST. However, no significant differences were found between the uCN and dCN groups in the immunotherapy-based combinations subgroup. Further research is needed to confirm these results.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在进行荟萃分析,比较接受术前系统治疗[(ST);包括免疫治疗和/或靶向治疗]后行细胞减灭性肾切除术(CN)[延迟 CN;(dCN)]与直接行 CN 后行 ST 的转移性肾细胞癌患者的结局。

方法

本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明。对 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Cochrane Library 数据库进行全面检索,以确定截至 2023 年 4 月的合格比较研究。为了评估其相关性,计算了合并危险比及其 95%置信区间。

结果

共有 3157 名患者纳入了 9 项研究。与 uCN 组相比,dCN 组的总生存期(OS)显著延长(风险比=0.71,95%CI 0.57-0.89,P=0.003)。此外,作者根据 ST 类型、样本量、性别、年龄和风险评分进行了亚组分析,在大多数亚组中,OS 的结果相似。

结论

这项研究的结果表明,与接受 ST 的转移性肾细胞癌患者直接行 CN 相比,dCN 可能与改善 OS 相关。然而,在基于免疫治疗的联合治疗亚组中,uCN 和 dCN 组之间未发现 OS 存在显著差异。需要进一步的研究来证实这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/10583944/1fe836d6c115/js9-109-3178-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/10583944/f119467ec212/js9-109-3178-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/10583944/cc37e8ac6cb3/js9-109-3178-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/10583944/9450a3f9a543/js9-109-3178-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/10583944/0e24dd6debd0/js9-109-3178-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/10583944/5f6a438ffbe0/js9-109-3178-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/10583944/892561b97f7d/js9-109-3178-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/10583944/1fe836d6c115/js9-109-3178-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/10583944/f119467ec212/js9-109-3178-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/10583944/cc37e8ac6cb3/js9-109-3178-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/10583944/9450a3f9a543/js9-109-3178-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/10583944/0e24dd6debd0/js9-109-3178-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/10583944/5f6a438ffbe0/js9-109-3178-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/10583944/892561b97f7d/js9-109-3178-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/10583944/1fe836d6c115/js9-109-3178-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of upfront versus deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving systemic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较系统治疗转移性肾细胞癌患者即刻与延迟细胞减瘤性肾切除术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2023 Oct 1;109(10):3178-3188. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000591.
2
Deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.延迟性细胞减少性肾切除术治疗转移性肾细胞癌的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urol Oncol. 2023 Mar;41(3):125-136. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.09.021. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
3
Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.新诊断转移性肾细胞癌患者的延迟细胞减少性肾切除术。
Eur Urol. 2020 Oct;78(4):615-623. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.038. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
4
Upfront Versus Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.转移性肾细胞癌中 upfront 与延迟性减瘤性肾切除术的比较:一项系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析
Eur Urol Focus. 2025 Jan;11(1):100-108. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.08.002. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
5
Characterization of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Deferred, Upfront, or No Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the Era of Combination Immunotherapy: Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium.联合免疫治疗时代接受延迟性、先行性或不进行减瘤性肾切除术的转移性肾细胞癌患者的特征:国际转移性肾细胞癌数据库联盟的结果
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Jun;7(3):501-508. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
6
Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Following Presurgical Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-targeted Therapy in Patients with Primary Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Pooled Analysis of Prospective Trial Data.血管内皮生长因子受体靶向治疗后行延迟性细胞减瘤性肾切除术治疗原发性转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌患者:前瞻性试验数据的汇总分析。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Apr;3(2):168-173. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.12.004. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
7
Systematic Review of the Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the Targeted Therapy Era and Beyond: An Individualized Approach to Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.系统评价细胞减积性肾切除术在靶向治疗时代及以后的作用:转移性肾细胞癌的个体化治疗方法。
Eur Urol. 2019 Jan;75(1):111-128. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
8
The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the targeted therapy and immunological therapy era: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在靶向治疗和免疫治疗时代,细胞减积性肾切除术在转移性肾细胞癌中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2023 Apr 1;109(4):982-994. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000314.
9
The Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Multi-Institutional Analysis.细胞减积性肾切除术在转移性肾细胞癌中的作用:一项真实世界的多机构分析。
J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):71-79. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002495. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
10
A multicenter study assessing survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with and without cytoreductive nephrectomy.一项多中心研究评估了接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗联合或不联合细胞减灭性肾切除术的转移性肾细胞癌患者的生存情况。
Urol Oncol. 2023 Jan;41(1):51.e25-51.e31. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.08.013. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-World Impact of Upfront Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with First-Line Immunotherapy Combinations or Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (A Sub-Analysis from the ARON-1 Retrospective Study).一线免疫治疗联合方案或酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗转移性非透明细胞肾细胞癌中 upfront 细胞减瘤性肾切除术的真实世界影响(来自 ARON-1 回顾性研究的亚分析)。
Target Oncol. 2024 Jul;19(4):587-599. doi: 10.1007/s11523-024-01065-w. Epub 2024 May 5.