Roider Laura A, Nguyen David C, Pusapadi Ramkumar Shreya, Tyson Cody V, Lund Herluf G, Plikaitis Christina M
From the Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo.
Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jul 17;11(7):e5139. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005139. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Despite the increasing prevalence of breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, there remains a paucity of literature guiding management of asymptomatic patients with textured breast implants. This risk can be anxiety provoking in breast reconstruction patients given their history of cancer or increased future risk. The purpose of this study is to evaluate current practice trends when managing the concerned asymptomatic patient following textured implant-based breast reconstruction.
An electronic survey was distributed to members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, regarding management of asymptomatic breast reconstruction patients with textured devices. Anonymous responses were collected, and statistical analysis was performed.
A total of 304 responses were received. Of respondents, 237 (92%) have managed asymptomatic patients with textured devices. Historically, the overwhelming majority (89%) used textured devices; however, only 25% report current use. Regarding management of asymptomatic breast reconstruction patients, 87% recommend conservative management, while 13% recommend surgical management. When surgery is performed, 16.3% of respondents elected for implant exchange, 33.8% recommended implant exchange with partial capsulectomy, and 49.8% elected for implant exchange with total capsulectomy. Evaluation of practice patterns based on demographics demonstrated statistically significant differences in current use of textured devices and management of acellular dermal matrix.
Despite decreased current use, there is a significant population of asymptomatic breast reconstruction patients with a history of textured devices concerned for risk of breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. This survey demonstrates ongoing variability in surgeon recommendations regarding conservative and surgical management of these patients and the need for continued development of evidence-based guidelines.
尽管乳房植入物相关间变性大细胞淋巴瘤的患病率不断上升,但指导无症状乳房植入物患者管理的文献仍然匮乏。鉴于乳房重建患者有癌症病史或未来风险增加,这种风险可能会引发焦虑。本研究的目的是评估在基于纹理植入物的乳房重建后管理相关无症状患者时的当前实践趋势。
向美国整形外科医师协会成员分发了一份电子调查问卷,内容涉及使用纹理装置的无症状乳房重建患者的管理。收集匿名回复并进行统计分析。
共收到304份回复。在受访者中,237人(92%)曾管理过使用纹理装置的无症状患者。从历史上看,绝大多数(89%)使用纹理装置;然而,只有25%的人报告目前仍在使用。关于无症状乳房重建患者的管理,87%的人建议保守管理,而13%的人建议手术管理。当进行手术时,16.3%的受访者选择更换植入物,33.8%的人建议更换植入物并进行部分囊切除术,49.8%的人选择更换植入物并进行全囊切除术。根据人口统计学对实践模式进行评估,结果显示在纹理装置的当前使用和无细胞真皮基质的管理方面存在统计学上的显著差异。
尽管目前使用量有所下降,但仍有相当一部分有纹理装置使用史的无症状乳房重建患者担心乳房植入物相关间变性大细胞淋巴瘤的风险。这项调查表明,外科医生在这些患者的保守和手术管理建议方面存在持续的差异,并且需要继续制定基于证据的指南。