Jacobsen Henrik Børsting, Brun Aurora, Stubhaug Audun, Reme Silje Endresen
The Mind Body Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo 0373, Norway.
Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo 0853, Norway.
Brain Commun. 2023 Jul 5;5(4):fcad194. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad194. eCollection 2023.
This study aimed to explore the influence of chronic stress, measured through hair cortisol, on executive functions in individuals with chronic pain. We expected that there would be significant differences in chronic stress and executive functioning between pain patients and healthy controls, as well as between primary and secondary pain classifications. We also hypothesized that hair cortisol concentration was predictive of worse performance on tests of executive functions, controlling for objective and subjective covariates. For this study, 122 participants provided a hair sample ( = 40 with fibromyalgia; = 24 with peripheral neuropathic pain; = 58 matched healthy controls). Eighty-four of these participants also completed highly detailed testing of executive functions ( = 40 with fibromyalgia; = 24 with peripheral neuropathic pain; = 20 healthy controls). To assess differences in stress levels and executive functions, -tests were used to compare patients with controls as well as fibromyalgia with peripheral neuropathic pain. Then, univariate regressions were used to explore associations between stress and executive functioning in both chronic pain classifications. Any significant univariate associations were carried over to hierarchical multivariate regression models. We found that patients with chronic pain had significantly higher cortisol levels than healthy controls, but all groups showed similar executive functioning. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses disclosed that in a model controlling for age, sex and pain medication usage, hair cortisol levels explained 8% of the variance in spatial working memory strategy in individuals with chronic pain. The overall model explained 24% of the variance in spatial working memory. In a second model using imputed data, including both objective and subjectively reported covariates, hair cortisol levels explained 9% of the variance, and the full model 31% of the variance in spatial working memory performance. Higher levels of cortisol indicated worse performance. In this study, an applied measure of chronic stress, namely hair cortisol, explained a substantial part of the variance on a spatial working memory task. The current results have important implications for understanding and treating cognitive impairments in chronic pain.
本研究旨在探讨通过头发皮质醇测量的慢性应激对慢性疼痛患者执行功能的影响。我们预计,疼痛患者与健康对照之间以及原发性和继发性疼痛分类之间在慢性应激和执行功能方面会存在显著差异。我们还假设,在控制客观和主观协变量的情况下,头发皮质醇浓度可预测执行功能测试中的较差表现。在本研究中,122名参与者提供了头发样本(40名纤维肌痛患者;24名周围神经性疼痛患者;58名匹配的健康对照)。其中84名参与者还完成了高度详细的执行功能测试(40名纤维肌痛患者;24名周围神经性疼痛患者;20名健康对照)。为了评估应激水平和执行功能的差异,采用t检验比较患者与对照以及纤维肌痛患者与周围神经性疼痛患者。然后,使用单变量回归来探索两种慢性疼痛分类中应激与执行功能之间的关联。任何显著的单变量关联都被纳入分层多变量回归模型。我们发现,慢性疼痛患者的皮质醇水平显著高于健康对照,但所有组的执行功能相似。分层多元回归分析表明,在控制年龄、性别和疼痛药物使用的模型中,头发皮质醇水平解释了慢性疼痛患者空间工作记忆策略中8%的方差。总体模型解释了空间工作记忆中24%的方差。在使用估算数据的第二个模型中,包括客观和主观报告的协变量,头发皮质醇水平解释了9%的方差,完整模型解释了空间工作记忆表现中31%的方差。皮质醇水平越高表明表现越差。在本研究中,一种慢性应激的应用测量方法,即头发皮质醇,解释了空间工作记忆任务中方差的很大一部分。当前结果对理解和治疗慢性疼痛中的认知障碍具有重要意义。