Swiss HPB and Transplant Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Ann Surg. 2023 Nov 1;278(5):748-755. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006012. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
This study aims at establishing benchmark values for best achievable outcomes following open major anatomic hepatectomy for liver tumors of all dignities.
Outcomes after open major hepatectomies vary widely lacking reference values for comparisons among centers, indications, types of resections, and minimally invasive procedures.
A standard benchmark methodology was used covering consecutive patients, who underwent open major anatomic hepatectomy from 44 high-volume liver centers from 5 continents over a 5-year period (2016-2020). Benchmark cases were low-risk non-cirrhotic patients without significant comorbidities treated in high-volume centers (≥30 major liver resections/year). Benchmark values were set at the 75th percentile of median values of all centers. Minimum follow-up period was 1 year in each patient.
Of 8044 patients, 2908 (36%) qualified as benchmark (low-risk) cases. Benchmark cutoffs for all indications include R0 resection ≥78%; liver failure (grade B/C) ≤10%; bile leak (grade B/C) ≤18%; complications ≥grade 3 and CCI ® ≤46% and ≤9 at 3 months, respectively. Benchmark values differed significantly between malignant and benign conditions so that reference values must be adjusted accordingly. Extended right hepatectomy (H1, 4-8 or H4-8) disclosed a higher cutoff for liver failure, while extended left (H1-5,8 or H2-5,8) were associated with higher cutoffs for bile leaks, but had superior oncologic outcomes, when compared to formal left hepatectomy (H1-4 or H2-4). The minimal follow-up for a conclusive outcome evaluation following open anatomic major resection must be 3 months.
These new benchmark cutoffs for open major hepatectomy provide a powerful tool to convincingly evaluate other approaches including parenchymal-sparing procedures, laparoscopic/robotic approaches, and alternative treatments, such as ablation therapy, irradiation, or novel chemotherapy regimens.
本研究旨在为所有分级的肝脏肿瘤开放大解剖肝切除术获得最佳疗效建立基准值。
开放大肝切除术的结果差异很大,缺乏中心间、适应证、切除类型和微创治疗的参考值比较。
使用标准基准方法,覆盖了来自 5 大洲 44 个大容量肝脏中心的连续患者,这些患者在 5 年内(2016-2020 年)接受了开放大解剖肝切除术。基准病例为无严重合并症的低风险非肝硬化患者,在大容量中心(每年≥30 例大肝切除术)接受治疗。基准值设定为所有中心中位数的第 75 个百分位数。每位患者的最低随访时间为 1 年。
在 8044 例患者中,2908 例(36%)符合基准(低风险)病例标准。所有适应证的基准截止值包括 R0 切除≥78%;肝功能衰竭(B/C 级)≤10%;胆漏(B/C 级)≤18%;并发症≥3 级和 CCI ® ≤46%,分别为 3 个月时≤9 和≤9。恶性和良性条件下的基准值差异显著,因此必须相应调整参考值。扩大右半肝切除术(H1、4-8 或 H4-8)显示肝功能衰竭的截止值较高,而扩大左半肝切除术(H1-5、8 或 H2-5、8)与胆漏的截止值较高相关,但与正式左半肝切除术(H1-4 或 H2-4)相比,具有更好的肿瘤学结果。开放解剖性大切除术获得明确疗效评估的最小随访时间必须为 3 个月。
这些新的开放大肝切除术基准截止值为评估包括保肝手术、腹腔镜/机器人手术和替代治疗(如消融治疗、放疗或新型化疗方案)等其他方法提供了有力工具。