• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童经皮中心静脉置管术:静脉通路的一线选择。

Percutaneous central venous catheterization in children: first line choice for venous access.

作者信息

Newman B M, Jewett T C, Karp M P, Cooney D R

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 1986 Aug;21(8):685-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(86)80387-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3468(86)80387-6
PMID:3746602
Abstract

Percutaneous central venous (CV) catheters using the jugular and subclavian veins have been widely used for hemodynamic monitoring and for venous access in difficult clinical situations. However, peripheral venous cutdowns (PVC) still remain the primary mode of short-term venous access in children. To evaluate percutaneous CV line insertion as a routine procedure, a prospective study of 115 patients (75 CV and 40 PVC) was performed. Ages ranged from 1 day to 17 years; age and weight were similar in both groups. Eighty-three CV lines were attempted, with a success rate of 93%, while 82% of 49 PVC insertions were successful. Complications occurred in 11 (14%) patients with CV access and 31 (78%) with PVC lines. In the latter group, poor flow was a problem in 65%, infiltration in 37.5%, and phlebitis in 27.5%. In the CV group, arterial puncture occurred during insertion in 2 (3%) patients with no adverse sequelae, catheter slippage occurred in 4 (5%), and poor flow in 2 (3%). A large majority (79.2%) of CV lines functioned successfully until no longer needed, as compared with 15% of PVC catheters. The latter were removed before completion of treatment because of poor flow (40%), phlebitis (20%), or catheter problems (10%). Catheter sepsis was documented in only one CV line. Two cutdowns had major local infections. The average catheter longevity was 10.2 days for CV lines, 4.1 days for PVC.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

经皮颈内静脉和锁骨下静脉中心静脉(CV)导管已广泛用于血流动力学监测以及困难临床情况下的静脉通路建立。然而,外周静脉切开术(PVC)仍是儿童短期静脉通路的主要方式。为评估经皮CV置管作为常规操作的情况,对115例患者(75例CV置管和40例PVC置管)进行了一项前瞻性研究。年龄范围为1天至17岁;两组的年龄和体重相似。尝试进行了83例CV置管,成功率为93%,而49例PVC置管的成功率为82%。CV置管患者中有11例(14%)发生并发症,PVC置管患者中有31例(78%)发生并发症。在后一组中,65%存在血流不佳问题,37.5%发生渗漏,27.5%发生静脉炎。在CV组中,2例(3%)患者置管时发生动脉穿刺,无不良后遗症,4例(5%)发生导管移位,2例(3%)存在血流不佳。绝大多数(79.2%)的CV导管在不再需要之前功能良好,相比之下,PVC导管为15%。后者因血流不佳(40%)、静脉炎(20%)或导管问题(10%)在治疗完成前被拔除。仅1例CV导管记录有导管败血症。2例静脉切开术发生严重局部感染。CV导管的平均留置时间为10.2天,PVC导管为4.1天。(摘要截短至250字)

相似文献

1
Percutaneous central venous catheterization in children: first line choice for venous access.儿童经皮中心静脉置管术:静脉通路的一线选择。
J Pediatr Surg. 1986 Aug;21(8):685-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(86)80387-6.
2
Upper body central venous catheters in pediatric cardiac surgery.小儿心脏手术中的上肢中心静脉导管
Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Nov;23(11):980-8. doi: 10.1111/pan.12261. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
3
Central venous catheter insertion by femoral vein: safety and effectiveness for the pediatric patient.经股静脉插入中心静脉导管:对儿科患者的安全性和有效性。
Pediatrics. 1986 Jun;77(6):842-7.
4
A Randomized Controlled Comparison of the Internal Jugular Vein and the Subclavian Vein as Access Sites for Central Venous Catheterization in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.小儿心脏手术中颈内静脉与锁骨下静脉作为中心静脉置管穿刺部位的随机对照比较
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Sep;17(9):e413-9. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000878.
5
Mechanical and infectious complications of central venous cannulation in children: lessons learned from a 10-year experience placing more than 1000 catheters.儿童中心静脉置管的机械性和感染性并发症:从10年放置1000余根导管的经验中吸取的教训
J Burn Care Res. 2006 Sep-Oct;27(5):713-8. doi: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000238087.12064.E0.
6
Subclavian venous catheterization in children.儿童锁骨下静脉置管术
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1985 Oct;29(7):733-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1985.tb02290.x.
7
Ultrasound-guided external jugular vein cannulation for central venous access by inexperienced trainees.超声引导下的颈外静脉置管术在无经验学员中建立中心静脉通路。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Mar;27(3):300-3. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328333c2d6.
8
Intravascular Complications of Central Venous Catheterization by Insertion Site.经插入部位的中心静脉导管相关的血管内并发症
N Engl J Med. 2015 Sep 24;373(13):1220-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500964.
9
To reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections: is the subclavian route better than the jugular route for central venous catheterization?为减少导管相关血流感染:中心静脉置管时锁骨下途径是否优于颈内静脉途径?
J Infect Chemother. 2006 Dec;12(6):363-5. doi: 10.1007/s10156-006-0471-x. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
10
External jugular Groshong catheter is associated with fewer complications than a subclavian Argyle catheter.颈外静脉Groshong导管比锁骨下阿盖尔导管的并发症更少。
Eur Surg Res. 2008;40(2):197-202. doi: 10.1159/000110861. Epub 2007 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Central venous catheter placement in children: a prospective study of complications in a Brazilian public hospital.儿童中心静脉导管置入:巴西一家公立医院并发症的前瞻性研究。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2006 Jun;22(6):536-40. doi: 10.1007/s00383-006-1671-2. Epub 2006 May 5.
2
Clinical review: vascular access for fluid infusion in children.临床综述:儿童液体输注的血管通路
Crit Care. 2004 Dec;8(6):478-84. doi: 10.1186/cc2880. Epub 2004 Jun 3.
3
Pathogenesis of infections related to intravascular catheterization.与血管内导管插入术相关感染的发病机制。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993 Apr;6(2):176-92. doi: 10.1128/CMR.6.2.176.
4
Sonographic detection of internal jugular vein thrombosis after central venous catheterization in the newborn period.
Pediatr Radiol. 1994;24(8):577-80. doi: 10.1007/BF02012737.