• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体间使用个人声音放大产品对噪声下言语感知益处的差异:一项随机交叉临床试验。

Interindividual variability in the benefits of personal sound amplification products on speech perception in noise: A randomized cross-over clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jul 19;18(7):e0288434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288434. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0288434
PMID:37467243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10355429/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aging population is prone to hearing loss, which has several adverse effects on quality of life, including difficulty following conversations in noisy environments. Personal Sound Amplification Products (PSAPs) are a less expensive, over-the-counter alternative to traditional, more expensive hearing aids. Although some studies have shown that PSAPs can mitigate hearing loss, the literature generally only addresses group differences without considering interindividual variability. This study aimed to 1) determine how PSAPs affect listening effort and speech perception in noise and 2) measure interindividual variability and identify contributing demographic and health factors.

DESIGN

We used a cross-over design in which all participants were assigned to each condition.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-eight adults aged 60 to 87 years with normal hearing and mild hearing loss fulfilled the study requirements.

INTERVENTION

In one session, speech-in-noise perception tasks were performed without PSAPs, and in the other, the tasks were performed with bilateral PSAPs. The two sessions were separated by one week, and the order of the sessions was balanced across participants.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

In both sessions, participants performed the Quick speech-in-noise test and a word discrimination task in noise, in which their self-reported listening effort was measured.

RESULTS

PSAPs use improved speech perception in noise in both tasks and reduced listening effort. There was considerable variability between individuals, with approximately 60-70% of participants showing benefit. Age, hearing and cognitive status were significant predictors of the benefits.

CONCLUSION

Not all individuals may benefit from the effect of PSAPs to the same extent at their first use, and this depends on specific health and demographic factors, particularly age, hearing, and cognitive status. These results underscore the importance of demographic and health factors in assessing the benefits of hearing amplification in older adults.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05076045.

摘要

目的

人口老龄化容易导致听力损失,这对生活质量有几个不利影响,包括在嘈杂环境中难以跟上对话。个人声音增强产品(PSAP)是一种更便宜的、非处方的替代传统、更昂贵的助听器的选择。尽管一些研究表明 PSAP 可以减轻听力损失,但文献通常只解决群体差异,而不考虑个体间的可变性。本研究旨在:1)确定 PSAP 如何影响噪声中的听力努力和言语感知;2)测量个体间的可变性,并确定促成的人口统计学和健康因素。

设计

我们使用交叉设计,所有参与者都被分配到每个条件。

参与者

28 名年龄在 60 至 87 岁之间、听力正常和轻度听力损失的成年人符合研究要求。

干预

在一个会话中,不使用 PSAP 进行噪声中的言语感知任务,而在另一个会话中,使用双侧 PSAP 进行任务。两个会话之间相隔一周,会话的顺序在参与者之间平衡。

主要观察指标

在两个会话中,参与者都执行了 Quick 噪声中的言语测试和噪声中的单词辨别任务,同时测量了他们的自我报告的听力努力。

结果

PSAP 在两个任务中都改善了噪声中的言语感知,并减少了听力努力。个体之间存在相当大的可变性,约 60-70%的参与者受益。年龄、听力和认知状态是受益的显著预测因素。

结论

并非所有个体在首次使用 PSAP 时都能从其效果中获得相同程度的益处,这取决于特定的健康和人口统计学因素,特别是年龄、听力和认知状态。这些结果强调了在评估老年人大声放大的益处时,人口统计学和健康因素的重要性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT05076045。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a187/10355429/3e2ba49bb566/pone.0288434.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a187/10355429/6822fd6b48ac/pone.0288434.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a187/10355429/9ab4e68a3c8a/pone.0288434.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a187/10355429/7be015285aba/pone.0288434.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a187/10355429/d8a184d1d7e0/pone.0288434.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a187/10355429/e74dce9addb3/pone.0288434.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a187/10355429/3e2ba49bb566/pone.0288434.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a187/10355429/6822fd6b48ac/pone.0288434.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a187/10355429/9ab4e68a3c8a/pone.0288434.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a187/10355429/7be015285aba/pone.0288434.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a187/10355429/d8a184d1d7e0/pone.0288434.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a187/10355429/e74dce9addb3/pone.0288434.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a187/10355429/3e2ba49bb566/pone.0288434.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Interindividual variability in the benefits of personal sound amplification products on speech perception in noise: A randomized cross-over clinical trial.个体间使用个人声音放大产品对噪声下言语感知益处的差异:一项随机交叉临床试验。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 19;18(7):e0288434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288434. eCollection 2023.
2
A Comparison of Personal Sound Amplification Products and Hearing Aids in Ecologically Relevant Test Environments.个人声音放大产品与助听器在生态相关测试环境中的比较
Am J Audiol. 2018 Dec 6;27(4):581-593. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJA-18-0027.
3
Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.老年人使用非线性频率压缩助听器的噪声言语感知和聆听努力。
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):215-225. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000481.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Personal Sound Amplification Products Versus Hearing Aids for Unilateral Hearing Loss: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Trial.个人声音增强产品与助听器治疗单侧听力损失的比较效果:一项前瞻性随机交叉试验。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Jun 17;39(23):e179. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e179.
5
Clinical Performance Evaluation of a Personal Sound Amplification Product vs a Basic Hearing Aid and a Premium Hearing Aid.个人声音放大产品与基本助听器和高级助听器的临床性能评估。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jun 1;145(6):516-522. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.0667.
6
Effectiveness of an Over-the-Counter Self-fitting Hearing Aid Compared With an Audiologist-Fitted Hearing Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial.非处方自助式助听器与听力学家验配助听器的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun 1;149(6):522-530. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0376.
7
Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.成人单侧重度或极重度感音神经性聋两种骨导式助听系统声音处理器在噪声下言语辨别力和方向听力的比较。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Aug;34(6):1064-70. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31828bb781.
8
Hearing and Speech Perception for People With Hearing Loss Using Personal Sound Amplification Products.使用个人声音放大产品改善听力损失人士的听力和言语感知
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Mar 28;37(12):e94. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e94.
9
Measuring listening effort: driving simulator versus simple dual-task paradigm.测量听力努力程度:驾驶模拟器与简单双任务范式
Ear Hear. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(6):623-32. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000079.
10
Cogmed Training Does Not Generalize to Real-World Benefits for Adult Hearing Aid Users: Results of a Blinded, Active-Controlled Randomized Trial.Cogmed 训练对成人助听器使用者的实际收益没有推广作用:一项盲法、主动对照随机试验的结果。
Ear Hear. 2022 May/Jun;43(3):741-763. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001096.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapid Brain Adaptation to Hearing Amplification: A Randomized Crossover Trial of Personal Sound Amplification Products.大脑对听力放大的快速适应:个人声音放大产品的随机交叉试验
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165251375891. doi: 10.1177/23312165251375891. Epub 2025 Sep 5.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Personal Sound Amplification Products Versus Hearing Aids for Unilateral Hearing Loss: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Trial.个人声音增强产品与助听器治疗单侧听力损失的比较效果:一项前瞻性随机交叉试验。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Jun 17;39(23):e179. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e179.

本文引用的文献

1
Audiometric Findings in Senior Adults of 80 Years and Older.80岁及以上老年人的听力测定结果
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 20;13:861555. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.861555. eCollection 2022.
2
Prevalence of Hearing Loss and Hearing Aid Use Among Adults in France in the CONSTANCES Study.法国 CONSTANCES 研究中成年人听力损失和助听器使用的流行率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2217633. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.17633.
3
Neural Plasticity Induced by Hearing Aid Use.使用助听器诱导的神经可塑性。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 May 19;14:884917. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.884917. eCollection 2022.
4
Objective and Subjective Hearing Difficulties Are Associated With Lower Inhibitory Control.客观和主观听力障碍与较低的抑制控制能力相关。
Ear Hear. 2022;43(6):1904-1916. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001227. Epub 2022 May 11.
5
Comparison of personal sound amplification products and conventional hearing aids for patients with hearing loss: A systematic review with meta-analysis.个人扩音产品与传统助听器对听力损失患者的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Apr 7;46:101378. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101378. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Hearing and Speech Perception for People With Hearing Loss Using Personal Sound Amplification Products.使用个人声音放大产品改善听力损失人士的听力和言语感知
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Mar 28;37(12):e94. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e94.
7
Factors Influencing Hearing Aid Adoption in Patients With Hearing Loss in Korea.韩国听力损失患者助听设备采用的影响因素。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Jan 10;37(2):e11. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e11.
8
Improving speech perception in noise in young and older adults using transcranial magnetic stimulation.经颅磁刺激改善年轻和老年成年人在噪声环境中的言语感知能力。
Brain Lang. 2021 Nov;222:105009. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105009. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
9
The frontotemporal organization of the arcuate fasciculus and its relationship with speech perception in young and older amateur singers and non-singers.弓状束的额颞组织及其与年轻和老年业余歌唱者和非歌唱者言语感知的关系。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Jul;42(10):3058-3076. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25416. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
10
Hearing aid affordability in the United States.美国助听器的可负担性
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Apr;18(3):246-252. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1822449. Epub 2020 Oct 28.