• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于心理化的青少年精神病性谱系障碍治疗:欧洲儿童与青少年精神疾病研究中青少年的临床概况及治疗结果

Mentalization based treatment of youth on the psychotic spectrum: clinical profiles and outcomes for youth in the ECID.

作者信息

Dangerfield Mark, Brotnow Decker Line

机构信息

Vidal and Barraquer University Institute of Mental Health, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.

Yale Child Study Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 4;14:1206511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1206511. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1206511
PMID:37469356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10352583/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Early intervention may significantly improve the prognosis associated with psychotic disorders in adulthood.

METHODS

The present study examined the acceptability and effectiveness of a standalone intensive, in-home, mentalization-based treatment (MBT) for extremely high-risk, non-help-seeking youth on the psychotic spectrum [Equipo Clínico de Intervención a Domicilio (ECID), Home Intervention Clinical Team].

RESULTS

Despite previously being unable to participate in treatment, more than 90% of youth engaged and those on the psychotic spectrum demonstrated slightly higher engagement than the general high-risk group (95% and 85%, respectively, = 4.218, = 0.049). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models revealed no main group effect on the likelihood of reengaging with school over the first 12 months of treatment ( = 1.015, = 0.314) when controlling for the duration of school absenteeism at intake. Overall, the percentage of school engagement rose from 12 to 55 over this period, more than 40% of the total sample experienced clinically reliable change and an additional 50% appeared clinically stable. No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in the average change in HoNOSCA total severity score ( = 0.249, = 0.618) or the distribution of youth into categories of clinical change during the first year of treatment ( = 0.068, = 0.795).

DISCUSSION

The present findings suggest that a mentalization based intervention may be able to engage extremely high-risk youth in treatment and have clinically meaningful impact on symptom severity and functioning after 12 months.

摘要

引言

早期干预可能会显著改善成年期精神障碍的预后。

方法

本研究考察了一种独立的、强化的、基于家庭的心理化治疗(MBT)对处于精神病谱系的极高风险、不寻求帮助的青少年的可接受性和有效性[家庭干预临床团队(ECID)]。

结果

尽管此前无法参与治疗,但超过90%的青少年参与了治疗,且处于精神病谱系的青少年的参与度略高于一般高风险组(分别为95%和85%,χ² = 4.218,p = 0.049)。广义估计方程(GEE)模型显示,在控制入组时缺课时长的情况下,治疗的前12个月内,两组在重新上学可能性方面无主要组间效应(χ² = 1.015,p = 0.314)。总体而言,在此期间,上学参与率从12%上升至55%,超过40%的总样本经历了临床可靠的变化,另有50%表现为临床稳定。在治疗的第一年,两组在HoNOSCA总严重程度评分的平均变化(χ² = 0.249,p = 0.618)或青少年临床变化类别分布方面均未观察到统计学显著差异(χ² = 0.068,p = 0.795)。

讨论

本研究结果表明,基于心理化的干预可能能够让极高风险的青少年参与治疗,并在12个月后对症状严重程度和功能产生具有临床意义的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08bb/10352583/3bef336369db/fpsyt-14-1206511-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08bb/10352583/a3425a5988f4/fpsyt-14-1206511-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08bb/10352583/3bef336369db/fpsyt-14-1206511-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08bb/10352583/a3425a5988f4/fpsyt-14-1206511-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08bb/10352583/3bef336369db/fpsyt-14-1206511-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Mentalization based treatment of youth on the psychotic spectrum: clinical profiles and outcomes for youth in the ECID.基于心理化的青少年精神病性谱系障碍治疗:欧洲儿童与青少年精神疾病研究中青少年的临床概况及治疗结果
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 4;14:1206511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1206511. eCollection 2023.
2
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
3
Mentalization-based treatment in groups for adolescents with Borderline Personality Disorder: 3- and 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.基于心理化的团体治疗对边缘型人格障碍青少年的疗效:一项随机对照试验的 3 个月和 12 个月随访研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 May;30(5):699-710. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01551-2. Epub 2020 May 9.
4
Mentalization-based treatment in groups for adolescents with borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial.基于心智化的团体治疗用于边缘型人格障碍青少年:一项随机对照试验。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 May;61(5):594-604. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13152. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Mentalization-oriented psychodynamic group therapy for patients with personality disorders: a naturalistic prospective cohort study.面向心理化的精神动力团体治疗对人格障碍患者的效果:一项自然前瞻性队列研究。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;77(2):147-157. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2022.2067898. Epub 2022 May 5.
7
Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.针对边缘型人格障碍患者的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 4;5(5):CD012955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012955.pub2.
8
Trauma and Outcomes of Mentalization-Based Therapy for Individuals With Borderline Personality Disorder.边缘型人格障碍个体的心理化治疗的创伤和结果。
Am J Psychother. 2022 Jan 1;75(1):12-20. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20210027. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
9
[Mentalization based treatment and borderline personality disorder].[基于心理化的治疗与边缘型人格障碍]
Encephale. 2017 Aug;43(4):340-345. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.02.020. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
10
Day hospital mentalization-based treatment v. specialist treatment as usual in patients with borderline personality disorder: randomized controlled trial.日间医院基于心理化的治疗与边缘型人格障碍患者的常规专科治疗对照:随机对照试验。
Psychol Med. 2018 Nov;48(15):2522-2529. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718000132. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

本文引用的文献

1
The lived experience of psychosis: a bottom-up review co-written by experts by experience and academics.精神病的亲身经历:由有亲身经历的专家和学者共同撰写的自下而上的综述。
World Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;21(2):168-188. doi: 10.1002/wps.20959.
2
Early intervention service systems for youth mental health: integrating pluripotentiality, clinical staging, and transdiagnostic lessons from early psychosis.青少年心理健康早期干预服务系统:整合多潜能性、临床分期和早期精神病学的跨诊断经验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 May;9(5):413-422. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00467-3.
3
The mind-in-mind study: A pilot randomised controlled trial that compared modified mentalisation based treatment with supportive clinical management for patients with eating disorders without borderline personality disorder.
心对心研究:一项针对无边缘型人格障碍的进食障碍患者的试点随机对照试验,比较了改良的基于心理化的治疗与支持性临床管理。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2022 May;30(3):206-220. doi: 10.1002/erv.2888. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
4
Clinical outcomes in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis who do not transition to psychosis: a meta-analysis.未发展为精神病的临床精神病高危个体的临床结局:meta 分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2022 Jan 19;31:e9. doi: 10.1017/S2045796021000639.
5
Mentalization-Based Treatment in Groups for Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder.针对患有自闭症谱系障碍的成年人的团体心理化治疗
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 12;12:708557. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708557. eCollection 2021.
6
Probability of Transition to Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk: An Updated Meta-analysis.临床高风险个体向精神病转化的概率:一项更新的荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):970-978. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0830.
7
Longitudinal outcome of attenuated positive symptoms, negative symptoms, functioning and remission in people at clinical high risk for psychosis: a meta-analysis.精神病临床高危人群中阳性症状、阴性症状、功能及缓解的纵向转归:一项荟萃分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jun 16;36:100909. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100909. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies.全球精神障碍发病年龄:192 项流行病学研究的大规模荟萃分析。
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;27(1):281-295. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01161-7. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
9
Register-based metrics of years lived with disability associated with mental and substance use disorders: a register-based cohort study in Denmark.基于登记的精神和物质使用障碍相关残疾生存年数的衡量指标:丹麦基于登记的队列研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;8(4):310-319. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00029-8.
10
Improving lives not just saying no to substances: Evaluating outcomes for a young people's substance use team trained in the AMBIT approach.改善生活,不只是对物质说不:评估接受 AMBIT 方法培训的青少年物质使用小组的结果。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;26(2):490-504. doi: 10.1177/1359104521994875. Epub 2021 Feb 21.