• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇科教学助理的效用

Utility of Gynecological Teaching Associates.

作者信息

Kelly Katherine, Wilder Lauren, Bastin Jessica, Lane-Cordova Abbi, Cai Bo, Cook James

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health Richland Hospital, Columbia, USA.

Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jun 18;15(6):e40601. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40601. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.40601
PMID:37469809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10353857/
Abstract

Introduction Gynecological teaching associates (GTAs) are trained to teach the pelvic exam using themselves as models, and it has been hypothesized that their use can improve learners' confidence and interpersonal skills. This study aims to gain greater insight into whether the use of GTAs is associated with increased medical students' confidence when performing the pelvic exam during clinical rotations. Methods An email survey was distributed to medical students in two different classes at a single United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)-accredited medical school: one that learned the pelvic exam using GTAs and one that did not. A Fisher's exact test was performed to determine associations between the use of GTAs and confidence in performing the pelvic exam, with a p-value of <0.01. Results Out of the 85 survey participants, 68 had performed a pelvic exam in the clinical setting and thus rated their confidence level. Of the 38 students who learned using a GTA, 66% (p<0.0024) reported a confidence level of four or five (out of five) compared to 50% of the 30 students who were not able to practice using a GTA. There was a statistically significant difference in the confidence levels of students who practiced on GTAs compared to those who did not. Discussion Our findings demonstrated that students who were able to learn the pelvic exam using GTAs reported higher confidence levels when subsequently performing a pelvic exam in a clinical setting. Conclusion Our findings support investment in GTA programming for teaching the pelvic exam in medical school curricula.

摘要

引言 妇科教学助手(GTAs)接受过以自身为模型教授盆腔检查的培训,据推测,使用他们可以提高学习者的信心和人际交往能力。本研究旨在更深入了解在临床轮转期间进行盆腔检查时,使用GTAs是否与医学生信心的增强相关。方法 向一所单一的美国医学执照考试(USMLE)认可医学院的两个不同班级的医学生发送了电子邮件调查:一个班级使用GTAs学习盆腔检查,另一个班级则没有。进行了Fisher精确检验以确定使用GTAs与进行盆腔检查的信心之间的关联,p值<0.01。结果 在85名调查参与者中,68人在临床环境中进行过盆腔检查,因此对他们的信心水平进行了评分。在38名使用GTA学习的学生中,66%(p<0.0024)报告信心水平为四或五级(满分五级),而在30名未使用GTA练习的学生中这一比例为50%。与未使用GTA练习的学生相比,使用GTA练习的学生在信心水平上存在统计学上的显著差异。讨论 我们的研究结果表明,能够使用GTAs学习盆腔检查的学生在随后的临床环境中进行盆腔检查时报告的信心水平更高。结论 我们的研究结果支持在医学院课程中投资GTA项目来教授盆腔检查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5ec/10353857/99a92dca4fd2/cureus-0015-00000040601-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5ec/10353857/7f7b949fcd52/cureus-0015-00000040601-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5ec/10353857/99a92dca4fd2/cureus-0015-00000040601-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5ec/10353857/7f7b949fcd52/cureus-0015-00000040601-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5ec/10353857/99a92dca4fd2/cureus-0015-00000040601-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Utility of Gynecological Teaching Associates.妇科教学助理的效用
Cureus. 2023 Jun 18;15(6):e40601. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40601. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
The effectiveness of gynaecology teaching associates in teaching pelvic examination to medical students: a randomised controlled trial.妇科教学助理在医学生盆腔检查教学中的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Mar;210:58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
3
Cost-effective analysis of teaching pelvic examination skills using Gynaecology Teaching Associates (GTAs) compared with manikin models (The CEAT Study).使用妇科教学助手(GTAs)与人体模型对比进行盆腔检查技能教学的成本效益分析(CEAT研究)
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 22;8(6):e015823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015823.
4
Implementation and utilization of gynecological teaching associate and male urogenital teaching associate programs: a scoping review.妇科教学辅助和男性泌尿生殖系统教学辅助项目的实施与应用:一项范围综述
Adv Simul (Lond). 2021 May 20;6(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s41077-021-00172-2.
5
Pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in United States medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors.美国医学院校的盆腔和乳房检查技能课程:妇产科临床实习主任的一项调查
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Dec 16;16(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0835-6.
6
A cross-sectional study on teaching pelvic examination in medical schools in the UK (the COTES study).一项关于英国医学院校盆腔检查教学的横断面研究(COTES研究)。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 May;38(4):521-525. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1363726. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
7
The association of standardized patient educators (ASPE) gynecological teaching associate (GTA) and male urogenital teaching associate (MUTA) standards of best practice.标准化患者教育工作者协会(ASPE)妇科教学助理(GTA)和男性泌尿生殖系统教学助理(MUTA)的最佳实践标准。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2021 Jun 21;6(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s41077-021-00162-4.
8
The effectiveness of gynaecological teaching associates in teaching pelvic examination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.妇科教学助理在盆腔检查教学中的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Med Educ. 2015 Dec;49(12):1197-206. doi: 10.1111/medu.12816.
9
Improving Medical Student Comfort and Competence in Performing Gynecological Exams: A Systematic Review.提高医学生进行妇科检查的舒适度和能力:系统评价。
Acad Med. 2021 Sep 1;96(9):1353-1365. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004128.
10
Pelvic examination skills training with genital teaching associates and a pelvic simulator: does sequence matter?盆腔检查技能训练与生殖器教学助理和盆腔模拟器:顺序重要吗?
Simul Healthc. 2012 Apr;7(2):95-101. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31823b9e46.

引用本文的文献

1
Requirements and Value Elicitation for a High-Fidelity Pelvic Floor Simulator for Physiotherapists: Mixed Methods Study.面向物理治疗师的高保真盆底模拟器的要求与价值引出:混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 May 15;12:e72119. doi: 10.2196/72119.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical students' experiences in learning to perform pelvic examinations: a mixed-methods study.医学生学习进行骨盆检查的体验:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Med Educ. 2021 Nov 26;12:233-242. doi: 10.5116/ijme.617f.b261.
2
The "Carousel": a new simulation model for assessing the female pelvic examination in medical education.“旋转木马”:一种用于医学教育中评估女性盆腔检查的新型模拟模型。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Feb;156(2):376-378. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13953. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
3
Resident Competency in Pelvic Exam Skills Not Predicted by Early Assessment.
早期评估无法预测住院医师骨盆检查技能的胜任能力。
PRiMER. 2017 Sep 5;1:17. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2017.196036. eCollection 2017 Sep.
4
To the Point: The expanding role of simulation in obstetrics and gynecology medical student education.要点:模拟在妇产科医学生教育中不断扩大的作用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;220(2):129-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.029. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
5
Cost-effective analysis of teaching pelvic examination skills using Gynaecology Teaching Associates (GTAs) compared with manikin models (The CEAT Study).使用妇科教学助手(GTAs)与人体模型对比进行盆腔检查技能教学的成本效益分析(CEAT研究)
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 22;8(6):e015823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015823.
6
Pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in United States medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors.美国医学院校的盆腔和乳房检查技能课程:妇产科临床实习主任的一项调查
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Dec 16;16(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0835-6.
7
The effectiveness of gynaecology teaching associates in teaching pelvic examination to medical students: a randomised controlled trial.妇科教学助理在医学生盆腔检查教学中的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Mar;210:58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
8
The effectiveness of gynaecological teaching associates in teaching pelvic examination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.妇科教学助理在盆腔检查教学中的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Med Educ. 2015 Dec;49(12):1197-206. doi: 10.1111/medu.12816.
9
The challenging pelvic examination.有挑战性的盆腔检查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jun;26(6):651-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1610-8. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
10
Medical students learning the pelvic examination: comparison of outcome in terms of skills between a professional patient and a clinical patient model.学习盆腔检查的医学生:专业模拟病人与临床病人模型在技能方面的结果比较。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Nov;68(3):211-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.007. Epub 2007 Jun 18.