Suppr超能文献

家长报告的儿科基因组测序的临床实用性。

Parent-Reported Clinical Utility of Pediatric Genomic Sequencing.

机构信息

Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy.

Precision Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2023 Aug 1;152(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-060318.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Genomic sequencing (GS) is increasingly used for diagnostic evaluation, yet follow-up care is not well understood. We assessed clinicians' recommendations after GS, parent-reported follow-up, and actions parents initiated in response to learning their child's GS results.

METHODS

We surveyed parents of children who received GS through the Clinical Sequencing Evidence Generating Research consortium ∼5 to 7 months after return of results. We compared the proportion of parents who reported discussing their child's result with a clinician, clinicians' recommendations, and parents' follow-up actions by GS result type using χ2 tests.

RESULTS

A total of 1188 respondents completed survey measures on recommended medical actions (n = 1187) and/or parent-initiated actions (n = 913). Most parents who completed recommended medical actions questions (n = 833, 70.3%) reported having discussed their child's GS results with clinicians. Clinicians made recommendations to change current care for patients with positive GS results (n = 79, 39.1%) more frequently than for those with inconclusive (n = 31, 12.4%) or negative results (n = 44, 11.9%; P < .001). Many parents discussed (n = 152 completed, n = 135 planned) implications of GS results for future pregnancies with a clinician. Aside from clinical recommendations, 13.0% (n = 119) of parents initiated changes to their child's health or lifestyle.

CONCLUSIONS

In diverse pediatric clinical contexts, GS results can lead to recommendations for follow-up care, but they likely do not prompt large increases in the quantity of care received.

摘要

背景和目的

基因组测序(GS)越来越多地用于诊断评估,但后续护理的情况尚不清楚。我们评估了 GS 后临床医生的建议、家长报告的随访情况以及家长在得知孩子 GS 结果后采取的行动。

方法

我们对通过临床测序证据生成研究联盟在获得结果后约 5 至 7 个月接受 GS 的儿童的父母进行了调查。我们比较了不同 GS 结果类型的父母报告与临床医生讨论其孩子结果的比例、临床医生的建议以及父母的后续行动。使用 χ2 检验。

结果

共有 1188 名受访者完成了关于推荐医疗措施(n = 1187)和/或父母发起的措施(n = 913)的调查措施。大多数完成推荐医疗措施问题的父母(n = 833,70.3%)报告与临床医生讨论过他们孩子的 GS 结果。临床医生更频繁地为阳性 GS 结果患者(n = 79,39.1%)提出改变当前护理的建议,而不是为不确定结果(n = 31,12.4%)或阴性结果(n = 44,11.9%)患者提出建议(P <.001)。许多家长与临床医生讨论了 GS 结果对未来妊娠的影响(n = 152 完成,n = 135 计划)。除了临床建议外,13.0%(n = 119)的父母还对孩子的健康或生活方式进行了调整。

结论

在不同的儿科临床环境中,GS 结果可能导致后续护理建议,但它们不太可能导致接受的护理量大幅增加。

相似文献

1
Parent-Reported Clinical Utility of Pediatric Genomic Sequencing.
Pediatrics. 2023 Aug 1;152(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-060318.
5
Perceived Benefits, Risks, and Utility of Newborn Genomic Sequencing in the BabySeq Project.
Pediatrics. 2019 Jan;143(Suppl 1):S6-S13. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1099C.
8
The interaction between parental concern and socioeconomic status in pediatric hydrocephalus management.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2020 Oct 9;27(1):16-22. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.PEDS20191. Print 2021 Jan 1.
9
Change in the Parent-Clinician Relationship Throughout the First Year of Treatment in Pediatric Oncology.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2230503. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.30503.
10
Responsibility, culpability, and parental views on genomic testing for seriously ill children.
Genet Med. 2019 Dec;21(12):2791-2797. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0570-6. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
When families bridge the research-clinical divide: An exploration of values regarding cascade screening in genomic research.
Genet Med Open. 2025 Jun 24;3:103440. doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2025.103440. eCollection 2025.
3
Genetic Test Utilization and Cost among Families of Children Evaluated for Genetic Conditions: An Analysis of USA Commercial Claims Data.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):519-530. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00942-9. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
4
Multidimensional and Longitudinal Impact of a Genetic Diagnosis for Critically Ill Infants.
Pediatrics. 2024 Dec 1;154(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2024-068197.
5
Early Intervention services in the era of genomic medicine: setting a research agenda.
Pediatr Res. 2024 Oct 22. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03668-5.
6
Multidimensional and Longitudinal Impact of a Genetic Diagnosis for Critically Ill Infants.
medRxiv. 2024 Jul 1:2024.06.29.24309646. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.29.24309646.
7
NeoGx: Machine-Recommended Rapid Genome Sequencing for Neonates.
medRxiv. 2024 Jun 25:2024.06.24.24309403. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.24.24309403.
8
Measuring health-related quality of life in children with suspected genetic conditions: validation of the PedsQL proxy-report versions.
Qual Life Res. 2024 Jun;33(6):1541-1553. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03623-1. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Key drivers of family-level utility of pediatric genomic sequencing: a qualitative analysis to support preference research.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Apr;31(4):445-452. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01245-0. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
2
Measures of Utility Among Studies of Genomic Medicine for Critically Ill Infants: A Systematic Review.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2225980. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25980.
4
Examining access to care in clinical genomic research and medicine: Experiences from the CSER Consortium.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep 14;5(1):e193. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.855. eCollection 2021.
6
Lessons learned about harmonizing survey measures for the CSER consortium.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Apr 24;4(6):537-546. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.41.
7
The Therapeutic Odyssey: Positioning Genomic Sequencing in the Search for a Child's Best Possible Life.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jul-Sep;12(3):179-189. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2021.1907475. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
10
Using the Delphi method to identify clinicians' perceived importance of pediatric exome sequencing results.
Genet Med. 2020 Jan;22(1):69-76. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0601-3. Epub 2019 Jul 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验