Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy.
Precision Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pediatrics. 2023 Aug 1;152(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-060318.
Genomic sequencing (GS) is increasingly used for diagnostic evaluation, yet follow-up care is not well understood. We assessed clinicians' recommendations after GS, parent-reported follow-up, and actions parents initiated in response to learning their child's GS results.
We surveyed parents of children who received GS through the Clinical Sequencing Evidence Generating Research consortium ∼5 to 7 months after return of results. We compared the proportion of parents who reported discussing their child's result with a clinician, clinicians' recommendations, and parents' follow-up actions by GS result type using χ2 tests.
A total of 1188 respondents completed survey measures on recommended medical actions (n = 1187) and/or parent-initiated actions (n = 913). Most parents who completed recommended medical actions questions (n = 833, 70.3%) reported having discussed their child's GS results with clinicians. Clinicians made recommendations to change current care for patients with positive GS results (n = 79, 39.1%) more frequently than for those with inconclusive (n = 31, 12.4%) or negative results (n = 44, 11.9%; P < .001). Many parents discussed (n = 152 completed, n = 135 planned) implications of GS results for future pregnancies with a clinician. Aside from clinical recommendations, 13.0% (n = 119) of parents initiated changes to their child's health or lifestyle.
In diverse pediatric clinical contexts, GS results can lead to recommendations for follow-up care, but they likely do not prompt large increases in the quantity of care received.
基因组测序(GS)越来越多地用于诊断评估,但后续护理的情况尚不清楚。我们评估了 GS 后临床医生的建议、家长报告的随访情况以及家长在得知孩子 GS 结果后采取的行动。
我们对通过临床测序证据生成研究联盟在获得结果后约 5 至 7 个月接受 GS 的儿童的父母进行了调查。我们比较了不同 GS 结果类型的父母报告与临床医生讨论其孩子结果的比例、临床医生的建议以及父母的后续行动。使用 χ2 检验。
共有 1188 名受访者完成了关于推荐医疗措施(n = 1187)和/或父母发起的措施(n = 913)的调查措施。大多数完成推荐医疗措施问题的父母(n = 833,70.3%)报告与临床医生讨论过他们孩子的 GS 结果。临床医生更频繁地为阳性 GS 结果患者(n = 79,39.1%)提出改变当前护理的建议,而不是为不确定结果(n = 31,12.4%)或阴性结果(n = 44,11.9%)患者提出建议(P <.001)。许多家长与临床医生讨论了 GS 结果对未来妊娠的影响(n = 152 完成,n = 135 计划)。除了临床建议外,13.0%(n = 119)的父母还对孩子的健康或生活方式进行了调整。
在不同的儿科临床环境中,GS 结果可能导致后续护理建议,但它们不太可能导致接受的护理量大幅增加。