• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左侧乳腺癌患者深吸气屏气技术中心脏剂量 sparing 的预测因素。

Predictors of cardiac dose sparing in deep inspiratory breath-hold technique for radiation of left breast cancer patients.

作者信息

Nagpal Puneet, Pruthi Deep Shankar, Shanmugam Prabakar, Pandey Manish Bhushan, Singh Harpreet

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Action Cancer Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Ther. 2023 Apr-Jun;19(3):573-578. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_50_21.

DOI:10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_50_21
PMID:37470577
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Radiation therapy to left breast cancer patients results in significant exposure to heart resulting in long-term cardiac morbidity. This exposure can be reduced by performing deep inspiratory breath-hold (DIBH) technique, however, patient selection criteria or predictive parameters are not routinely used which can identify patients who will have significant benefit with this technique. This study intends to find and use these predictive parameters measured on free-breathing (FB) simulation scan which can help to select such patients so as to develop our institutional protocol.

METHODS

A total of 35 patients of left breast cancer postsurgery were recruited in the study. All patients underwent 2-3 sessions of DIBH coaching followed by planning computed tomography scan in both FB phase and DIBH phase. Various anatomical parameters such as cardiac contact distance parasagittal (CCDps), CCD axial, heart-chest distance (HCD), and D were measured on FB scan and were correlated with a mean heart dose achieved in DIBH scan.

RESULTS

Dose to normal structures, namely heart and lung, was drastically reduced for DIBH scan over FB scan. V5, V10, and V20 of heart also followed a similar reduction. The mean dose to heart in FB scan was 5.34 Gy, while in DIBH scan, it was 2.79 Gy which was statistically significant. Among all the parameters measured, CCDps and D had a statistically significant positive correlation with the mean heart dose in DIBH phase while HCD had a negative correlation which was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac parameters on FB scan such as CCDps, HCD, and D predict the patients with usual cardiac risk who will benefit most with DIBH techniques setting an arbitrarily cutoff value.

摘要

引言

对左乳癌患者进行放射治疗会使心脏受到大量辐射,从而导致长期心脏疾病。然而,通过采用深吸气屏气(DIBH)技术可以减少这种辐射,但目前尚未常规使用患者选择标准或预测参数来识别能从该技术中显著获益的患者。本研究旨在寻找并使用在自由呼吸(FB)模拟扫描中测量的这些预测参数,以帮助选择此类患者,从而制定我们机构的方案。

方法

本研究共招募了35例左乳癌术后患者。所有患者均接受2 - 3次DIBH指导,随后在FB期和DIBH期进行计划计算机断层扫描。在FB扫描中测量了各种解剖参数,如矢状旁心脏接触距离(CCDps)、CCD轴向、心脏 - 胸部距离(HCD)和D,并将其与DIBH扫描中获得的平均心脏剂量进行关联。

结果

与FB扫描相比,DIBH扫描时心脏和肺等正常结构的剂量大幅降低。心脏的V5、V10和V20也有类似程度的降低。FB扫描中心脏的平均剂量为5.34 Gy,而在DIBH扫描中为2.79 Gy,具有统计学意义。在所有测量参数中,CCDps和D与DIBH期的平均心脏剂量具有统计学意义的正相关,而HCD具有统计学意义的负相关。

结论

FB扫描中的心脏参数,如CCDps、HCD和D,可预测通常具有心脏风险的患者,这些患者将从DIBH技术中获益最大,并设定了一个任意的截止值。

相似文献

1
Predictors of cardiac dose sparing in deep inspiratory breath-hold technique for radiation of left breast cancer patients.左侧乳腺癌患者深吸气屏气技术中心脏剂量 sparing 的预测因素。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2023 Apr-Jun;19(3):573-578. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_50_21.
2
Predictors of cardiac and lung dose sparing in DIBH for left breast treatment.左侧乳腺癌保乳放疗中深吸气屏气(DIBH)的心脏和肺剂量节约的预测因素。
Phys Med. 2019 Nov;67:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.09.240. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
3
Deep inspiration breath-hold technique in left-sided breast cancer radiation therapy: Evaluating cardiac contact distance as a predictor of cardiac exposure for patient selection.左侧乳腺癌放射治疗中的深吸气屏气技术:评估心脏接触距离作为患者选择时心脏受照情况预测指标的研究
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015 May-Jun;5(3):e127-e134. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
4
Deep inspiration breath-hold radiation therapy in left-sided breast cancer patients: a single-institution retrospective dosimetric analysis of organs at risk doses.左侧乳腺癌患者深吸气屏气放射治疗:单机构回顾性分析危险器官剂量。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2023 Apr;199(4):379-388. doi: 10.1007/s00066-022-01998-z. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
5
Can we predict the cardiac benefit of deep inspiration breath hold for left breast and regional nodal irradiation?我们能否预测深吸气屏气对左侧乳腺及区域淋巴结放疗的心脏保护作用?
Cancer Radiother. 2023 Sep;27(5):407-412. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
6
Can physical parameters from radiation simulation scan with deep inspiratory breath hold predict magnitude of heart dose reduction?深吸气屏气状态下辐射模拟扫描的物理参数能否预测心脏剂量减少的程度?
J Cancer Res Ther. 2024 Jul 1;20(5):1539-1544. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2668_22. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
7
Deep inspiration breath-hold for left-sided breast irradiation: Analysis of dose-mass histograms and the impact of lung expansion.深吸气屏气左胸放疗:剂量-质量直方图分析及肺膨胀的影响。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jun 18;14(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1293-1.
8
Cardiac dose reduction using deep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH) in radiation treatment of left sided breast cancer patients with breast conservation surgery and modified radical mastectomy.使用深吸气屏气(DIBH)技术降低左侧乳腺癌保乳手术和改良根治性乳房切除术患者的心脏剂量。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2021 Mar;52(1):57-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.12.004. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
9
The benefit of deep inspiration breath hold: evaluating cardiac radiation exposure in patients after mastectomy and after breast-conserving surgery.深吸气屏气的益处:评估乳房切除术后及保乳手术后患者的心脏辐射暴露情况。
Breast Cancer. 2017 Jan;24(1):86-91. doi: 10.1007/s12282-016-0676-5. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
10
Dosimetric comparison of deep-inspiration breath-hold and free-breathing treatment delivery techniques for left-sided breast cancer using 3D surface tracking.使用三维表面追踪技术对左侧乳腺癌深吸气屏气与自由呼吸治疗技术进行剂量学比较。
Med Dosim. 2019;44(3):193-198. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
A Prospective Study on the Use of Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold Technique in External Beam Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer.一项关于深吸气屏气技术在乳腺癌外照射放疗中应用的前瞻性研究。
South Asian J Cancer. 2024 May 13;14(1):30-37. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1786880. eCollection 2025 Jan.