Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Turkey.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University, Turkey.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2023 Jun;26(6):694-700. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_803_22.
Vertigo and dizziness are common symptoms in patients presenting to emergency medicine (ED) clinics. Vertigo may be caused by peripheral or central origin. Routine imaging is not indicated; however, neuroimaging is increasing, and published studies have revealed a small number of positive findings on imaging modalities.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether neurological imaging was necessary in patients classified as "unidentified vertigo," who were admitted to the emergency department with vertiginous complaints and not revealing typical peripheral vertigo findings and any neurological deficits.
All patients with "dizzy symptoms" were included in the study. For patients who met the definition of "unidentified vertigo," experimental neurological imaging studies were done. Head computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gradient-echo sequences (GRE), and diffusion weighted images (DWI) were used for imaging. Patients who underwent neuroimaging in the ED were followed up for 6 months in Neurology and ENT clinics.
A total of 351 patients were included in the study. Experimental imaging was performed on 100 patients. CT detected a significant pathology associated with the vertigo complaint in only one patient. MRI results were similar to the CT results. MRI-GRE sequences showed some additional pathologies in 14 patients and 4 of them were thought to be related to vertiginous symptoms. None of the patients classified as "non-central causes of vertigo" in the neuroimaging group developed TIA or CVD during 6 months of follow-up.
Head CT can be adequate to exclude life-threatening central pathology in "undifferentiated vertigo patients" and the addition of MRI did not add any diagnostic accuracy in ED management. Using the physical examination findings effectively to make a specific diagnosis may reduce misdiagnosis and improve resource utilization.
眩晕和头晕是急诊医学(ED)诊所就诊患者的常见症状。眩晕可能由周围或中枢起源引起。常规影像学检查并非必需;然而,神经影像学检查正在增加,发表的研究显示影像学检查有少数阳性发现。
本研究旨在探讨在因眩晕就诊且无典型周围性眩晕发现和任何神经功能缺损的“不明原因眩晕”患者中,是否需要进行神经影像学检查。
所有“头晕症状”患者均纳入本研究。对于符合“不明原因眩晕”定义的患者,进行了实验性神经影像学检查。头部计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)梯度回波序列(GRE)和弥散加权成像(DWI)用于成像。在 ED 进行神经影像学检查的患者在神经内科和耳鼻喉科门诊进行了 6 个月的随访。
共有 351 例患者纳入本研究。对 100 例患者进行了实验性影像学检查。CT 仅在 1 例患者中发现与眩晕主诉相关的显著病理学改变。MRI 结果与 CT 结果相似。MRI-GRE 序列在 14 例患者中显示出一些额外的病理学改变,其中 4 例被认为与眩晕症状有关。在神经影像学组中被归类为“非中枢性眩晕病因”的患者在 6 个月的随访中均未发生 TIA 或 CVD。
在“未分化眩晕患者”中,头部 CT 足以排除危及生命的中枢性病变,而 MRI 的加入并未在 ED 管理中增加任何诊断准确性。有效地利用体检结果进行明确诊断,可能会减少误诊并提高资源利用率。