Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Services, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 Sep;37(6):809-822. doi: 10.1037/adb0000945. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
Cannabis use motives and craving are associated with increased risk for cannabis-related problems and are ideal targets for prevention and early intervention. Patterns of motives and craving reactivity to cannabis cues differ by sex; however, few studies closely examine the relationship between motives and craving and how it may differ by valence (±) across men and women.
The present study used Cue Reactivity Ecological Momentary Assessment to assess reward (+) and relief (-) craving four semirandom times per day for 2 weeks in a sample of 63 emerging adults (age 18-21; 54% cisgender women; 85.7% White) who frequently use cannabis (≥ 3 times per week). We assessed craving before and after exposure to brief neutral or cannabis image cues and examined within- and between-participant effects of cue type, motives, sex/gender, and their interactions, on postcue cannabis craving.
Regardless of cue type, women with high coping motives (-) reported less postcue relief (-) craving, and men with high enhancement motives (+) reported more postcue reward (+) craving. High enhancement motives (+), regardless of sex/gender, were associated with elevated relief (-) craving reactivity to cannabis cues, and women with high coping motives (-) reported elevated reward (+) craving reactivity to cannabis cues.
Sex/gender differences in the relationships between cannabis motives and craving reactivity indicate the value of a more targeted examination of valence (±) of craving experiences in addition to motives for use. Higher levels of precision may better inform interventions for emerging adults at risk for experiencing cannabis-related problems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
大麻使用动机和渴求与大麻相关问题的风险增加有关,是预防和早期干预的理想目标。动机和对大麻线索的渴求反应模式因性别而异;然而,很少有研究仔细检查动机和渴求之间的关系,以及它如何因性别而在正(+)负(-)效价上有所不同。
本研究使用线索反应生态瞬时评估(Cue Reactivity Ecological Momentary Assessment),在一个经常使用大麻(每周≥3 次)的 63 名成年早期(18-21 岁;54%顺性别女性;85.7%白人)样本中,每天进行 4 次半随机的奖励(+)和缓解(-)渴求评估,为期 2 周。我们在暴露于简短的中性或大麻图像线索前后评估了渴求,并检查了线索类型、动机、性别/性别和它们的相互作用对内和个体间的影响,对线索后大麻渴求的影响。
无论线索类型如何,高应对动机(-)的女性报告的缓解(-)渴求较少,高强化动机(+)的男性报告的奖励(+)渴求较多。无论性别如何,高强化动机(+)与大麻线索的缓解(-)渴求反应性升高有关,高应对动机(-)的女性报告大麻线索的奖励(+)渴求反应性升高。
大麻动机和渴求反应性之间的关系存在性别差异,表明除了使用动机外,还需要更有针对性地检查渴求体验的效价(±)。更高的精度水平可能会更好地为有大麻相关问题风险的成年早期个体提供干预措施。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。