Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Fuwai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, John Radcliffe Hospital, National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Apr;17(4):364-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.05.019. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) is a novel technique for assessing myocardial deformation and dysfunction. However, a comprehensive assessment of normal values of strain parameters in all 4 cardiac chambers using different vendors is lacking.
This study aimed to characterize the normal values for myocardial strain in all 4 cardiac chambers and identify factors that contribute to variations in FT strain through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the CMR-FT published reports.
The investigators searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for myocardial strains of all 4 chambers measured by CMR-FT in healthy adults. The pooled means of all strain parameters were generated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were performed to identify the sources of variations.
This meta-analysis included 44 studies with a total of 3,359 healthy subjects. The pooled means of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS), LV global radial strain, and LV global circumferential strain (GCS) were -18.4% (95% CI: -19.2% to -17.6%), 43.7% (95% CI: 40.0%-47.4%), and -21.4% (95% CI: -22.3% to -20.6%), respectively. The pooled means of left atrial (LA)-GLS (corresponding to total strain, passive strain, and active strain) were 34.9% (95% CI: 29.6%-40.2%), 21.3% (95% CI: 16.6%-26.1%) and 14.3% (95% CI: 11.8%-16.8%), respectively. The pooled means of right ventricular (RV)-GLS and right atrial global longitudinal total strain were -24.0% (95% CI: -25.8% to -22.1%) and 36.3% (95% CI: 15.5%-57.0%), respectively. Meta-regression identified field strength (P < 0.001; I = 98.6%) and FT vendor (P < 0.001; I = 98.5%) as significant confounders contributing to heterogeneity of LV-GLS. The variations of LA-GLS were associated with regional distribution (P < 0.001; I = 97.3%) and FT vendor (P < 0.001; I = 97.4%). Differences in FT vendor were attributed to variations of LV-GCS and RV-GLS (P = 0.02; I = 98.8% and P = 0.01; I = 93.8%).
This study demonstrated the normal values of CMR-FT strain parameters in all 4 cardiac chambers in healthy subjects. Differences in FT vendor contributed to the heterogeneity of LV-GLS, LV-GCS, LA-GLS, and RV-GLS, whereas sex, age, and MR vendor had no effect on the normal values of CMR-FT strain measurements.
心脏磁共振特征追踪(CMR-FT)是一种评估心肌变形和功能障碍的新技术。然而,缺乏使用不同供应商对所有 4 个心腔的应变参数的正常值进行全面评估的研究。
本研究旨在通过对 CMR-FT 发表报告进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,描述所有 4 个心腔心肌应变的正常值,并确定导致 FT 应变差异的因素。
研究人员在 PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus 中搜索了使用 CMR-FT 测量的健康成年人的所有 4 个心腔心肌应变的研究。使用随机效应模型生成所有应变参数的汇总均值。进行亚组分析和荟萃回归以确定变异的来源。
这项荟萃分析纳入了 44 项研究,共纳入了 3359 名健康受试者。左心室整体纵向应变(LV-GLS)、左心室整体径向应变和左心室整体周向应变的汇总均值分别为-18.4%(95%置信区间:-19.2%至-17.6%)、43.7%(95%置信区间:40.0%-47.4%)和-21.4%(95%置信区间:-22.3%至-20.6%)。左心房(LA)-GLS(对应总应变、被动应变和主动应变)的汇总均值分别为 34.9%(95%置信区间:29.6%-40.2%)、21.3%(95%置信区间:16.6%-26.1%)和 14.3%(95%置信区间:11.8%-16.8%)。右心室(RV)-GLS 和右心房整体纵向总应变的汇总均值分别为-24.0%(95%置信区间:-25.8%至-22.1%)和 36.3%(95%置信区间:15.5%-57.0%)。荟萃回归确定场强(P<0.001;I=98.6%)和 FT 供应商(P<0.001;I=98.5%)是导致 LV-GLS 异质性的重要混杂因素。LA-GLS 的变化与区域分布(P<0.001;I=97.3%)和 FT 供应商(P<0.001;I=97.4%)有关。FT 供应商的差异归因于 LV-GCS 和 RV-GLS 的变化(P=0.02;I=98.8%和 P=0.01;I=93.8%)。
本研究在健康受试者中展示了所有 4 个心腔 CMR-FT 应变参数的正常值。FT 供应商的差异导致了 LV-GLS、LV-GCS、LA-GLS 和 RV-GLS 的异质性,而性别、年龄和 MR 供应商对 CMR-FT 应变测量的正常值没有影响。