Department of Nephrology, Hypertension, Dialysis and Transplantation, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Clinic of anesthesiology resuscitation and intensive care, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Blood Purif. 2023;52(7-8):642-651. doi: 10.1159/000531356. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
This study investigates the impact of sequential extracorporeal treatments with oXiris® or CytoSorb® plus Seraph-100® on the clinical and laboratory parameters of critically ill COVID-19 patients with bacterial superinfection.
Patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19, bacterial superinfection, and undergoing blood purification (BP) were enrolled in this prospective, single-center, observational study. "standard BP" with oXiris® or CytoSorb® were used in 35 COVID-19 patients with bacterial infection. Seraph-100® was added in 33 patients when available serially in the same oXiris® circuit or as sequential treatment with CytoSorb® as a sequential BP.
A significant reduction in SOFA score 3 days after treatment was observed in patients undergoing sequential BP (11.3 vs. 8.17, p < 0.01) compared to those undergoing "standard BP" (11.0 vs. 10.3, p > 0.05). The difference between the observed and expected mortality rate based on APACHE IV was greater in the sequential BP group (42.4% vs. 81.7%, p < 0.001) than the "standard BP" (74.2% vs. 81.7%, p > 0.05). Patients treated with sequential BP had a longer survival than those treated with "standard BP" (22.4 vs. 18.7 months; p < 0.001).
The sequential approach may enhance the positive effect of BP on organ dysfunction among critically ill patients with COVID-19 and bacterial superinfection.
本研究旨在探讨序贯使用 oXiris®或 CytoSorb®联合 Seraph-100®体外治疗对合并细菌感染的危重症 COVID-19 患者的临床和实验室参数的影响。
本前瞻性、单中心、观察性研究纳入了因 COVID-19、细菌感染且需行血液净化(BP)而入住重症监护病房的患者。35 例细菌感染的 COVID-19 患者接受 oXiris®或 CytoSorb®的“标准 BP”治疗。当可序贯使用时,33 例患者在同一 oXiris®回路中添加 Seraph-100®,或在 CytoSorb®后序贯添加 Seraph-100®作为序贯 BP。
与接受“标准 BP”治疗的患者(11.0 vs. 10.3,p > 0.05)相比,接受序贯 BP 治疗的患者在治疗后 3 天 SOFA 评分显著降低(11.3 vs. 8.17,p < 0.01)。基于 APACHE IV 观察到的与预期死亡率之间的差异在序贯 BP 组更大(42.4% vs. 81.7%,p < 0.001),而在“标准 BP”组则更小(74.2% vs. 81.7%,p > 0.05)。接受序贯 BP 治疗的患者比接受“标准 BP”治疗的患者存活时间更长(22.4 与 18.7 个月;p < 0.001)。
序贯方法可能增强 BP 对合并细菌感染的危重症 COVID-19 患者器官功能障碍的积极作用。