Dannhoff Guillaume, Gallinaro Paolo, Todeschi Julien, Ganau Mario, Spatola Giorgio, Ollivier Irène, Cebula Hélène, Mallereau Charles-Henry, Baloglu Seyyid, Pop Raoul, Proust Francois, Chibbaro Salvatore
Department of Neurosurgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France; Neuroradiology Unit, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France; Skull Base ENT-Neurosurgery Laboratory, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Department of Neurosurgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
World Neurosurg. 2023 Oct;178:e410-e420. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.080. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
Lesions of the foramen magnum (FM) and craniocervical junction area are traditionally managed surgically through anterior, anterolateral, and posterolateral skull-base approaches. This anatomical study aimed to compare the usefulness of a modified extended endoscopic approach, the so-called far-medial endonasal approach (FMEA), versus the traditional posterolateral far-lateral approach (FLA).
Ten fixed silicon-injected heads specimens were used in the Skull Base ENT-Neurosurgery Laboratory of the University Hospital of Strasbourg, France. A total of 20 FLAs and 10 FMEAs were realized. A high-resolution computed tomography scan was performed for quantitative analysis of the different approaches. The analysis aimed to estimate the extent of surgical exposure and freedom of movement (maneuverability) through the operating channel using a polygonal surface model to obtain a morphometric estimation of the area of interest (surface and volume) on postdissection computed tomography scans using Slicer 3D software.
FMEA allows for a more direct route to the anterior FM, with wider brainstem exposure compared with the FLA and an excellent visualization of all anterior midline structures. The limitations of the FMEA include the deep and narrow surgical corridor and difficulty in reaching lesions located laterally over the jugular foramen and hypoglossal canal.
The FMEA and FLA are both effective surgical routes to reach FM and craniocervical junction lesions. Modern skull base surgeons should have a good command of both because they appear complementary. This anatomical study provides the tools for comprehensive preoperative evaluations and selection of the most appropriate surgical approach.
传统上,枕骨大孔(FM)和颅颈交界区病变通过前入路、前外侧入路和后外侧颅底入路进行手术治疗。本解剖学研究旨在比较改良的扩大内镜入路,即所谓的远内侧经鼻入路(FMEA)与传统的后外侧远外侧入路(FLA)的实用性。
在法国斯特拉斯堡大学医院的颅底耳鼻喉-神经外科实验室使用10个注入硅胶的固定头部标本。共进行了20次FLA和10次FMEA。进行高分辨率计算机断层扫描以对不同入路进行定量分析。该分析旨在通过使用多边形表面模型估计手术暴露范围和通过手术通道的活动自由度(可操作性),以使用Slicer 3D软件在解剖后的计算机断层扫描上获得感兴趣区域(表面和体积)的形态计量估计。
与FLA相比,FMEA允许更直接地到达FM前部,脑干暴露更宽,并且所有前中线结构的可视化效果极佳。FMEA的局限性包括手术通道深且窄,难以到达位于颈静脉孔和舌下神经管外侧的病变。
FMEA和FLA都是到达FM和颅颈交界区病变的有效手术途径。现代颅底外科医生应该熟练掌握这两种方法,因为它们似乎具有互补性。本解剖学研究为全面的术前评估和选择最合适的手术入路提供了工具。