Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Centre for Human Resources and Education, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Nov;66(5):730-737. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.07.019. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
A "PROficiency based StePwise Endovascular Curricular Training" (PROSPECT) has proven its superiority over traditional training in a randomised controlled trial to acquire basic endovascular skills outside theatre, but real life adherence is low. This study aimed to compare the original distributed training format, where trainees learn at their own pace, with a massed training format offering the same content within a limited time span while exempt from clinical duties. Secondly, long term skills retention was evaluated.
A multicentre, prospective study allocated participants to the distributed D-PROSPECT or to a massed, compact version (C-PROSPECT) based on logistics such as travel time, participant and instructor availability. A multiple choice question (MCQ) test (max. score 20) tested cognitive skills. Technical skills were assessed using a global rating scale (GRS) (max. score 55), examiner's checklist (max. score 85), and validated simulator metrics. Data were collected pre- and post-programme and at three, six, and 12 months after programme completion.
Over four years and in two countries, D-PROSPECT was implemented in two centres and C-PROSPECT in three. A total of 22 participants completed D-PROSPECT with a 41% dropout rate, and 21 completed C-PROSPECT with 0% dropout rate. All participants showed significant improvement for all performance parameters after programme completion: MCQ test (median 14.5 vs. 18; p < .001), GRS (median 20 vs. 41; p < .001), examiner's checklist (median 49 vs. 78.5; p < .001), and simulation metrics (p < .001). Scores of C- or D-PROSPECT participants were not significantly different. No significant differences were seen between groups during the retention period.
PROSPECT significantly improves the quality of simulated endovascular performances using a massed or distributed training format. A massed training format of PROSPECT may be preferred to decrease dropout during standardised training to obtain basic endovascular skills in existing surgical curricula.
一项“基于熟练度的分步血管腔内课程培训”(PROSPECT)在一项随机对照试验中已被证明优于传统培训,可在手术室外获得基本的血管内技能,但实际的依从性较低。本研究旨在比较原始的分布式培训模式,即学员根据自己的进度学习,与集中式培训模式,该模式在有限的时间内提供相同的内容,同时免除临床任务。其次,评估长期技能保留情况。
一项多中心前瞻性研究根据旅行时间、学员和讲师的可用性等因素,将参与者分配到分布式 D-PROSPECT 或集中式、紧凑版本(C-PROSPECT)。多项选择题(MCQ)测试(最高 20 分)测试认知技能。使用综合评分量表(GRS)(最高 55 分)、考官检查表(最高 85 分)和经过验证的模拟器指标评估技术技能。数据在项目前后以及项目完成后 3、6 和 12 个月收集。
在四年内,在两个国家进行了两项研究,在两个中心实施了 D-PROSPECT,在三个中心实施了 C-PROSPECT。共有 22 名参与者完成了 D-PROSPECT,其中 41%的参与者中途退出,21 名参与者完成了 C-PROSPECT,无参与者中途退出。所有参与者在项目完成后所有表现参数均显著提高:MCQ 测试(中位数 14.5 对 18;p <.001)、GRS(中位数 20 对 41;p <.001)、考官检查表(中位数 49 对 78.5;p <.001)和模拟指标(p <.001)。C 或 D-PROSPECT 参与者的分数没有显著差异。在保留期间,组间无显著差异。
PROSPECT 显著提高了使用集中式或分布式培训模式进行模拟血管内手术表现的质量。在现有的外科课程中,为获得基本的血管内技能,PROSPECT 的集中式培训模式可能优于标准培训,以减少培训过程中的辍学率。