Suppr超能文献

脉搏波传导时间与动脉压力波测量的每搏量变异的比较评估。

Comparative evaluation of stroke volume variation measured by pulse wave transit time and arterial pressure wave.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, Oota, Japan.

Department of Anesthesiology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Mishima General Hospital, Fujikubo, Mishima, Japan.

出版信息

Technol Health Care. 2024;32(2):651-662. doi: 10.3233/THC-220849.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several monitors have been developed that measure stroke volume (SV) in a beat-to-beat manner. Accordingly, Stroke volume variation (SVV) induced by positive pressure ventilation is widely used to predict fluid responsiveness.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of two different methods to predict fluid responsiveness using SVV, stroke volume variation by esCCO (esSVV) and stroke volume variation by FloTrac/VigileoTM (flSVV).

METHODS

esSVV, flSVV, and stroke volume index (SVI) by both monitoring devices of 37 adult patients who underwent laparotomy surgery, were measured. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of esSVV was significantly higher than that of flSVV (p= 0.030). esSVV and flSVV showed cutoff values of 6.1% and 10% respectively, to predict an increase of more than 10% in SVI after fluid challenge. The Youden index for esSVV was higher than flSVV, even with a cutoff value between 6% and 8%.

CONCLUSION

Since esSVV and flSVV showed significant differences in AUC and cutoff values, the two systems were not comparable in predicting fluid responsiveness. Furthermore, it seems that SVV needs to be personalized to accurately predict fluid responsiveness for each patient.

摘要

背景

已经开发出了几种能够逐搏测量心输出量(SV)的监测仪。因此,正压通气引起的每搏量变异(SVV)被广泛用于预测液体反应性。

目的

本研究旨在比较两种不同方法使用 SVV(经 ECCo 测量的每搏量变异度 esSVV 和经 FloTrac/VigileoTM 测量的每搏量变异度 flSVV)预测液体反应性的能力。

方法

测量了 37 例接受剖腹手术的成年患者的两种监测仪的 esSVV、flSVV 和每搏量指数(SVI)。进行了接收器工作特征(ROC)分析。

结果

esSVV 的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)显著高于 flSVV(p=0.030)。esSVV 和 flSVV 预测液体冲击后 SVI 增加超过 10%的截断值分别为 6.1%和 10%。即使在 6%至 8%的截断值之间,esSVV 的 Youden 指数也高于 flSVV。

结论

由于 esSVV 和 flSVV 在 AUC 和截断值方面存在显著差异,因此这两种系统在预测液体反应性方面不能相互比较。此外,似乎需要对 SVV 进行个体化处理,以准确预测每个患者的液体反应性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8350/10977375/45feec22b79d/thc-32-thc220849-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验