Suppr超能文献

液体反应性的预测。有什么新进展?

Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What's new?

作者信息

Monnet Xavier, Shi Rui, Teboul Jean-Louis

机构信息

AP-HP, Service de médecine intensive-réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 4 CORREVE, Inserm UMR S_999, FHU SEPSIS, CARMAS, Université Paris-Saclay, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.

出版信息

Ann Intensive Care. 2022 May 28;12(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01022-8.

Abstract

Although the administration of fluid is the first treatment considered in almost all cases of circulatory failure, this therapeutic option poses two essential problems: the increase in cardiac output induced by a bolus of fluid is inconstant, and the deleterious effects of fluid overload are now clearly demonstrated. This is why many tests and indices have been developed to detect preload dependence and predict fluid responsiveness. In this review, we take stock of the data published in the field over the past three years. Regarding the passive leg raising test, we detail the different stroke volume surrogates that have recently been described to measure its effects using minimally invasive and easily accessible methods. We review the limits of the test, especially in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Regarding the end-expiratory occlusion test, we also present recent investigations that have sought to measure its effects without an invasive measurement of cardiac output. Although the limits of interpretation of the respiratory variation of pulse pressure and of the diameter of the vena cava during mechanical ventilation are now well known, several recent studies have shown how changes in pulse pressure variation itself during other tests reflect simultaneous changes in cardiac output, allowing these tests to be carried out without its direct measurement. This is particularly the case during the tidal volume challenge, a relatively recent test whose reliability is increasingly well established. The mini-fluid challenge has the advantage of being easy to perform, but it requires direct measurement of cardiac output, like the classic fluid challenge. Initially described with echocardiography, recent studies have investigated other means of judging its effects. We highlight the problem of their precision, which is necessary to evidence small changes in cardiac output. Finally, we point out other tests that have appeared more recently, such as the Trendelenburg manoeuvre, a potentially interesting alternative for patients in the prone position.

摘要

尽管在几乎所有循环衰竭病例中,补液都是首先考虑的治疗方法,但这种治疗选择存在两个基本问题:静脉推注液体引起的心输出量增加并不恒定,而且液体超负荷的有害影响现已得到明确证实。这就是为什么已经开发了许多测试和指标来检测前负荷依赖性并预测液体反应性。在这篇综述中,我们总结了过去三年该领域发表的数据。关于被动抬腿试验,我们详细介绍了最近描述的不同的每搏输出量替代指标,这些指标使用微创且易于获取的方法来测量其效果。我们回顾了该测试的局限性,特别是在腹腔内高压患者中。关于呼气末阻断试验,我们还介绍了最近的研究,这些研究试图在不进行心输出量有创测量的情况下测量其效果。尽管机械通气期间脉压和腔静脉直径的呼吸变化的解释局限性现已广为人知,但最近的几项研究表明,在其他测试期间脉压变化本身的变化如何反映心输出量的同时变化,从而无需直接测量心输出量即可进行这些测试。潮气量挑战试验尤其如此,这是一项相对较新的测试,其可靠性越来越得到认可。迷你液体挑战试验的优点是易于实施,但与经典液体挑战试验一样,它需要直接测量心输出量。最初是通过超声心动图描述的,最近的研究探讨了判断其效果的其他方法。我们强调了其精确性问题,这对于证明心输出量的微小变化是必要的。最后,我们指出了其他最近出现的测试,如特伦德伦伯卧位试验,这对于俯卧位患者可能是一个有趣的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65d/9148319/afd9e88ebdbe/13613_2022_1022_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验