Lymbery Alan J, Smit Nico J
Centre for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, 6150, Western Australia, Australia.
Water Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa.
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2023 Jul 3;21:255-263. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2023.07.001. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Although parasites make up a substantial proportion of the biotic component of ecosystems, in terms of both biomass and number of species, they are rarely considered in conservation planning, except where they are thought to pose a threat to the conservation of their hosts. In this review, we address a number of unresolved questions concerning parasite conservation. Arguments for conserving parasite species refer to the intrinsic value conferred by their evolutionary heritage and potential, their functional role in the provision of ecosystem services, and their value as indicators of ecosystem quality. We propose that proper consideration of these arguments mean that it is not logically defensible to automatically exclude parasite species from conservation decisions; rather, endangered hosts and parasites should be considered together as a threatened ecological community. The extent to which parasites are threatened with extinction is difficult to estimate with any degree of confidence, because so many parasite species have yet to be identified and, even for those which have been formally described, we have limited information on the factors affecting their distribution and abundance. This lack of ecological information may partially explain the under-representation of parasites on threatened species lists. Effective conservation of parasites requires maintaining access to suitable hosts and the ecological conditions that permit successful transmission between hosts. When implementing recovery plans for threatened host species, this may be best achieved by attempting to restore the ecological conditions that maintain the host and its parasite fauna in dynamic equilibrium. Ecosystem-centred conservation may be a more effective strategy than species-centred (or host-parasite community-centred) approaches for preventing extinction of parasites, but the criteria which are typically used to identify protected areas do not provide information on the ecological conditions required for effective transmission. We propose a simple decision tree to aid the identification of appropriate conservation actions for threatened parasites.
尽管寄生虫在生态系统生物成分中占相当大的比例,无论是在生物量还是物种数量方面,但在保护规划中它们很少被考虑,除非它们被认为对其宿主的保护构成威胁。在本综述中,我们探讨了一些关于寄生虫保护的未解决问题。保护寄生虫物种的论据包括其进化遗产和潜力赋予的内在价值、它们在提供生态系统服务方面的功能作用以及它们作为生态系统质量指标的价值。我们认为,对这些论据的适当考虑意味着在保护决策中自动排除寄生虫物种在逻辑上是站不住脚的;相反,濒危宿主和寄生虫应作为一个受威胁的生态群落一起考虑。由于如此多的寄生虫物种尚未被鉴定出来,而且即使对于那些已被正式描述的物种,我们对影响其分布和丰度的因素了解有限,因此很难有把握地估计寄生虫面临灭绝的程度。这种生态信息的缺乏可能部分解释了寄生虫在濒危物种名单中的代表性不足。有效的寄生虫保护需要保持接触合适的宿主以及允许在宿主之间成功传播的生态条件。在实施濒危宿主物种的恢复计划时,最好通过尝试恢复维持宿主及其寄生虫群落动态平衡的生态条件来实现这一点。以生态系统为中心的保护可能是比以物种为中心(或以宿主 - 寄生虫群落为中心)的方法更有效的防止寄生虫灭绝的策略,但通常用于确定保护区的标准并未提供有效传播所需生态条件的信息。我们提出一个简单的决策树,以帮助确定针对受威胁寄生虫的适当保护行动。