School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Centre for Environmental Sciences, Research Group Zoology: Biodiversity & Toxicology, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
J Anim Ecol. 2023 Feb;92(2):250-262. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13794. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
Many disease ecologists and conservation biologists believe that the world is wormier than it used to be-that is, that parasites are increasing in abundance through time. This argument is intuitively appealing. Ecologists typically see parasitic infections, through their association with disease, as a negative endpoint, and are accustomed to attributing negative outcomes to human interference in the environment, so it slots neatly into our worldview that habitat destruction, biodiversity loss and climate change should have the collateral consequence of causing outbreaks of parasites. But surprisingly, the hypothesis that parasites are increasing in abundance through time remains entirely untested for the vast majority of wildlife parasite species. Historical data on parasites are nearly impossible to find, which leaves no baseline against which to compare contemporary parasite burdens. If we want to know whether the world is wormier than it used to be, there is only one major research avenue that will lead to an answer: parasitological examination of specimens preserved in natural history collections. Recent advances demonstrate that, for many specimen types, it is possible to extract reliable data on parasite presence and abundance. There are millions of suitable specimens that exist in collections around the world. When paired with contemporaneous environmental data, these parasitological data could even point to potential drivers of change in parasite abundance, including climate, pollution or host density change. We explain how to use preserved specimens to address pressing questions in parasite ecology, give a few key examples of how collections-based parasite ecology can resolve these questions, identify some pitfalls and workarounds, and suggest promising areas for research. Natural history specimens are 'parasite time capsules' that give ecologists the opportunity to test whether infectious disease is on the rise and to identify what forces might be driving these changes over time. This approach will facilitate major advances in a new sub-discipline: the historical ecology of parasitism.
许多疾病生态学家和保护生物学家认为,现在的世界比过去更“多虫”,也就是说寄生虫的丰度随着时间的推移而增加。这个论点直观上很有吸引力。生态学家通常将寄生虫感染视为疾病的一个负面终点,并习惯于将负面结果归因于人类对环境的干扰,因此,栖息地破坏、生物多样性丧失和气候变化应该导致寄生虫爆发的这种附带后果与我们的世界观非常吻合。但令人惊讶的是,寄生虫的丰度随着时间的推移而增加的假设,对于绝大多数野生动物寄生虫物种来说,仍然完全没有经过检验。关于寄生虫的历史数据几乎不可能找到,因此没有基线可以与之进行比较。如果我们想知道现在的世界是否比过去多虫,只有一条主要的研究途径会得出答案:对自然历史收藏中保存的标本进行寄生虫学检查。最近的进展表明,对于许多标本类型,可以提取出关于寄生虫存在和丰度的可靠数据。在世界各地的收藏中,存在着数以百万计的合适标本。当与同时代的环境数据结合使用时,这些寄生虫学数据甚至可以指出寄生虫丰度变化的潜在驱动因素,包括气候、污染或宿主密度变化。我们解释了如何利用保存的标本来解决寄生虫生态学中的紧迫问题,给出了一些基于馆藏的寄生虫生态学如何解决这些问题的关键例子,确定了一些陷阱和解决方法,并提出了有前途的研究领域。自然历史标本是“寄生虫时间胶囊”,使生态学家有机会检验传染病是否在上升,并确定是什么力量随着时间的推移推动了这些变化。这种方法将促进寄生虫历史生态学这一新子学科的重大进展。