• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0确定基准残疾的临界值:一项来自印度南部农村的社区横断面研究。

Cutoff for Benchmark Disability Using World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study from Rural South India.

作者信息

Ravindran Swati, Jadhav Prabhu, Philip Sharad, Basavarajappa Chethan, Kumar Channaveerachari Naveen, Thirthalli Jagadisha, Sivakumar Thanapal

机构信息

Dept. of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

*Swati Ravindran and Prabhu Jadhav are joint first authors.

出版信息

Indian J Psychol Med. 2023 Jul;45(4):397-404. doi: 10.1177/02537176221124177. Epub 2022 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1177/02537176221124177
PMID:37483576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10357917/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

India uses the Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale (IDEAS) for quantifying disability due to mental illness. The cutoff score for benchmark disability is 7. India has adopted International Classification of Functioning and Health (ICF) and thereby is a signatory to use World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS). Cutoff for benchmark disability in WHODAS in a community-based sample is lacking.

METHODS

The study was conducted in Jagaluru Taluk, Davanagere District, Karnataka. It is a part of an ongoing research funded by Indian Council of Medical Research. Frequency, percentages, mean, standard deviations, mode, median, Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve were used in analyzing the data.

RESULTS

The study included 184 persons with severe mental illness with mean age of 47 and average duration of illness (DOI) of 11 years. They had mild disability (5.99) in IDEAS. The corresponding cutoff score in WHODAS, as compared to IDEAS, when the influence of DOI is removed was 24.

CONCLUSIONS

A shift from IDEAS to WHODAS is feasible. With the undue influence of DOI removed, both hospital and community-based samples show the score of 24 as cutoff.

摘要

背景

印度使用印度残疾评估量表(IDEAS)对精神疾病导致的残疾进行量化。基准残疾的临界分数为7分。印度已采用《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF),因此是使用世界卫生组织残疾评估量表(WHODAS)的签署国。目前尚缺乏基于社区样本的WHODAS基准残疾临界值。

方法

该研究在卡纳塔克邦达瓦纳吉雷区贾加卢鲁乡进行。它是印度医学研究理事会资助的一项正在进行的研究的一部分。在分析数据时使用了频率、百分比、均值、标准差、众数、中位数、受试者工作特征曲线。

结果

该研究纳入了184名重度精神疾病患者,平均年龄47岁,平均病程(DOI)为11年。他们在IDEAS量表中的残疾程度为轻度(5.99)。去除DOI的影响后,与IDEAS相比,WHODAS中的相应临界分数为24分。

结论

从IDEAS量表转换为WHODAS量表是可行的。去除DOI的不当影响后,医院和社区样本的临界分数均为24分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdd3/10357917/042fdd45d713/10.1177_02537176221124177-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdd3/10357917/692e80b7a594/10.1177_02537176221124177-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdd3/10357917/042fdd45d713/10.1177_02537176221124177-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdd3/10357917/692e80b7a594/10.1177_02537176221124177-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdd3/10357917/042fdd45d713/10.1177_02537176221124177-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Cutoff for Benchmark Disability Using World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study from Rural South India.使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0确定基准残疾的临界值:一项来自印度南部农村的社区横断面研究。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2023 Jul;45(4):397-404. doi: 10.1177/02537176221124177. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
2
Comparison of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation with the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II in persons with spinal cord injury.与 ICF 参与和活动筛查量表以及 WHO 残疾评估量表 II 相比,评估康复参与的乌得勒支量表在脊髓损伤患者中的应用比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.236. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
3
Community-Based Rehabilitation for Persons with Severe Mental Illness in a Rural Community of Karnataka: Methodology of a Randomized Controlled Study.卡纳塔克邦一个农村社区中重度精神疾病患者的社区康复:一项随机对照研究的方法
Indian J Psychol Med. 2020 Dec;42(6 Suppl):S73-S79. doi: 10.1177/0253717620971203. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) to estimate disability after stroke.世界卫生组织残疾评估表(WHODAS 2.0)评估脑卒中后残疾的诊断准确性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Jun;45(13):2169-2174. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2080876. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
5
The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) and the WHO Minimal Generic Set of Domains of Functioning and Health versus Conventional Instruments in subacute stroke.世界卫生组织残疾评估表(WHODAS 2.0)与 WHO 功能和健康通用基本领域集在亚急性脑卒中与常规仪器的对比。
J Rehabil Med. 2019 Oct 4;51(9):675-682. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2583.
6
The measurement of functioning using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: comparing qualifier ratings with existing health status instruments.使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类测量功能:qualifier 评级与现有健康状况量表的比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):541-548. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1381186. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
7
Determinants of Employment Outcome for the People with Schizophrenia Using the WHODAS 2.0.使用 WHODAS 2.0 评估精神分裂症患者的就业结果决定因素。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Jun;29(2):375-383. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9794-6.
8
Accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) score as an objective assessment tool for predicting return-to-work status after head and neck cancer in male survivors.世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0(WHODAS 2.0)评分作为客观评估工具预测头颈部癌症男性幸存者重返工作岗位状态的准确性。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Feb;27(2):433-441. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4322-y. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
9
WHODAS 2.0 Can Predict Institutionalization among Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.WHODAS 2.0 可预测颅脑损伤患者的住院情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 26;16(9):1484. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091484.
10
World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0): development and validation of the Nigerian Igbo version in patients with chronic low back pain.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS 2.0):尼日利亚伊博语版本在慢性下腰痛患者中的开发与验证
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Nov 17;21(1):755. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03763-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Continuity of Care for Persons With Serious Mental Illness in a Rural Rehabilitation Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic in India.在印度 COVID-19 大流行期间,农村康复项目中严重精神疾病患者的连续性护理。
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Jul;73(7):830-833. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100462. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
2
Community-Based Rehabilitation for Persons with Severe Mental Illness in a Rural Community of Karnataka: Methodology of a Randomized Controlled Study.卡纳塔克邦一个农村社区中重度精神疾病患者的社区康复:一项随机对照研究的方法
Indian J Psychol Med. 2020 Dec;42(6 Suppl):S73-S79. doi: 10.1177/0253717620971203. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
3
Impact of community-based rehabilitation for mental illness on 'out of pocket' expenditure in rural South India.
社区精神康复对印度南部农村地区精神疾病患者自付费用的影响。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2019 Aug;44:138-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.07.029. Epub 2019 Jul 14.
4
Disability Certification in India: Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale versus World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule.印度的残疾认证:印度残疾评估量表与世界卫生组织残疾评定量表的对比
Indian J Psychol Med. 2017 Sep-Oct;39(5):715-716. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_166_17.
5
World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: An international systematic review.世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0:国际系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Nov;39(23):2347-2380. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1223177. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
6
Sensitivity to imputation models and assumptions in receiver operating characteristic analysis with incomplete data.在存在不完整数据的接受者操作特征分析中对插补模型和假设的敏感性。
J Stat Comput Simul. 2015;85(17):3498-3511. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2014.983111.
7
Internal consistency & validity of Indian disability evaluation and assessment scale (IDEAS) in patients with schizophrenia.印度残疾评估量表(IDEAS)在精神分裂症患者中的内部一致性和效度
Indian J Med Res. 2014 Nov;140(5):637-43.
8
Implementing disability evaluation and welfare services based on the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: experiences in Taiwan.基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》框架实施残疾评估和福利服务:台湾的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 14;13:416. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-416.
9
Evolution of system for disability assessment based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: A Taiwanese study.基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的残疾评估系统的演变:一项台湾地区的研究。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2013 Nov;112(11):691-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
10
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis for Medical Diagnostic Test Evaluation.用于医学诊断测试评估的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析。
Caspian J Intern Med. 2013 Spring;4(2):627-35.