• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于三值决策,通过临床医生的主观方法对精神障碍进行分类。

Classifying mental disorders through clinicians' subjective approach based on three-way decisions.

作者信息

Wang Huidong, Sourav Md Sakib Ullah, Yang Mengdi, Zhang Jiaping

机构信息

School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Engineering, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 7;14:1144826. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1144826. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1144826
PMID:37484085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10362337/
Abstract

The most widely used technique for psychiatric diagnosis is a contemporary manual-based procedure based on prevailing culture-bound data for the classification of mental disorders. However, it has several inherent faults, including the misdiagnosis of complex patient phenomena and others. A potential mental patient from a minority culture could present with atypical symptoms that would be missed by the standard approach. Using the three-way decisions (3WD) as a framework, we propose a unified model that represents the subjective approach (CSA) of clinicians (psychiatrists and psychologists) consisting of three components: qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis, and evaluation-based analysis. The results of the qualitative and quantitative investigation are a classification list and a set of numerical weights based on malady severity levels according to the clinician's highest level of assumptions. Moreover, we construct a comparative classification of diseases into three categories with varying levels of importance; a three-way evaluation-based model is utilized in this study in order to better comprehend and communicate these results. This proposed method enables clinicians to consider identical data-driven individual behavioral symptoms of patients to be integrated with the current manual-based process as a complementary diagnostic instrument to improve the accuracy of mental disorder diagnosis.

摘要

用于精神疾病诊断的最广泛使用的技术是一种基于当代手册的程序,该程序基于流行的与文化相关的数据对精神障碍进行分类。然而,它有几个固有缺陷,包括对复杂患者现象的误诊等。来自少数族裔文化的潜在精神疾病患者可能会出现非典型症状,而标准方法会遗漏这些症状。以三元决策(3WD)为框架,我们提出了一个统一模型,该模型代表临床医生(精神科医生和心理学家)的主观方法(CSA),由三个部分组成:定性分析、定量分析和基于评估的分析。定性和定量调查的结果是一个分类列表和一组根据临床医生的最高假设水平按疾病严重程度划分的数值权重。此外,我们将疾病分为三类,并进行了重要性不同的比较分类;本研究采用基于三元评估的模型,以便更好地理解和传达这些结果。这种提议的方法使临床医生能够将患者相同的、由数据驱动的个体行为症状与当前基于手册的流程相结合,作为一种补充诊断工具,以提高精神障碍诊断的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c9d/10362337/54afb251d7c7/fpsyg-14-1144826-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c9d/10362337/70cb06062263/fpsyg-14-1144826-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c9d/10362337/0c1adefe4d0e/fpsyg-14-1144826-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c9d/10362337/54afb251d7c7/fpsyg-14-1144826-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c9d/10362337/70cb06062263/fpsyg-14-1144826-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c9d/10362337/0c1adefe4d0e/fpsyg-14-1144826-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c9d/10362337/54afb251d7c7/fpsyg-14-1144826-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Classifying mental disorders through clinicians' subjective approach based on three-way decisions.基于三值决策,通过临床医生的主观方法对精神障碍进行分类。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 7;14:1144826. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1144826. eCollection 2023.
2
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.
3
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
4
The Clinician's Subjective Experience during the Interaction with Adolescent Psychiatric Patients: Validity and Reliability of the Assessment of Clinician's Subjective Experience.临床医生与青少年精神科患者互动时的主观体验:临床医生主观体验评估的效度和信度。
Psychopathology. 2021;54(3):119-126. doi: 10.1159/000513769. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
5
Legal and Policy Considerations in Lebanon Related to Proposals for Paraphilic Disorders in World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases Manual, 11th Version.黎巴嫩与世界卫生组织《国际疾病分类》第 11 版有关恋物癖障碍提案相关的法律和政策考虑。
J Sex Med. 2020 Mar;17(3):491-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
6
What can we learn about the psychiatric diagnostic categories by analysing patients' lived experiences with Machine-Learning?通过分析患者的生活经历,我们可以从机器学习中学到哪些关于精神科诊断类别的知识?
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 24;22(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03984-2.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
An alternative hierarchical organization of the mental disorders of the DSM-IV.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)中精神障碍的另一种层级组织。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2008 Aug;117(3):693-8. doi: 10.1037/a0012535.
9
Letter to the Editor: EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE ICD-11 CHAPTER ON MENTAL DISORDERS.致编辑的信:与 ICD-11 精神障碍章节相关的教育活动。
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):291-292. doi: 10.5080/u26898.
10
Association between Clinician's Subjective Experience during Patient Evaluation and Psychiatric Diagnosis.患者评估期间临床医生的主观体验与精神科诊断之间的关联
Psychopathology. 2016;49(2):83-94. doi: 10.1159/000444506. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The Insulin-like Growth Factor Family as a Potential Peripheral Biomarker in Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review.胰岛素样生长因子家族作为精神疾病潜在的外周生物标志物:一项系统综述
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 12;26(6):2561. doi: 10.3390/ijms26062561.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of psychosocial burden and psychiatric symptoms in patients with psychiatric disorders during the Covid-19 pandemic.精神障碍患者在新冠疫情期间心理社会负担和精神症状的演变。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Feb;272(1):29-40. doi: 10.1007/s00406-021-01268-6. Epub 2021 May 3.
2
The Clinician's Subjective Experience during the Interaction with Adolescent Psychiatric Patients: Validity and Reliability of the Assessment of Clinician's Subjective Experience.临床医生与青少年精神科患者互动时的主观体验:临床医生主观体验评估的效度和信度。
Psychopathology. 2021;54(3):119-126. doi: 10.1159/000513769. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
3
COVID-19 patients managed in psychiatric inpatient settings due to first-episode mental disorders in Wuhan, China: clinical characteristics, treatments, outcomes, and our experiences.
在中国武汉,因首发精神障碍而在精神科住院治疗的 COVID-19 患者:临床特征、治疗、结局和我们的经验。
Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 2;10(1):337. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-01022-x.
4
[Adjustment Disorder, Depression, Stress Symptoms, Corona Related Anxieties and Coping Strategies during the Corona Pandemic (COVID-19) in Swiss Medical Staff].瑞士医务人员在新冠疫情(COVID-19)期间的适应障碍、抑郁、压力症状、新冠相关焦虑及应对策略
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2020 Jul;70(7):272-282. doi: 10.1055/a-1192-6608. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
5
The attribute reductions of three-way concept lattices.三支概念格的属性约简
Knowl Based Syst. 2016 May 1;99:92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.01.045. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
6
Heterogeneity in psychiatric diagnostic classification.精神疾病诊断分类的异质性。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Sep;279:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
7
Analysis of Misdiagnosis of Bipolar Disorder in An Outpatient Setting.门诊环境中双相情感障碍的误诊分析
Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 25;30(2):93-101. doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217080.
8
Three Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC).理解和分类精神障碍的三种方法:ICD-11、DSM-5 和国家精神卫生研究所的研究领域标准 (RDoC)。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017 Sep;18(2):72-145. doi: 10.1177/1529100617727266.
9
Association between Clinician's Subjective Experience during Patient Evaluation and Psychiatric Diagnosis.患者评估期间临床医生的主观体验与精神科诊断之间的关联
Psychopathology. 2016;49(2):83-94. doi: 10.1159/000444506. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
10
Psychiatric classifications: validity and utility.精神疾病分类:效度与效用。
World Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;15(1):26-31. doi: 10.1002/wps.20284.