Suppr超能文献

人类基因组编辑未来的七个开放性问题。

Seven open questions in the futures of human genome editing.

作者信息

Nelson John P, Selin Cynthia L

机构信息

School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, 1120 South Cady Mall, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5603.

School for the Future of Innovation in Society/Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, Arizona State University, 1120 South Cady Mall, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5603.

出版信息

Futures. 2023 May;149. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2023.103138. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

Abstract

Scholarly discussion around the governance of human genome editing (HGE) recognizes that development and application of HGE techniques could result in unexpected societal outcomes. However, it contains few to no methodological models for how to anticipate, prepare for, or shape such outcomes. This article presents early-stage results from research guided by anticipatory governance, a framework for broad expert and public consideration of innovation processes and purposes. We present and discuss key themes emerging from a set of future-oriented interviews with genome editing practitioners and experts, designed to inform broadly scoped deliberations about plausible futures of HGE. We articulate our results as seven "open questions," the answers to which will be important components of HGE's eventual shape and outcomes. Some themes are perennial in studies of science and society, and others are more novel to HGE. Each helps to reframe HGE beyond a simple comparison of risk and benefit. Such reframing opens up new and important terrain for discussion among policymakers, academics, scientists, and publics. We suggest that discussion framed around broad and reflexive questions like those presented here will help governance efforts to better acknowledge and flexibly respond to the uncertainty and complexities of HGE developments.

摘要

围绕人类基因组编辑(HGE)治理的学术讨论认识到,HGE技术的开发和应用可能会导致意想不到的社会后果。然而,对于如何预测、应对或塑造这些后果,它几乎没有提供任何方法模型。本文展示了以预期治理为指导的研究的早期成果,预期治理是一个让专家和公众广泛参与对创新过程及目的进行考量的框架。我们展示并讨论了从一组面向未来的访谈中浮现出的关键主题,这些访谈对象包括基因组编辑从业者和专家,旨在为关于HGE可能未来的广泛审议提供信息。我们将研究结果归纳为七个“开放性问题”,这些问题的答案将是HGE最终形态和结果的重要组成部分。有些主题在科学与社会研究中一直存在,而其他一些主题对HGE来说则较为新颖。每个主题都有助于超越简单的风险与收益比较来重新审视HGE。这种重新审视为政策制定者、学者、科学家和公众之间的讨论开辟了新的重要领域。我们认为,围绕像本文所提出的这类广泛且具有反思性的问题展开讨论,将有助于治理工作更好地认识并灵活应对HGE发展中的不确定性和复杂性。

相似文献

1
Seven open questions in the futures of human genome editing.
Futures. 2023 May;149. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2023.103138. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
2
Toward Anticipatory Governance of Human Genome Editing: A Critical Review of Scholarly Governance Discourse.
J Responsible Innov. 2021;8(3):382-420. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2021.1957579. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
3
Governing with public engagement: an anticipatory approach to human genome editing.
Sci Public Policy. 2024 Mar 25;51(4):680-691. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scae010. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
An imbalanced approach to governance? An analysis of the WHO's position on human genome editing.
Bioethics. 2023 Sep;37(7):656-661. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13193. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
5
Researching the future: scenarios to explore the future of human genome editing.
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Sep 21;24(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00951-8.
6
Steering vaccinomics innovations with anticipatory governance and participatory foresight.
OMICS. 2011 Sep;15(9):637-46. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0087. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
7
Challenging the Boundaries Between Treatment, Prevention, and Enhancement in Human Genome Editing.
CRISPR J. 2024 Aug;7(4):180-187. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2024.0021. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
8
Heritable genome editing and cognitive biases: why broad societal consensus is the wrong standard for moving forward.
J Law Biosci. 2022 Feb 7;9(1):lsac002. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsac002. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
9
Human genome editing in clinical applications: Japanese lay and expert attitudes.
Front Genet. 2023 Aug 17;14:1205092. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1205092. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Human Heritable Genome Editing and its Governance: Views of Scientists and Governance Professionals.
New Genet Soc. 2024;43(1). doi: 10.1080/14636778.2024.2404061. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
2
Governing with public engagement: an anticipatory approach to human genome editing.
Sci Public Policy. 2024 Mar 25;51(4):680-691. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scae010. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Anticipatory gaps challenge the public governance of heritable human genome editing.
J Med Ethics. 2025 Apr 24;51(5):jme-2023-109801. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109801.

本文引用的文献

1
Improve alignment of research policy and societal values.
Science. 2020 Jul 3;369(6499):39-41. doi: 10.1126/science.abb3415.
2
A global observatory for gene editing.
Nature. 2018 Mar;555(7697):435-437. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-03270-w.
3
CRISPR'd babies: human germline genome editing in the 'He Jiankui affair'.
J Law Biosci. 2019 Aug 13;6(1):111-183. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsz010. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
The Use and Misuse of in the CRISPR Debate.
CRISPR J. 2019 Oct;2(5):316-323. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2019.0046.
5
A matter of life and longer life.
J Aging Stud. 2019 Sep;50:100800. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2019.100800. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
6
Characterizing Direct-to-Consumer Stem Cell Businesses in the Southwest United States.
Stem Cell Reports. 2019 Aug 13;13(2):247-253. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
7
Inside the circle of trust.
Science. 2019 Aug 2;365(6452):430-437. doi: 10.1126/science.365.6452.430.
8
European Court of Justice delivers no justice to Europe on genome-edited crops.
Plant Biotechnol J. 2020 Jan;18(1):8-10. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13200. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
9
Is Enhancement the Price of Prevention in Human Gene Editing?
CRISPR J. 2018 Dec;1(6):351-354. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2018.0040. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
10
Do CRISPR Germline Ethics Statements Cut It?
CRISPR J. 2018 Apr;1(2):115-125. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2017.0024.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验