Braude Michael, Ratnam Dilip T, Marsh Louise, Abasszade Joshua H, Dev Anouk T
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Monash Health, Clayton 3168, VIC, Australia.
General Practice, Margaret River Medical Centre, Margaret River 6285, Australia.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jul 5;14(4):33-38. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v14.i4.33.
Highly effective and well-tolerated direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies have revolutionised the management of hepatitis C virus (HCV); however, niche populations face treatment barriers. DAAs co-prescribed with several first-generation anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) are contraindicated due to drug-drug interactions. A common example is carbamazepine whereby steady-state carbamazepine reduces the maximum concentration and area under the curve of velpatasvir, glecaprevir and pibrentasvir due to potent cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 induction. Carbamazepine also induces P-glycoprotein which reduces glecaprevir and pibrentasvir's area under curve to infinite time. Sofosbuvir-velpatasvir and glecaprevir-pibrentasvir are contraindicated in patients who are co-prescribed carbamazepine due to the risk of reduced DAA therapeutic effect and consequently, virological treatment failure. This presents a challenge for patients in whom carbamazepine substitution is medically unfeasible, impractical or unacceptable. However, the properties of current generation DAA therapies, including high-potency non-structural protein 5A inhibitory effect, may be sufficient to overcome reduced bioavailability arising from carbamazepine related CYP 3A4 and P-glycoprotein induction.
We present a case series of three patients with non-cirrhotic, treatment-naïve, genotype 1a, 1b, and 3a HCV who were treated with a 12 wk course of glecaprevir-pibrentasvir, while co-prescribed carbamazepine for seizure disorders. Glecaprevir-pibrentasvir combination therapy was chosen due to its potent activity and low barrier to pan-genotypic resistance associated variants. DAA therapy was dose-separated from carbamazepine to maximise time to peak concentration, and taken with meals to improve absorption. Sustained virological response at 12 wk was achieved in each patient with no adverse outcomes.
DAA therapies, including glecaprevir-pibrentasvir, warrant consideration as a therapeutic agent in people with HCV who are co-prescribed carbamazepine, particularly if AED substitution is not feasible.
高效且耐受性良好的直接抗病毒(DAA)疗法彻底改变了丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的治疗方式;然而,特定人群面临治疗障碍。由于药物相互作用,DAA与几种第一代抗癫痫药物(AED)联合使用时是禁忌的。一个常见的例子是卡马西平,由于其对细胞色素P450(CYP)3A4的强效诱导作用,稳态卡马西平会降低维帕他韦、格卡瑞韦和哌仑他韦的最大浓度和曲线下面积。卡马西平还会诱导P-糖蛋白,从而将格卡瑞韦和哌仑他韦的曲线下面积降低至无限时间。由于存在DAA治疗效果降低以及病毒学治疗失败的风险,索磷布韦-维帕他韦和格卡瑞韦-哌仑他韦在与卡马西平联合使用的患者中是禁忌的。这给那些因医学原因无法、不实际或不可接受替换卡马西平的患者带来了挑战。然而,当前一代DAA疗法的特性,包括高效的非结构蛋白5A抑制作用,可能足以克服因卡马西平相关的CYP 3A4和P-糖蛋白诱导导致的生物利用度降低。
我们报告了一个病例系列,三名非肝硬化、初治、基因型为1a、1b和3a的HCV患者,在接受卡马西平治疗癫痫疾病的同时,接受了为期12周的格卡瑞韦-哌仑他韦治疗。选择格卡瑞韦-哌仑他韦联合治疗是因其强效活性以及对泛基因型耐药相关变异的低耐药屏障。DAA治疗与卡马西平的给药时间错开,以最大化达到峰值浓度的时间,并与餐同服以改善吸收。三名患者均在12周时实现了持续病毒学应答,且无不良后果。
包括格卡瑞韦-哌仑他韦在内的DAA疗法,在与卡马西平联合使用的HCV患者中,尤其在无法进行AED替换的情况下,值得考虑作为一种治疗药物。